Bismarck Tribune - North Dakota News - John McCain is the right choice for president

John McCain is the right choice for president

Nov 02, 2008 - 04:05:28 CST

The next president of the United States will face challenges few could have envisioned. The state of the economy, national security, terrorism, housing crisis and a plethora of other issues will test the new administration. Uncertain times require experienced leadership, and the right candidate to lead our nation is John McCain.

McCain is more than just a war hero as his opponent has suggested. His congressional record dates back to 1977 when he was assigned as Director of the Navy Senate Liaison Office. In 1982 he was elected to the U.S. House and four years later became a member of the United States Senate where he continues to serve. Bipartisan leadership and foreign policy experience will be critical during these troubled times, and McCain’s record on both is impressive.

McCain believes in tax breaks for small businesses. The current financial crisis has fueled the belief that Wall Street should pay… and in many ways it should. At the same time it’s evident that when corporations struggle, everyone is negatively impacted. Layoffs and 401(k) statements are proof of that as many Americans have felt or seen significant losses in recent months.

Creating business-orientated tax incentives will assist in getting America back on its feet and must be a top priority for our next president. A healthy main street not only means new job creation, but increased wages for existing workers. Penalizing successful organizations would have the opposite effect and unintended consequences.

Our country must become fiscally responsible again. The national deficit is staggering and will need to be addressed immediately. The national debt stood at $5.7 trillion at the end of the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration will add another estimated $5.3 trillion for a mind-boggling $11 trillion total. Strong leadership and a bipartisan approach will be the key ingredients in balancing the budget. McCain’s record of working with both parties will be an asset; one party alone cannot accomplish the task ahead.

From a North Dakota perspective, McCain’s energy policy bodes well for the state overall. He believes in coal and oil exploration and usage, along with alternative fuels. While he does not support ethanol subsidies, he believes in the industry and supports the development of flex fuel vehicles. He advocates nuclear power for our country in an effort to reduce our reliance on foreign oil, a top priority for our nation as oil prices have reached record levels.

The right experience and a clear direction are McCain’s trademarks, ones that will serve our country well over the next four years as we regroup, rebuild and re-establish our position as the world’s leader.

The Tribune endorses John McCain for president.

News > Opinion

Printer friendly version John McCain is the right choice for president

Comments

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 10, 2008 2:47 PM:

" I find it interesting that Obama is digging in right away today and getting his hands dirty when he hasn't even been INAUGURATED yet! Shows that he is MORE than capable of stepping up and ready to start fixing the nasty mess of the last eight years that he has INHERITED! I seriously DOUBT the credibility of the statement that people "regret" voting for him! I think it's probably coming from the Mccain people and people who probably didn't even VOTE! The Obama supporters, at least the MANY that I know have NO REGRETS! I hear nothing but cheers and sighs of RELIEF!! Funny how that works!! "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 10, 2008 12:18 AM:

" No Koolaid, You're right. It was unfair of me to impugn your motives and I found your response encouraging. All I'm trying to say is that Obama is facing enormous challenges and a declining economy. The promises he laid out during his campaign are substantial and will require some careful, well thought out and very precise steps to be initiated while at the same time stabilizing our industrial base (the auto industry) as well as slowing the deterioration of our overall housing and employment sectors and negotiating the end of two wars while moving toward energy independence.

So, If in that process he brings into his inner circle people he trusts to find the answers and implement the policies to get these things done, let's allow him a bit of latitude and the benefit of a doubt in those choices as well as our support, at least for the first year or so.

We all want integrity in our leaders, we will all benefit if he can find a way to work with congress and re-start our economy, we all, or at least most of us, want to get our troops back home as soon as is reasonably possible.

We are all loyal Americans, taxpayers and citizens. As a nation we've just voted for change and elected a transformational guy to do it. Let's see if he can get the job done for all of us. "

Dougy wrote on Nov 9, 2008 10:24 PM:

" To: Hugo

The Only North Dakotans that will be miserable for the next 8 years currently make over $250,000 a year. Those making less than a quarter million dollars a year (as well as College students) won't be miserable and in fact will enjoy a prosperity that they haven't seen since the Clinton administration. "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 9, 2008 10:10 PM:

" To lw,
The undeniable fact remains that Barack Obama was elected President by a substantial majority of the American people. He was not elected to be our pastor or scoutmaster. He was elected to put a new face on this countrys badly tarnished image, to repair our faltering economy, establish an affordable universal healthcare system, restore strength to the middle class, begin rebuilding our national infrastructure, end two wars with honor as quickly as possible and to take the necessary steps toward moving us back on track to being the beacon of freedom & liberty that was the inspiration and envy of the entire world.

Neither side believed that they were treated fairly by the media. If you know of an unbiased news source please enlighten the rest of us.

Just one other point. The USA is not now nor has it never been a democracy. We are a constitutional republic. If we were a democracy George W. Bush would never have been President...but Barack Obama would. "

lw wrote on Nov 9, 2008 11:11 AM:

" Now that some of the news outlets are admitting to their efforts and screened reporting in favor of and, ultimately, the election of Barack Obama, it seems to me that the whole "historical" aspect of his election is certainly tarnished. It would mean more to people if the first black president had won the election based on his ideals and strength rather than with the aid of organizations who picked the candidate of THEIR choice rather than America's choice. All of this is now starting to surface with statements from Newsweek and the Washington Post. Who knows. Maybe he'll do alright. But the fact remains that this was a controlled hit on anyone who doesn't agree with Obama and that is not democracy. "

No Koolaid wrote on Nov 9, 2008 11:08 AM:

" Watchandsee" posted - "Let's give Obama a chance. He was elected. It bothers me that he is setting up a very partisan cabinet thus far, contrary to what he said in the campaign, but we still need to give him a chance. He made so many promises that it will be impossible to keep half of them. Fortunately for him, people have very short memories. "

Good advice. "

Watchandsee wrote on Nov 9, 2008 10:06 AM:

" Let's give Obama a chance. He was elected. It bothers me that he is setting up a very partisan cabinet thus far, contrary to what he said in the campaign, but we still need to give him a chance. He made so many promises that it will be impossible to keep half of them. Fortunately for him, people have very short memories. "

hugo wrote on Nov 9, 2008 10:05 AM:

" just seems to me there will be a bunch of north dakotans even more miserable for the next and probably eight years, have fun! "

No Koolaid wrote on Nov 9, 2008 9:04 AM:

" To 'Voice of Reason' - I also noticed that you attacked me and not the facts of the Associated Press story about Obama changing his tune on his core platform two days after he was elected. I'm interesting in hearing your view about how Obama's first selections for key positions that include people with reputations for 'foul-mouthed brass knuckle insider politics' lines up with Obama's campaign committments to move government to a 'more civil' and 'post-partisan era'.

Watch what people do, not what they say they do. "

No Koolaid wrote on Nov 9, 2008 8:55 AM:

" TO 'Voice of Reason' who posted - " To No Koolaid, Ok, I get it. You want Obama to be a failure and you're going to begin a full frontal assault before he even takes office .... like it or not will be our leader for at least the next four years, you obviously want America to fail as well .... Fortunately some of us, who are hoping that America will be able to renew it's sagging economy and repair it's battered image are going to support our President and wish him well...."

No; you don't get it. I want integrity in our government leaders. All of them. That means they do what they say they will do. Not just what it takes to get elected. I hope Obama succeeds wildly but I'll be watching actions, not words.

The same talking heads on MSNBC and even on these forums who wouldn't let President Bush buy a break and savaged him for every camera-frozen funny look or mispronounced foreign word are now chanting about respecting the office of the presidency. How patriotic! (How convenient and hypocritical). BTW, Obama isn't the President yet so I'll be watching for actions., not words, about respect for the office.

Save me your faux-angst. I'll be the biggest supporter Obama ever had if he follows through on his pledge to lead our country to better times. But I'll be watching for actions not words. I encourage everyone to get out and actually DO something to make our country better. Throwing talking points out from a computer doesn't add much. "

W.J. Hinrichs wrote on Nov 9, 2008 7:51 AM:

" My initial reaction upon learning that ND. had voted for John McCain in last week's presidential election was not positive. Terms like "old-fashioned", "behind the times", "out-dated" came to mind. It seemed that for folks to vote for four more years of Republican Economic Policies that have brought our country and the world to the brink of world-wide depression is ludicrous to say the least!

However, after a few minutes of thought and reflection, it occurred to me that you folks made the right decision because from your perspective, our beloved state
is in pretty darn good shape compared to most other states. I recall reading recently that ND has a billion dollar "nest-egg", oil reserves, biofuel production, good farm land, and hard-working people. I must concur that if something is working, you don't try to fix it!

W.J. Hinrichs "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 9, 2008 2:15 AM:

" To No Koolaid, Ok, I get it. You want Obama to be a failure and you're going to begin a full frontal assault before he even takes office.

Since he was elected by a near landslide to be our next President and, like it or not will be our leader for at least the next four years, you obviously want America to fail as well.
Fortunately some of us, who are hoping that America will be able to renew it's sagging economy and repair it's battered image are going to support our President and wish him well.

Don't let your disappointment at the election results blind you to the fact that we are all Americans, and the future of our society is in the balance.

If he fails, he will be replaced, but none of us will know that for at least a year or two. Weve hired him. Let's see if he can do the job. Attacking him at this stage does no one any good. "

STUPID BILL G-A-R-R wrote on Nov 9, 2008 12:18 AM:

" DEW... Don't you think you're taking that woman's comments out of context? The key word on that rat-hole site of yours was 'worry'. And there you go again calling people 'stupid'. Have you no class DEW? You are the 'smart' ones and we're the 'stupid' ones? How 'smart' are you to have LOST to the 'stupid ones? Please grow up! "

Dew wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:41 PM:

" I think Obama will do a great job and probably run again.... "

I don't! I wish I did not have this terrible feeling.... I would have taken Hillary over Obama any day of the week! Obama has way to many people to pay back for their support..... He 'owes' too many people ! He also has way to many people taht think he is oging to do everything for them....read my other post! When these people find out that he is just a man, and not the man that they thought he was, the one that would solve all their problems.....They will turn on him! Right now 'everyone' that makes less than $250,000 is expecting to get at least $500 stimulus check...
It aint' gonna happen! (not really 'everyone', the smart ones that didn't vote for him know better) I just telaked to great number of people today and not one of them thinks that Obama was the right choice! I wonder if people are beginnig to realize they made a mistake? Too late now!
As I said, I will not go to another country and put down our President as the Dixie Hicks did! "

Dew wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:25 PM:

" Erik: The 'softball' questions were all reserved for Obama! There is not one interviewer in all of the 'interviews that even got close to asking Obama a 'tough' question.... Except maybe Bill O'Reilly!

How would YOU know anything about who McCain should have picked? Since when are you the one that interviews people for that kind of job? As Bill GARR says, YOU are irrelevant!

You say one thing then you say the other.... I think you are afraid that Palin will come back in 2012! Don't believe all you hear in the media.... most of you believe way too much about Obama:

Barack Obama Will Pay Your Mortgage And Fill Your Gas Tank

http://belowthebeltway.com/2008/10/31/barack-obama-will-pay-your-mortgage-and-fill-your-gas-tank/
LOL..... Are these people really serious? Don't forget she voted for Obama.... stupid people? YES! "

Kathleen wrote on Nov 8, 2008 5:35 PM:

" Very interesting leter from a Democrat - google Would the Last Honest Reporter Please Turn On the Lights - you will find it in many places. "

No Koolaid wrote on Nov 8, 2008 3:11 PM:

" 11/7/2008 - A/P - Chicago and front page of Bis Trib: "Barack Obama is signaling a shift in tactics and temperament as he moves from candidate to president-elect, picking sharp-elbowed Washington insiders for top posts."

Obama picked a Chief of Staff described in the A/P story as "a fiery partisan who doesn't mind breaking glass and hurting feelings" and "is known as a foul-mouthed practitioner of brass-knuckled politics who relishes both conflict and publicity". Obama also picked a transition manager described as "a tough partisan infighter".

So much for all those that wondered if Obama would actually DO what he SAID he would do when he campaigned on a platform of a new era of civility, non-partisanship, a centrist approach and the elimination of Washigton insiders as the powerbrokers. We have our answer now.

The Democrats love to heap praise on themselves as the party of the liberal, the tolerant, the compassionate, and the promoters of freedom in thought and action. Match that against Obama's first actions only days after his election. Notice some things that aren't lining up?

So much for a new era. The politician's motto - "It doesn't matter what you say. What matters is that they believe you." "

wally wrote on Nov 8, 2008 2:58 PM:

" How about Palin-Plumber (aka Joe) in 2012 "

wally wrote on Nov 8, 2008 2:41 PM:

" Even I find it hard to believe that Palin didn't know those things. After all it was reported first on FOX News(?).
But, if you think it helps her image, more power to ya.
She could be the Senator from Alaska by this time next year, which I think she will be. "

Erik wrote on Nov 8, 2008 2:23 PM:

" There are two female Republican Senators from Maine who would have been better VP picks for McCain. Governor Rell of Connecticut would surely have done a better job answering Katie Couric's softball questions.

If Republicans want a female candidate for President in 2012, they can easily find someone more credible and with more appeal to independent voters than Gov Palin. Democrats should hope that her appeal to the Republican right continues and she makes it back to the ticket. "

VoR wrote on Nov 8, 2008 12:05 PM:

" To dante, "Palin-Mccain in 2012!!!!! "

From your keyboard to God's screen. "

dante wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:05 AM:

" Palin-Mccain in 2012!!!!! "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 8, 2008 9:37 AM:

" Dew, I think it's great that you have hope that someday there will be a female president! We made history on Nov 4th by electing the first African American president in a country with the skeletons of racism, slavery, civil rights violations, and unjustified killing and lynching in our closet, and look how far we have come. I for one am proud of the fact that we have evolved to this point. I do believe that the next phase is a female president, but not Palin. But if she studys up, get more experience, and ran against a female Democrat, wow would THAT be interesting! But not in 2012, because I think Obama will do a great job and probably run again, but maybe someday.... "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 8, 2008 9:30 AM:

" Laurel, NICE try! But, I'm a REDHEAD!! And a firey one at that! So much for NOT making assumptions! If you voted for Obama, then why are you debating with someone else who voted for Obama for very DIFFERENT reasons than you did then?? I don't recall him ever saying he would legalize marijuana sweetie, but if that's your thing, then I'm pretty SURE I'm brighter than YOU and not the other way around! Have fun!! There are plenty of examples on this board of people pouting because Mccain lost, so if you voted for Obama, then that obvously doesn't apply to you!! "

Dew wrote on Nov 8, 2008 8:34 AM:

" Palins Education: So now you beleive all the nasty stuff that is coming out of the McCain's camp, blaming Palin for the stuff that THEY didn't do right! Watch Greta on Monday night! She will do the iinterview with Palin and she will tell the REAL STORY!
It will be a much watched show.... because, like Palin or not she, does draw the crowds!
BTW.... when does one believe 'unnamed sources'? If all that was true then they spuld be PROUD to come out and say their names! Or are they afraid they will never be able to work for another politicain again? I think the latter is the right one. McCain needs to set the record straight!

This can only help Palin to get into the media more....Look at all the attention right now.... it is not an Obama....as it should be.... it is on Sarah Palin!

One reason why Obama won is because there was so much media attenetion to him and to Hillary during their debates.... His name was in the news all the time! Media attention helps! So, keep talking about SARAH! It is only going to help her!
There already has been one personSteve Schmidt, that went on record, stated what these people have said is not correct! His name was linked with it.... so he does know what is correct and what is not!

So, why don't we talke about the REAL issues of how Obama is going to solve the problems that he promised us all HE could solve.... and don't go blaming Bush for all this.... HE wanted this job! "

Ezra wrote on Nov 8, 2008 5:42 AM:

" Dew, the answer is never fix things, just leave. What if a business operated that way. It just told the customers if you don't like the way we do business leave? "

Palins Education wrote on Nov 8, 2008 4:31 AM:

" The truth is out. Sarah Palin was so uninformed that McCain aides helping her rehearse for the debate with Joe Biden said she did not know that Africa was a continent, not a country, and claiming that she did not know which countries were covered by the North American Free Trade Agreement. Its totally absurd to think she could have been elected vice president. Whats even more absurd is that the GOP thinks the American people are stupid enough to vote for her. Shame on the people of North Dakota. The state was one of the only states outside of the Confederate states to vote McCain / Palin. "

BILL G-A-R-R wrote on Nov 8, 2008 1:35 AM:

" VOR..... my gosh, the re-count hasn't even begun with that race and they have already narrowed it to 207 votes. Mpls/St. Paul, Edina, Duluth, Rochester and more have all sided with Franken. My guess is that there are plenty of uncounted votes in the out-state regions, due to partisan election judges, whose votes were discounted or purposely lost.. The nerve of Coleman to state that the cost [90,000.00] is not worth the recount. It's just another example of republican hypocrisy. He wants Franken to give it up as if he would do the same. My money is on Franken, who by the way is 'NOT' a felon, he's straight [not that there is anything wrong with that] and he's is in love with his wife. Can we say family values?.. "

Dew wrote on Nov 7, 2008 9:06 PM:

" Ezra....But, they come back after they find out it is not so nice out here in the Blue states! I do not know why YOU live in ND if it is so darn bad! Just like the people in other countries that complain about the USA.... where is the place all the people want to move to? France? Venzuala? England? Iran? Russia?

We do not need all the PORK that comes into the state..... we can all survive without that PORK..... Unless you are the welfare people! Get off the PORK people! "

VoR wrote on Nov 7, 2008 5:26 PM:

" To BILL G-A-R-R,

Rumor has it that they go well with a side of fava beans.
Cannibalism is interesting to watch, but kind of ugly too.

How do you think Al Franken will do in the re-count? "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 7, 2008 5:01 PM:

" To In the Know,
Remember, when you talk to God, you're praying......When God talks to you, you're schizophrenic.

That's Ok, reality is alright in small doses, but as a lifestyle it's gets confining.

Great posts lately, good to see you're on the "real" Country First team.

Once the majority of Americans agree to put our petty differences aside, we can once again become the shining beacon of Liberty & Freedom to a weary world.

God bless the U.S.A.. "

Ezra wrote on Nov 7, 2008 3:48 PM:

" You got it OUT OF THE LOOP we would starve to death in North Dakota if it were not for socialism. Look at the coops what are they? The silly Republicans like to brag about their big surplus. Take away farm subsidies and the would not have a milk can to urinate in. "

BILL G-A-R-R wrote on Nov 7, 2008 2:07 PM:

" This headline 'John Mcacin is the right choice for president' will go down in history with 'DEWEY WINS'. I'll need to ask a republican what a republican tastes like since they are eating their own. Chicken? or Fish?. This Palin story is purely a republican story. Let the blame game begin. "

Out_of_the_Loop wrote on Nov 7, 2008 12:30 PM:

" Ezra, are you saying that we already have redistribution of income? Is the wealth being spread here from urban areas? What kind of socialists are running this show? "

Ezra wrote on Nov 7, 2008 8:45 AM:

" I am so proud to live in a Red state that voted Republican. 88% of obese people live in Red states. Red states only contribute one third of the tax revenue to the treasury. Of the ten lowest ranking states for teacher pay nine are Red states. North Dakota is only third from the bottom. The divorce rate in Red states is 27% higher even though we have the vast majority of evangelicals, and all the crooked evangelical preachers. To be associated with all the ex slave states is something North Dakota can really be proud of. To know all our social statistics match Mississippis, Alabamas, Georgias, and every other poor state in the union, brings me untold joy.

Additionally, in the Red States, 38 percent actually believe Jonah was

swallowed by a whale; 62 percent believe life is sacred unless it involves

the death penalty or gun ownership; 44 percent claim that evolution is only

a theory; 53 percent insist that Saddam Hussein was involved in 9/11; and 61

percent of you crazy North Dakotans believe you have higher moral standards than

those in the blue states. Without the subsidies from the Blue states North Dakota would be broke. We are a proud people that stand on our own. Perhaps with good Republican leadership we can remain in the past forever. Mean while we wonder why the young leave after they receive an education. "

Sore Loserman wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:48 PM:

" Remember that funny GOP joke eight years ago?

So how IS the GOP reacting in general now? Graciously? Hmmm... "

In the Know wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:21 PM:

" Don't worry folks.....Not only does God talk to George Bush but he talks to me as well. God told me to tell you that Obama will do a fine job. "

Snookered wrote on Nov 6, 2008 6:25 PM:

" Forget it, I'm done with you. "

Laurel wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:18 PM:

" To "mom"-of-teens: actually, I did vote Obama.

I will however, point out your quote: "Pouting because your side lost is was is childish! " So, since your brainy blonde brain thought "AHA! She must be republican!!" after my few sentences.....Lord help us all. I voted Obama since he is for abortion, marijuana legalization, and many other liberal views.

Please think twice before condemning your 'neighbor'...although I DO believe I am 1 lightbulb brighter than you are, m' dear. = ) "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:58 PM:

" To Snookered: If your comment is that someone is making a statement, please provide some support for it - who is saying it or a link to where it is posted. "

Snookered wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:56 PM:

" To Online Editor: I see by your response to Erik that you are still out there. I'm still wondering what happened to my post. Can't you even answer that?? "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 6, 2008 4:32 PM:

" To Erik: I checked the deleted posts, I don't see anything there from you. There's a chance it didn't get posted for some reason. "

Trygve wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:43 PM:

" I can prove that many other factors are causing the stock market decline. I can also prove that the stock market has had a higher average annual return under Democratic administrations than under Republican administrations since 1929. Even if you exclude the stock market disaster under Hoover, Republican administration years have averaged less than half the average annual return as Democratic administrations. Still want to argue that the stock market is a good indicator? "

NDFREEZE wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:42 PM:

" TO LJ: not to jump in your conversation with MOT - But your ending statement humored me. Did you really think that even if John McCain would have won the stock market would have sprung back to life? As you said the next four years will be very interesting for our country, I just hope everyone realizes that it will take a couple of years to dig our country out of the mess from the last four years of our corporations and government taking advantage of us. Instead of blaming Obama and the liberals -- lets blame the people that bought houses they KNEW they couldn't afford. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:34 PM:

" Laurel, gee you talk as though you know everything about me or something! Funny, you know nothing about me. My kids have nothing to do with this argument, but since you brought it up, yes they are allowed to make their own choices and don't have things pushed on them! That's called being a LIBERAL DEMOCRAT! Conservative REPUBLICAN is pushing things on other people, sorry you have it backwards, but glad I could clarify for you! Pouting because your side lost is was is childish! LJ, I simply said that ONE VOTE wasn't enough to prove that the entire country is packed with fraudulent votes as you implied in your post that Obama won because of fraudulent votes with and S being counted! Just speaking to what you wrote! As far as the recount in Florida, I have researched that issue VERY thoroughly and it is anything BUT a myth!! "

LJ wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:49 PM:

" To MOT. Can you tell me why liberals never directly answer questions but instead attack the person asking the questions? You accused me of not being able to prove any illegal votes were cast and I proved you wrong so you attack me. I never said who this person voted for, you just jumped to a conclusion. Twice I have presented facts that prove your opinions wrong and both times you attacked me. Are you familiar with the saying if you dont have a good argument, attack? Once again you are presented your opinion as fact. I respect everybodys opinions unless facts prove them wrong. As for voter fraud in Florida during 2000 that is just another myth that has never been proven. Having to prove that you are eligible to vote, which your argument is based on, is not voter suppression. As for standing up in court you have to have proof to back up your statements/opinions unlike on this blog. Actually I am happy that Obama has been elected. I see it as a win win situation. Either we are headed into the greatest time in the history of our country or the total destruction of the liberal party. The country wins either way. This all I have to say on this subject as I have a more intellectually challenging debate with a fence post in 10 minutes. PS. The NASDAQ is down over 800 points since the election. Coincidence??? "

Laurel wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:18 PM:

" Mom of teens, is this your parenting style as well? Your "nya nya nya nya boo boo" attitude is pretty childish. I would hope for your kids' sake you allow choices that they can make....not choices that are pushed onto them.

Please re-think your status as a parent, and quit the petty arguing. "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:09 PM:

" To LJ,
It is disconcerting to say the least reading gleefully derisive comments aimed at undermining our President Elect before he has made even one executive decision. What possible good can come of such an anti-American display of bitterness and refusal to recognize the overwhelming voice of our elective process?

Please don't misunderstand my point. I don't question your right to do it. As repugnant as I believe it is, I don't question the right of someone to desecrate our flag either. That doesn't mean I think such actions are right or honorable. In fact I believe that those who would do so are beneath contempt.

I question your patriotism. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:50 AM:

" One vote doesn't prove voter fraud throughout the entire country! ND went to Mccain, not Obama, so that didn't affect the outcome of the election! How do you know this person didn't vote for Mccain and not Obama? You can't make a statement like that based on ONE vote! However, if you want a REALLY good example of voter fraud and voter SUPRESSION look at Florida in 2000! That's a really good example of both which DID affect the outcome of the election! Which I'm sure is one of the reasons people were encouraged to vote EARLY this time; KNOWING that more African Americans would turn out to vote. Over half the voter supression that occurred in Florida in 2000 was targeted toward African Americans because they typically vote Democrat. "

Mindy wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:33 AM:

" I am soooooooooooooo glad Obama won!! YAY! "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:19 AM:

" LJ, so you found ONE vote?? ONE WHOLE VOTE and that proves that millions of illegal votes were counted in this election?? Wow, I would hate for you to investigate ANYTHING on my behalf EVER!! Jumping to those kinds of conclusions is DANGEROUS! One illegal vote in ND?? Mccain WON ND; Obama DIDN'T, so as far as OUTCOME it obviously didn't affect the outcome did it?? If that's ALL you have to base your conclusion on, it's not enough to proove anything! WEAK, very WEAK!! And yes, you are RIGHT about ONE thing! Ignorance IS bliss, but hey if you ever want a lesson on how to do a THOROUGH, CREDIBILE investigation that would stand up in COURT, let me know ANYTIME!! I would be more than GLAD to educate you on the subject as I do it EVERYDAY in my job!! And while you are researching voter fraud, be sure and look at Florida in 2000! An excellent example!! "

wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:46 AM:

" The election is over...why is this discussion still up??
Move on.... "

LJ wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:39 AM:

" To MOT. Thanks for my morning laugh. I have always had a hard time believing that someone could con thousands of people out of millions of dollars but you are helping me to understand how that is possible. Some people will believe anything even when facts, statistics, and science say otherwise. I think being gullible is caused from being blinded by hope. While hope is a very good trait to have it also has to be tempered by reality. As the old saying goes ignorance is bliss. Obama has set a very high bar for himself. The next few years are going to be at the very least very interesting. Have you noticed how the stock market loves Obama? Donald Trump stated that yesterday was the biggest drop ever after a presidential election on record. One more thing I do have proof that an illegal vote was cast and counted. I reported an illegal voter Tuesday to the Secretary of State Office and the County Auditor but it was too late for them to find his ballet. The address he gave election officials was up over there past the last light. By state law he never should have been given a ballot without a provable address. Have a good day and keep hoping. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:46 AM:

" LJ, you can spin it any way you want! You have no proof that illegally cast votes were counted; just sour grapes on your end! As far as the so called statistics or facts or whatever you want to call them, they read like more of an opinion to me. Don't like Obama, that's fine! You have FOUR years to learn to like him or four years to train a new horse! Good luck! "

ntnorton72msn.com wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:37 PM:

" I was so happy to be part of last night election process that today I purchased plane tickets for my wife and I to go to DC in Jan to see President Barack Obama sworn in right there on the steps of the capital. It is really an exciting time to be an American and it was so nice to see the other people around the world celebrating along with us. Maybe we can actually become the shining beacon in the world again as opposed to the country that everyone loves to hate. "

Dew wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:20 PM:

" Amuck3 ... Good luck to you too friend~! We just have to keep Obama's feet to the fire now to do all the things he promised to do FOR us! "

Dew wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:11 PM:

" vor...Not to worry, I got it all covered.... I will give it all to charity and then live off the 'checks' Obama is going to send me!~ I can live real well on welfare and food stamps... better than trying to run a business that all the BIG MAN wants to do is TAX YAX TAX! "

move on wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:42 PM:

" I will give our new president a chance, I'm waiting for my tax breaks and paid health care. If he can actually deliver on a fourth of his promises I will be shocked. God help us all... "

Sam wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:19 PM:

" To Dante: Hope you are right. But, we now see Obama picking Rep. Emanual (D-IL) as his Chief of Staff. Emanuel is anything but bi-partisan and closely allied to Pelosi. Plus his choice of a staffer for Rep. Waxman (D-Ca) - hardly a bi-partisan politician - as director of legislative affairs. I hope the change is there, but it's not starting out that way with the initial choice of highly partisan staffers. Even Bill Clinton didn't trust Emanual. "

wally wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:40 PM:

" The coffee never smelled so good as it did this morning. Hope won this time over of fear. What a sight to see it will be in January. For the first time in over 20 years a Bush or Dole will not be in Washington.
Right back at you Bill and VOR, and to everyone else. Although this "debate" has been nasty at times, it really made me realize that I will take HOPE over fear anytime. I will take the possibilities over a fear of change. When the people in this country put their minds to it, the possiblities are unlimited.
President Elect Barack Obama. "

dante wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:08 PM:

" to all my dear friends here that appeciated my comments and support-thank you, too. to those and all others, i have a great hope that the incoming administration will bring a new meaning to "serving the people", to bring our country together, equally(as stated in the Constitution), to be a member of the planet, not a planet in itself, etc.... etc...... and all that. i DID support the outgoing guys when they first came in , but when it became obvious and transparent whta they were doing, i had to speak up. as an independent voter, i will do the same with this bunch.... so lets hope for the best, give the guys a chance..http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oMylfkSDKV0 "

LJ wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:04 PM:

" To MOT. My post was just a clarification of your statement "The MAJORITY of Americans WANT Obama in office". That statement is factually not correct. Only about 1/3rd of eligible voters wanted Obama as president which makes me believe that 2/3rds of eligible voters do not want Obama as president or they would have voted for him. Now your 4:35 post has gone off on some other tangent spinning the facts to fit your idea of reality. You are right about not being able to count votes that were not cast, to bad illegally cast votes were counted. "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 5, 2008 5:16 PM:

" To Jim, Vetter, and especially you DEW, I want to give you a big I LOVE YOU, MAN!
Your faith in this country has pulled me through my darkest hour. And I want to give an especially big I love you man to the main man, Jason. We love you.
Can we have a group hug now?

And VOR----grow up is 2 (two) words...
Best of luck to you and the mot. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:35 PM:

" LJ, I've got news for you; voter turnout was HIGHER this election than in 2004! And the MAJORITY WHO VOTED voted for Obama! As you can plainly see, he not only won a majority of the electoral votes, be he ALSO won the POPULAR vote! But since you brought it up, if people didn't vote in this election, that's their choice and not my problem!! You can't count votes that were never cast!! "

LJ wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:04 PM:

" Sorry to burst your bubble MOT but the majority of Americans didn't vote for Obama. Only about 65% of eligible voters voted which means that only about 34% of Americans want Obama for president. He talked the talk now we will find out if Obama can walk the walk. "

BJB wrote on Nov 5, 2008 3:42 PM:

" To the Trib: Thank you, thank you, thank you for the map you put up that shows all the red and blue states as well as the number of votes each candidate got. Both my children had school projects last night that dealt with the election and this made it a snap!!!

Also congrats to all the Obama supporters. He ran a smart, hard-fought campaign. He deserves all of our support right now. "

Dew wrote on Nov 5, 2008 3:27 PM:

" Voice of Reason: Well, stock market went south again today! So much for better days ahead! It was your friend Bill that said the market loves Obama! LOL!
Oh, BTW.... I will back Obama, just like MOT of teens did, til the going gets a little tough! "

to halatbis wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:09 PM:

" You never ever take a politician at their word....They don't have it in them...that is why they have hidden agendas....with elections...they always tell a person what they WANT to hear!!!!!!! Never the TRUTH!!!! "

MamaMia wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:05 PM:

" Halatbis: Thank you for that well-said congratulations. If we all can work together for the good of this country maybe we can crawl out of this mess we seem to have created. "

VoR wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:00 PM:

" To Amuck3, OK, one more word: GROW-UP! "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:53 PM:

" To M O T, DANTE, Poetic Justice, fp, Shorty, Rugby Reader, Rasmus, Wally, Mama Mia, Model T, In The Know and especially you BILL G-A-R-R I've been uplifted, encouraged and inspired by each of you. It's good to know that folks like you are a part of my community. Better days are just around the corner. I can't find the words to express how hopeful I feel for our country today, and for me that's really saying something.

(FYI Bill, Me and another frequent poster went to the Main Bar one day to visit with the crusty Vet. in the corner wearing the Packers cap. You weren't there and none of the few patrons who were there seemed to know who I was asking about...but you were right about the parking. No problem.)

And Jason, I know that I've made your job even more difficult at times, but always you've handled it with fairness and professionalism. Thank you as well.

Peace, VoR "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:52 PM:

" Amuck3, by the way, I DID back Bush when he was elected DESPITE the foul smell in Florida in 2000, and I backed him even more so after 9-11! So the theory of not practicing what I preach is defunked and inaccurate and a nice scape goat for your unhappiness with the here and now! The problem is that the more time that went on, the less I backed him because of the failed policies and the unethical people that he chose to be around; the war under false pretenses, the blowing of the massive surplus...I could go on and on about why I no longer support Bush, and as a matter of fact, I already have many times. My broken record has been played for the masses many times, and I won't bore you with the details. But, to answer your question... the short answer is yes. "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:39 PM:

" to Mot and Vor--
one question: did you support and get behind Bush when he was elected? I have some doubts that you did. Maybe you should practice what you preach. "

Halatbis wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:37 PM:

" To my Obama friends: You backed a winner! Senator Obama will become President of the United States in January and I wish him well as he takes the reins of government. His success in dealing with the problems of this country will translate into success and well being for us all. He said last night that he will be the President of all America--I will take him at his word. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:37 PM:

" Amuck3, it REALLY depends on what you consider reality doesn't it? Big difference between reality and bias, I recommend you take those sour grapes and make them into wine, drink it, and relax! The MAJORITY of Americans WANT Obama in office; he will be sworn in on Jan 20, 2009. Get over it and look ahead to 2012! You Republicans have four years to think about why Mccain lost, and Obama has four years to earn your trust! He'll either succeed with you or he won't, and if he doesn't, that's what elections and red states are for! "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:22 PM:

" VOR-your sarcastic remarks remind me an awful lot of that "Rachel entertainment" show they have on that dnc channel, msnbc. Sarcasm really doesn't flatter you. (-;

If giving illegal aliens drivers licenses doesn't scare you I guess nothing will.
Since when is becoming president of the United States supposed to be a popularity contest with the rest of the world?
One more thing. Here's a link to help you get started on supporting your man. I doubt you would want to read it though--maybe a little too much reality for you too soon.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article5090077.ece "

Model T wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:59 PM:

" Congrats Mr. Obama. The good news is you won. The bad news is you won.The pile of work on your desk is too much for you. Best you hire a few good people. to name a few. Ask Hil, Bill,Powell, Lugar, Hagel,Richardson,Bush,(Jeb), Rubin, Romney, McCain, Volcker, Buffet, Zig Brzezinski, Good Luck. PS my young granddaughter Flo is in DC . She's a lawyer, may a good idea to have one on your crew.rag91 "

JV Journalism wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:31 PM:

" To Bias and Newspapers - When the trib's online headline is "mccain wins nd" and not obama wins presidency, that's pretty clear. MSNBC - "How He Did It". USAToday - "America Makes History". Fox News - "Tough Road Ahead". All news is biased, but there's varying degrees. Check out MSNBC's county-by-county voting results....eastern ND got it right. Bismarck and the Trib....wrong. "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 5, 2008 11:58 AM:

" To Dew,
Now that you will soon be closing your business and creating greater regional unemployment I suppose you will also be trying to move some inventory or at least office supplies and other equipment.

I hate to see any viable business go under, but maybe some of us can help you to unload your excess stock. If there is anyway we can help you ease into retirement please let us know. "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 5, 2008 11:53 AM:

" To Amuck3, If after re-reading my response you still can't figure out the reason I waited until after the election was called before I responded to you then maybe you should try learning the basics of American government. A good start would be getting a dictionary and looking up the word "election". Wait maybe I can help:

election [i lksh'n](plural elections)
n
1. event at which people vote: an organized event at which somebody is chosen by vote for something, especially a public office

I honestly hope you will eventually come to the realization that Barack Obama is now your President too. That we are all in this together here and the more solidarity we can summon-up at this vital time in our history, the better off we will all be.

Here are my last words to you. If living in fear and eating sour grapes is all you're capable of doing at this transcendent moment in history, then please do it quietly and try not to hinder those of us who are going to dig in our heels and try to salvage this economy and our national prestige by supporting the person that has been overwhelmingly chosen to lead us. Will he be tested? Absolutely. Even more reason to make sure that He, and the rest of the world knows that we will support him. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 11:41 AM:

" Amuck3, I had a really GOOD response to your post, but obviously it isn't going to get posted, so I will attempt to sumarize....suffice it to say that the denial isn't on my side of the isle, I'm escstatic with the REALITY that the Bush/Cheney rein of terror is FINALLY OVER for GOOD as things couldn't GET MUCH WORSE, and those of you who CHOOSE not to "put country first" and refuse to back Obama when he's already WON the race... you are the ones who will be left in the haze! "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:05 AM:

" Hey Mom of teens: Can I call you M.O.T.?
I am confident you'll eventually have the haze lifted from your mind and reality will set in. You're in denial. If you think everything is bad now, just give BO some time. Change is what you wanted, change is what you'll get...
I'll give you the last word but make it good this time. "

YEAH wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:56 AM:

" Theres a new Sheriff in Washington! And they go by the name DNP. "

Simle Mom wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:49 AM:

" Scooby DEWby DEW, where are you??

So, when will your "closed" sign appear on your business? "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:45 AM:

" When Obama made his victory speech, not only was it inspiring, but it showed a lot of class when he spoke about John Mccain and Sarah Palin; more evidence that he will unite and not divide. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:18 AM:

" Your welcome Bill and thank YOU as well! By the way, you can call me M.O.T!! "

Rasmus wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:17 AM:

" The Republicans would have raised the cry, "Mandate! Mandate!" at this point. I don't believe Obama will do that. Now we can expect Supreme Court nominees who will stick to the US Constitution without interjecting their rightwing bias or religion into our laws. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:16 AM:

" Vetter, if that were the case then the Bush administration would have acted eight years ago, which was my whole point. Had they acted after 9-11 instead of telling everyone to shop, we would be closer to a fix. Amuck3, I feel for you; I'm not afraid one bit! In fact, I'm ecstatic that the Bush/Cheney rein of terror is over and that Obama will get our country back on track and restore our position in the world! That shouldn't scare you, that you comfort you to know that when the rest of the world doesn't hate us, they won't harm us. "

BILL G-A-R-R wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:37 AM:

" Congratulations Pres. elect Barack Hussein Obama, you will make a fine president.
Thank you DANTE,Thank you Poetic Justice, Thank you fp, Thank you Shorty, Thank you MOM OF TEENS, Thank you Rugby Reader, Thank you Wally, Thank you Mam Mia, Thank you Moodel T and especially you VOR. you kept me going during my darkest days. And of course Thank you Jason, you deserve a raise and /or a better job. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:12 AM:

" I thought John Mccain did a very nice job in his concession speech! He spoke with more eloquence, fairness, and humility than I've seen him speak in a long time. I think if he can get behind Obama and support him and urge his supporters to do the same, then I think his supporters here can too! "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:54 AM:

" VoR: you do know what I mean by my questions; you're just avoiding the real answer. Funny how you waited until after the election was called to respond.

I do know what has happened and that's why I am afraid. After you get over your gloating and reality sets in after January, I think you and the others will be afraid too. Remember what his sidekick Biden warned about? Did you not mark his words like he said? Or has your selective memory set in again? "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:57 AM:

" To fp: Thanks for the morning laugh. "

Voice of reason wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:41 AM:

" To Amuck3, I don't know what you mean. Barack Obama has been elected as our next President. Why not stop all of this meaningless irrelevant chatter and start working toward helping him to lift this country from the place George W. Bush's arrogant, misguided and heavy handed policies have left our nation in.

Consider the importance of what has just happened on so many levels.

America has just made history and regained an immeasurable ammount of respect from all around the world. let's at least give him a shot at bringing this country together "

BILL G-A-R-R wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:22 AM:

" Would anyone who has tivo look at the kyron on FOX news and tell me if they saw the misspelling at 11:59 p.m..... 'Press-elect'.... instead of.... 'pres-elect'....' Barack Obama'? or did my meds kick in? Is this the end of FOX news? I so want to be done tracking their antics. [ last week McCain was a Democrat] Oh Yea, before I forget, hi DEW! And congratulations to all my fellow Americans, we elected a true uniter, not a divider. "

IT Happens wrote on Nov 4, 2008 10:27 PM:

" That was the best speech McCain has given this entire compaign. To bad he didnt come off as that understanding during the campaign. All of those negative attacks that they put out hurt him far more then helped. Way to show some class J-Mac. I half expected the Reps to come out screaming that it was fixed. "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 4, 2008 7:18 PM:

" To Jim: I know the folks involved and it isn't true, but I did post the rest of the comment as you mentioned. "

Vetter wrote on Nov 4, 2008 7:15 PM:

" MOT; With technology today, we would see oil a lot sooner than you think. We haven't built a refinery or Nuclear plant in decades, stopped by the left.
You libs always say "We can't drill our way out of this" or "we wouldn't see the benefits from drilling for ten years!" That's like saying, geez... I'm not going to see a degree for 4 years, so I'm not going to college! "

BIAS wrote on Nov 4, 2008 6:44 PM:

" BIAS, why would anyone want to read a bias newspaper? Sad. "

newspapers wrote on Nov 4, 2008 6:28 PM:

" I don't think newspapers should endorse candidates at all. I don't want to see my hometown paper as Republican OR Democrat. An editorial opinion is one thing, but an endorsement? "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 4, 2008 4:49 PM:

" Dew, perhaps you need to do some research on the nursing profession! Just because I'm a nurse doesn't mean I'm in a union! That one made me chuckle! Last time I checked the nurses in ND weren't unionized!! You assume alot which is part of your problem! And no, that's not the ONLY reason I voted for Obama! Jim, drilling now won't solve the problem immediately, that's already been discussed and PROVEN! It will be years before we see the results, and had Bush done something eight years ago, instead of giving everyone tax rebates and telling them to go shopping, we would be THAT MUCH closer now wouldn't we?? "

Dew wrote on Nov 4, 2008 2:11 PM:

" Tim A says....We can only hope that Obama will make these changes ....

Tim, what a sad statement.... If you don't KNOW what he will do then why vote for him. He SAID he will bankrupt the Coal inudutries.
He does not want to drill for oil. He does not like Nuclear Power. How is Obama going to supply us with energy? Obama's words:
"So if somebody wants to build a coal-powered plant, they can; it's just that it will bankrupt them because they're going to be charged a huge sum for all that greenhouse gas that's being emitted."

http://newsbusters.org/node/25829?q=blogs/p-j-gladnick/2008/11/02/hidden-audio-obama-tells-sf-chronicle-he-will-bankrupt-coal-industry

He is a lover of Corn Ethanol, which we all know uses more enrgy than it procuces! "

Jim S wrote on Nov 4, 2008 2:10 PM:

" MOT, consumption is down, that is part of why the price has dropped. We would have more options if all attempts to other sources were not blocked by the left and by enviromentalists. We all agree that we need other sources and if Clinton would not have blocked every attempt to add Hydrogen, nucular and water powered energy means we would be sitting pretty right now. Fact is we need to do something now to hold us over for the next 10 years or so until we have something else. Until then, drill baby drill. Go McCain/Palin. "

Dew wrote on Nov 4, 2008 1:55 PM:

" MOM OF TEENS: Is that all you know? He will tax our health Ins. benifits? That is the ONLY reason you can come up with to vote for Obama in all the last 3 months I have seen you posting! Oh, and 'REDISTRIBUTING THE WEATH!
Which is SOCIALISM!
Oh, we all know that the Nurses Unions have been against McCain.... but, is it because of the the Health Benififts? Or is it because ALL Unions are ALWAYS FOR A DEMOCRAT?
I think if you spent more time checking things out instead of posting the Union talking points you would be better off. you would find out the truth! "

sigh wrote on Nov 4, 2008 1:37 PM:

" I'd rather vote for a VP who may or may not be qualified than vote in a president who's not qualified. Neither is a great choice, but McCain is the only reasonable choice. "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 4, 2008 1:26 PM:

" to voice of reason:
Yes, I can say it: John McCain. Happy? And yes, I have seen the commercial. Are you aware that Bush has kept you and your family safe since 9/11? Why are you you Bush bashers not acknowledging that very important point?
Would you care to comment about how you feel about Obama voting "present" so many times? "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 4, 2008 12:54 PM:

" To Jim: Your comment was great until the last line, that shot was too far below the belt to publish. "

Jim wrote on Nov 4, 2008 12:51 PM:

" The Bismarck Tribune identified how it undertakes endorsements in a June 1, 2008 article -- endorsemants are done by concensus or plurality of its editorial board. At this time its editorial board consists of 5 people: Brian Kroshus (BT publisher), John Irby (BT editor), Ken Rogers (BT managing editor), Steve Wallick (city editor) and Libby Simes (BT comptroller). Perhaps of greater interest is how North Dakota and daily newspapers in the northern great plains rank in terms of newspaper endorsements across the country. According to the newspaper web page http://www.editorandpublisher.com North Dakota was one of the four states in the nation that did not have a single daily newspaper endorse Obama. Two of the other three, South Dakota and Nebraska, are also in the northern plains. Guess the newspapers are just more conservative up here. In a separate column Irby had some interesting comments about a conversation with a friend named "Kevin" who indicated Americans just weren't ready for a black president. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 4, 2008 12:08 PM:

" "he is certainly better than Obama.."

ABE, in what way?? I have yet to see that he will do anything different than GWB, other than TAX our health insurances BENEFITS, that is! "

VoR wrote on Nov 4, 2008 11:50 AM:

" Oh, Amuck3, BTW, good point, After today quoting that ad will essentially be beating a dead elephant. A very dead elephant. "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 4, 2008 11:44 AM:

" To Amuck3, Not that it would matter to you, but if you've actually seen the commercial that you've referred to, you might notice that the person in it who says that McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time is...(say it with me here)......John McCain.

It looks like tens of millions of Americans will be present at voting booths today. What a great country!

I wonder how many of them are influenced by the Bismarck Tribune's endorsement? We should know well before midnight. "

Personal discretion wrote on Nov 4, 2008 11:19 AM:

" Everyone who wants a nuclear power plant down the road from them raise your hand. "

ABE wrote on Nov 4, 2008 10:57 AM:

" I can't say that McCain is the right choice for president but he is certainly better than Obama. "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 4, 2008 10:26 AM:

" Jimmy S, what will keep the price of oil and gasoline down is COMPETITION!! When people have "other options" prices go down!! The price of gasoline has dropped even now!! Has demand gone down?? I doubt it! The fact that prices have dropped even though we still "demand" it just SHOWS that the prices didn't have to be that high to begin with and that a lot of gouging and fleecing is going on! I don't call that run by supply and demand, I call that GREED!! You can lay out all the economics theories you want to, the fact is... greed is still GREED!! "

JIm S wrote on Nov 4, 2008 10:03 AM:

" Timmy A, What do you suppose we use to fuel our cars? The only thing we have available at this time is gas from these oil companies. Since the price is determined by supply and demand. We need to drill to keep supplies higher than the demand. If your liberals and left wing enviromentalists would not have band refinaries and nucular power plants the past 30 years, We might not be paying the prices we are today. Obama has no plan that is good, he plans to bankrupt coal companies, not good for ND. Get with it or please stay home. "

Tim A wrote on Nov 4, 2008 9:21 AM:

" McCain and Palin are Just Like Bush and Cheney Bought and paid for for the Oil Companies, Drill baby drill, tIn Alaska, Palin has allowed BP Alaska and cheveron to pump billions of Gallons of solvents(toxic waste) into the rich fisheries of the cook inlet and in addition she has repealed Measure 2 a tax on the oil companies that will save them billions. And if you guys want WInd energy and the jobs it will bring just know that McCain voted against measures that would spur growth in renewable energy 22 times over the laste eight years. We can only hope that Obama will make these changes because I know Mccain/Palin will Not! Vote today! "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 4, 2008 7:16 AM:

" C3PO is right.
And all you obama supporters can quit quoting that commercial about McCain and "90% of the time" because at least he voted! What kind of record does your Obama have for "present"? Think people, think! "

Mike Q wrote on Nov 4, 2008 4:31 AM:

" Lets make this simple. Find the people who wrote this endorsement. Give them a list of things they might watch or read. Include Fox News, and Rush Limbaugh, ask them to rank the quality of the source from hopeless crap to excellent source. Only ask the people who had input on this endorsement. My premise is no well informed person could endorse McCain unless they read and believed something convincing about Sara Palin. She is clearly the most unqualified person ever to run for Vice President. Choosing her says so much about the poor judgment of McCain. Why are you so embarrased to let the public know what you read? "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 4, 2008 12:45 AM:

" Just one other thing...I couldn't help but notice that the Trib's endorsement didn't mention his selection of Gov. Palin. I wonder why? "

Voice of Reason wrote on Nov 4, 2008 12:33 AM:

" Big suprise! Let's see if this endorsement puts him over the top, even in North Dakota.

We'll soon see how well the Tribune is in touch with it's readers. "

Big Foot wrote on Nov 3, 2008 10:22 PM:

" Me defend right of Tribune pick McCain. But me disagree with choice. How Tribune think McCain fiscal? McCain vote Bush 90 percent time. Bush federal budget largest spend ever. Largest deficit ever in history America. How Tribune think McCain good for Dakota? Only energy? McCain policy crush middle income family, only help rich. Median household income Dakota just $43,000. McCain win, more same of Bush -- help rich 5% percent. "

WHATEVER wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:01 PM:

" McCain is NOT Bush? Well, like they say, if it looks like a duck, quacks like a duck, and walks like a duck, it's probably a duck. McCain voted with Bush 90% of the time, so I guess he's a full 10% different than Bush. As far as when "reality hits" I would say it already hit, and that's why the Republicans are going to get their carcasses handed to them on a butcher's block in the election. "

casey wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:42 PM:

" a tax payer voting for obama is like a chicken voting for colonel sanders. think people, think. dont let obama buy your vote. "

McCain IS NOT Bush wrote on Nov 3, 2008 6:54 PM:

" Finally, after it seemed all the media was endorsing Obama, the trib bucks the trend and endorses the right canidate. Good job Tribune! For all you Obama "fans", just remeber that when reality hits, don't blame me, I VOTED FOR MCCAIN/PALIN!!!! "

Personal discretion wrote on Nov 3, 2008 6:37 PM:

" Soorree...should have double checked for myself, but that said, if it was even one endorsement it was one too many! "

C3PO wrote on Nov 3, 2008 6:26 PM:

" Everyone wants change... then vote ALL of the congressmen and senators out of office. Vote in all NEW ones... and keep doing it. Until they would realize that they are serving the people and not themselves. BUT you won't, you keep voting in the same OLD people over and over. Kennedy is a sick old man, but his family doesn't come first... his senate seat does. Didn't Strom Thurmond die at his desk? He was re-elected about 50 times. Isn't that a little long to be serving? How about term limits on each and every one. And I want them to pay into the same social security plan that I do. "

Mike Q wrote on Nov 3, 2008 5:57 PM:

" Dear Online editor, surely you could ask the editorial staff to list what they listen to, and what they read. Would they be embarrassed to tell us? I am not embarrassed to tell you I read the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal everyday. I am not embarrassed to tell you I listen to NPR. I sometimes watch Fox News and Listen to Rush to see what a sorrowful bunch they are. I watch MSNBC with Kieth Oberman, who hits it right on the money every night. See, not so hard, now let us know what the knuckle heads that endorse McCain use for reference. You are capable of communicating with them are you not? What do they have to hide? "

mom-of-teens wrote on Nov 3, 2008 4:38 PM:

" If you all TRULY put country first, then MCCAIN is not the right choice! More Bush policies?? More trickle down economics?? More and longer wars?? That's not country first!! "

GARRY wrote on Nov 3, 2008 4:19 PM:

" TO ENOUGH; 2 years ?? It will probably take 20 years for anyone to fix the mess that the republicans have made!!
I believe there should not be any political party's allowed in our country!! All
that does is divide our great nation, & nothing ever gets done,or done right!!
That is like the communists fighting the nazis !! No one will ever win !! "

WHATEVER wrote on Nov 3, 2008 4:07 PM:

" To Enough: Democrats have not shown enough backbone in standing up against the Bush wrecking crew, so yes they do deserve some blame. It's hard to hold them responsible for the 6 years before that though, when Republicans controlled it all, not to mention the past 40 years of conservative dominance. "

Tim from Bismarck wrote on Nov 3, 2008 4:06 PM:

" I just heard Cheney made a stop in South Dakota to do some hunting. What are the bag limits on attorney's in South Dakota anyway? "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 3, 2008 3:36 PM:

" To Mike Q.: Asking what we believe and what we read is a very tough question. The Tribune employs a lot of people. I would guess that you would like to know what the people on the editorial board read and believe. I can tell you that they are a very diverse group, but I can't tell you specifically what any one of them believes or reads. I would be more than willing to tell you what I read, but my opinion isn't involved in forming the editorials (so it's probably not very interesting). "

To PD wrote on Nov 3, 2008 3:01 PM:

" We'll PD, you obviously will believe anything. "That's the most convincing statement I've read here..."
"Those who dont study history are doomed to repeat it." "

leftofthedial wrote on Nov 3, 2008 2:34 PM:

" Scott, the Tribune actually endorsed John Kerry in '04, not Bush. "

Personal discretion wrote on Nov 3, 2008 2:17 PM:

" Scott - That's the most convincing statement I've read here as to why a person should disregard the Bismarck Tribune's endorsement of McCain and vote for Barack Obama! "

Enough wrote on Nov 3, 2008 1:41 PM:

" To whatever. Don't you think the democratic congress that we have had for the last 2 years should take some responsibilty? "

Scott wrote on Nov 3, 2008 1:04 PM:

" The Bismarck Tribune endorsed George W. Bush. Twice! 'Nuff said about the worth of their endorsement. "

WHATEVER wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:59 PM:

" To summarize the endorsement of McCain: We are in very troubled times, caused by the Republicans, therefore let's keep the same outfit in charge for another 4 years to clean up the mess that they themselves created. "

This is nuts wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:35 PM:

" It is obvious, The Bismarck Tribune gets all of the facts, they do have access to them, reads them and makes an intelligent decision. Local democrats ignore all of the facts about obama, spin all of the facts about McCain, and make an emotional decision.

If Obama wins, and he may, it will be a devastating four years for our great country! "

Ken J wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:31 AM:

" Good Job Tribune. Some sanity in the most left of center machine attack dog against the republicans and McCain that this country has ever seen. It's nice to know that sensibility and common sense rule the day at theTribune. "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:29 AM:

" To Bill G-A-R-R: Feel free to attack the message, and not the messenger. As a side note, your political guess for the person your mentioned is exactly wrong. Remember that the editorials are decided by a board, not a single person. "

david wrote on Nov 3, 2008 10:02 AM:

" John McCain may well be qualified to be a leader.

Palin is not qualified to run a country. We should be very scared of her public statements about taking extraconstitutional authority as VP. She is dangerous in her lack of education, meaningful expereince and tolerance of differing views. She surely would be an embarasment to the USA as a leader as she already is as a campaigner. "

N.S. wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:31 AM:

" I agree with the Tribune's endorsement. It is too bad that neither candidate seems to be an outstanding choice. Both candidates seem to say whatever they think the voters want to hear no matter how unrealistic it may be keep their promises. Despite his own faults McCain certainly trumps Obama in experience and leadership capabilities. McCain/Palin has my vote. "

OBE wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:57 AM:

" After a McCain/Palin endorsement, it would seem like the Tribune can say goodbye to any chance of having a reporter on the Obama plane. "

Personal discretion wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:42 AM:

" From a North Dakota perspective, John McCain hasn't bothered to set foot in the State of North Dakota since this election began - pretty obvious what he thinks of the people in this state and the challenges we face as an agricultural state.

John McCain voted against America's farmers, opposing the 2008 Farm Bill and disaster assistance bills.

John McCain has said ethanol has "absolutely no value whatsoever" and opposes plans that would allow America's farmers to help solve our national energy crisis.

John McCain has helped large corporations while ignoring small family farms, opposing country of origin labeling and capped subsidies that would help family farms survive against large, multinational corporations.

JohnMcainRecord.com/rural "

LJ wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:41 AM:

" Listen to Obama tell a reporter that he will bankrupt the coal industry. There are many from this area that make their living from the coal industry. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMwBbl6RoIs&eurl=http://hotair.com/archives/2008/11/03/video-of-obama-coal-bankruptcy/ I am surprised that North Dakota newpapers are not running this as the front page story. "

offthegrid wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:37 AM:

" Here's what the great Repugnican majority has done for all us via "incentives for business":
Google the Government Accounting Office, executive pay & average American income to verify. Lower 90% of American workers; from 1976 to 2006, incomes rose 2.3% to an average of $38,800. Upper10% of American; from1976 to 2006, incomes rose 57% to an average of $195,000 In other words, 45% of American workers earn $0 to $38,800 per year, 45% earn $38,800 to $77,600 per year. Of the 10% of Americans 5% earn $77,600 to $195,000 per year and 5% earn $195,000 to God knows what per year. The top 1% received more than 50% of income increases since 1993.Top 1% received 80% of income increases since 1980, the Great Depression last time this disparity existed. Ratio of average CEO compensation compared to average non-management worker pay is: 1982- 42:1, 1990- 107:1, 1994- 178:1, 2001- 525:1, 2003- 431:1, 2004- 431:1 For 1st time in 10 years, Federal minimum wage increased to $5.85 an hour on 24 July 2008. According USDA: 760,000 Americans are homeless. 2003 to 2005 a three-year average of 35.5 million Americans “hungry” 13 million children were “hungry or at risk of hunger” In 2006 35.5 million or 12.5% of US population were "food insecure" for some time in 2006.
You and Joe the Plumber are dreaming if youthink it's going to get better for average Americans. It continues to be a mystery to me why "average" Americans vote against their own interests by voting Republican. I'm beginning to believe that the blame lies with our educational system - people are discouraged from thinking for themselves. I don't know how else to explain it. "

To LW wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:26 AM:

" Very scary stuff, I don't think most people have a clue about Obama's background and current and past connections. Everyone should watch the video http://www.viddler.com/explore/CitizenSlim/videos/2/3315.449/ "

Hdi4onAQBWQ wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:59 AM:

" If Obama is elected North Dakota will be hurting much worse... Bobcat may just pack up and head out to Korea along with other companies that have factories over seas because under Obama the cost for them to do business in the US will go up. But here is the real kicker. HERE IS OBAMA, in an interview, saying that he will BANKRUPT the coal industry. Do you have any idea what that will do to the people of North Dakota???? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hdi4onAQBWQ Please listen to it, and please VOTE FOR NORTH DAKOTA by voting for McCain!!! "

Amuck3 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:18 AM:

" My opinion is that newspapers shouldn't be endorsing anyone; that's not their job. Their job is to report the news fairly and unbiased.
But I have to comment on the Obama supporters out there: Obama is a follower. You want "change"?? If you vote for him, I suspect we'll see change but not the change he's touting. Example of his tax income levels already dropping... think, think, think!
McCain will keep us safer than Obama. This is a scary time for our country and we need someone who knows what he's doing.
Obama doesn't have all the answers you think he has. He's not preaching anything new; it's just what everyone wants to hear and he knows that. One thing is true--he's not stupid. He just thinks we are.
Think about it and then vote for the right candidate for the job to keep our country out of harms way for your family and mine. Please. "

Mike Q wrote on Nov 3, 2008 6:09 AM:

" You might as well have endorsed the stone age. "

Daycare Mom wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:42 PM:

" Good for you Trib. I was starting to wonder there for a while! Go McCain! "

Local Mom wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:18 PM:

" If the media would report all of the news then maybe the folks voting could make a better choice. If you haven't heard the earthquakes reported in Iran last week were not earthquakes but Iran testing nukes. So with Iran flexing muscle, and all the other international crisis' going on who do you want to lead this country? The Trib has it right. McCain is the only answer. McCain values faith, family, life and the USA . He is the man! "

WHATEVER wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:18 PM:

" McCain is very likely to lose, but if he wins it will be more of the same: endless war, endless debt, endless lies, and endless corruption. 4 more years of darkness, hatred, fear, and division, which I guess isn't all bad because we are getting used to it, and at least then the Republicans can get the blame for the continuing catastrophe of another 4 years of Republicanism. I also noticed that there was not one word mentioned about Sarah Palin, the most unqualified VP pick ever. Picking Palin is a scandal in itself, but then again Republican scandals are becoming a way of life anyway. "

Common Sense wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:15 PM:

" If you think Obama is fit to be president then you need to get out of the hole you've been living in... please tell me one legislative accomplishment of Obama...nobody can, he cant even himself. In the words of Joe Biden... "The presidency doesn't lend itself to on the job-training." "

VoteObama wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:46 PM:

" to Gun Totin Republican

The so-called "Kool-Aid drinking leftists" that you spoke of didn't say anything when Earl Pomeroy was endorsed of Duane Sand most likely didn't speak up because the majority of the state approves of Pomeroy.

People who are speaking out against John W. McCain are doing so because they are intelligent enough to see that he is clearly a horrible choice for president. "

Bismarcker wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:33 PM:

" Socialized health care, higher taxes, illegal immigrants being tare of with your money, fewer jobs, pulling out of Iraq hastily so everything done there was in vain. Wow - why didn't I vote for the "Messiah". Please use your HEAD before you vote - the rock star is NOT the answer. This Dem votes McCain - COUNTRY FIRST! "

Gun Totin Republican wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:18 PM:

" To the Tribune Online Editor: Isn't it ironic that these Kool-Aid drinking leftists didn't say a word when the Tribune endorsed Earl Pomeroy over Duane Sand, but twisted off over the Tribune's endorsement of John McCain. So much for bipartisanship and reaching across the aisle. You'll see more of that same mindset if Obama wins this election. "

LW wrote on Nov 2, 2008 8:52 PM:

" I posted the wrong link on my 7:29 post. This is the one that will make most Americans think. http://www.citizenslim.com/ Watch the third video. "

Gun Totin Republican wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:45 PM:

" To Change: You write that the Democrats are for the working man? They crucified Joe the Plumber - one of the working men they claim to look out for - just for asking a question about tax policy! As for Rush Limbaugh's income - it is not a salary. He owns the EIB Network and his income is from advertisers who stand in line to pay for him to advertise their product because his show reaches 20 million listeners. I'm thrilled to learn that you are among them. Wake up and realize that your union dues are going to sponsor mostly Democrat candidates and policies which are not always in your best interest. "

lee wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:15 PM:

" This endorsement from this paper comes as no surprise. A bad newspaper publication making a bad endorsement!!!! This endorsment was all about money. You don't want to get the conservative majority in this state upset because it might cost you some advertising dollars. And from the state of affairs at Lee enterprises----They need all the advertising dollars they can get. "

Halatbis wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:07 PM:

" Hey, Mike Q: The McCain choice for VP (the one you call an idiot) is governor of Alaska. What did you say your job is, or was??? That is one of the standout characteristics of you Lefties and Dem's; you are so tolerant. Not to mention courteous, and polite, and well spoken. Kind of reminds me of the Al Franken. "

8675309 wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:02 PM:

" Thank you Tribune. I am in full agreement as are many people I know. Thank you!!! "

Back to 3rd grade wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:46 PM:

" You people are acting like third graders when the Trib doesn't have the same opinion as you. You are going to cancel your subscription? Isn't that what we call cutting off your nose... I guess if you think the Trib is so awful you should apply for any one of the management jobs and see how you do. And the disrespect in arguing with and insulting the Trib and on-line editor!! This online blogging is a service the Trib provides and the online editors shouldn't have to answer to or defend their way of doing things. if you don't like it, get off the blogs, or else appreciate the time and effort these people put in so you can insult and annoy others with sarcasm and immature behavior. And now, get busy and cancel your subscription and remove the Trib from your "favorites". And for those of you who are forgetting something: we are not electing Bush or Palin for President, you talk like Palin will be the president and follow in Bush's footsteps. I would hope the next president has a mind of his own, regardless of political association. Give people credit, for heaven's sake. And grow up and accept and respect others opinions even if they aren't the same as yours. You're acting like bullies. "

mh wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:46 PM:

" Sarah Palin is the best reason to vote for McCain. She is like a breath of fresh air.Sarah has more executive experience than the other three combined, she is qualified for VP. "

change wrote on Nov 2, 2008 5:53 PM:

" The Republicans are for business's, the Democrates are for the working man.
If you have a good business, something that is honest, legal, needed, people will patronize them. If workers have no money and lose their jobs, no one will survive.
Rush Limbaugh and Karl Rove have been the hit men for the Republicans for many years, they have spread their hate messages continuously, thru the mails and thru the radio. Limbaugh has made millions of dollars over the years, he is making 38 million a year now, who pays that salary? You can be sure it is not the Democratic Party. I am really tired of it and would much prefer to listen to or read something that is productive, and beneficail to all people.
Let's change the direction we are going before it is too late. "

repub wrote on Nov 2, 2008 5:52 PM:

" to "Model T"

Who is this "younger generation" your are talking about. Being part of your "younger generation" i do not simply vote for a canidate who beleives himself to be an elitest, with no experience, who wants to "spread around the wealth"..humm were have i heard that before oo ya socialism!!!! Also how does having an african american president become a "plus" for our country. Last time I checked america was a free country that no longer look at people as black or white, but a free country in which any human can achieve their goals in life. In addition to all you nayser, GO McCain!! A true hero for our country "

Matt wrote on Nov 2, 2008 5:49 PM:

" Harry Truman (the hayseed from Missouri) didn't have any foriegn policy experience when he had to fill FDR's shoes. Within weeks, he was briefed on everything he needed to know. Sarah Palin's lack of experience is not a big concern for me. McCain could have chosen someone else, though. I would liked to have seen Alan Keys in this race again. "

Mike Q wrote on Nov 2, 2008 5:07 PM:

" Do you guys read, or listen to anything? Take the time to watch Colin Powells endorsement of Obama, if this prominent Republican cannot get you to see daylight, it is hopeless. Nothing could do more to destroy the image of Bismarck, and North Dakota than have an editorial board that ignores the VP pick McCain has made. How do you explain his choice of an idiot? Your paper could have been a force for progress, but instead you have encouraged people to hang onto the small minded, backward, gun loving, gay hating ideas that are so worn out. Are you totally blind to what Bush has done to us? "

ND Taxpayer wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:26 PM:

" GOOD JOB BISMARCK TRIBUNE!!!!! I was wondering about the tribune after seeing all the comic illustrations about Palin in the paper over the last few weeks. As you all know, not even the risen Obama can do anything without the approval of the Congress, but I am going to remember all his promises he has made and just see how many he can produce in the next few years if he is elected on Tuesday. In fact I'm going to review my tax forms and check whether I will be paying less taxes than before or if I will have to get another credit card and put my tax bill on it and then maybe the bank will forgive my balance with the bailout that Congress just passed. Vote McCain and your taxes will be less. "

Noel wrote on Nov 2, 2008 3:51 PM:

" Finally the Tribune gets it right! My husband and I have been discussing that we might stop subscribing to the Tribune since it was getting so biased but you changed our minds! We are very happy that you are endorsing McCain for president.

McCain/Palin '08 "

Ann wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:56 PM:

" I know that newspapers endorse candidates all the time, for a variety of reasons. While I do understand some of the reasoning behind the decision for the editorial board of the Tribune to endorse McCain, I think they left out one extremely crucial factor in making their decision.......one word - PALIN! YIKES!!!!!!!! "

MamaMia wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:52 PM:

" Sorry Trib, you got this one wrong, big time. "

wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:44 PM:

" Oh come on people...if the Tribune would have endorsed Obama, you'd all be praising the Tribune, and happy as can be!
Just because they didn't endorse YOUR favorite candidate, you are angry as heck and dropping your Bismarck Tribune subscriptions.
Time to let it go and move on! And, no, I'm not a McCain supporter--I just don't see what all the whining is for! "

cspiff69 wrote on Nov 2, 2008 2:13 PM:

" Wow. The Tribune has finally proven itself to me to be a fairly unbiased paper.

It has endorsed both democratic and republican candidates; it has been in favor of both liberal and conservative issues. It has stayed true to what the majority of North Dakotan's believe in. I believe that the election will prove that to be true. And shouldn't our local/regional newspaper attempt to correctly reflect the views of its readership? It appears to stray from the national norm of attempting to subtly sway opinion to a single ideology.

The Tribune has now GAINED another subscriber. I understand that the inherent apparent bias of the AP can not be edited. But if the Tribune holds true to these standards on a local level it may survive the outflux of readers sick of poor journalistic skills. Report the news. Inform me in an unbiased manor. Thank you. "

out a stater- absentee wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:51 PM:

" Get out and vote ND, the nation has their eyes on you!!! I believe local newspaper should not support candidates regardless, however, I also believe that their decision has little to do with what candidate people select (I hope anyway). I am currently out of state for grad school and have filled me absentee ballot out and sent it back. I am excited for ND and all the young people that are stepping up, getting involved, and watching the news instead of MTV or some other mindless realityshow. I do not agree with your reasons for picking McCain, especially on the energy and environment. I believe both candidates will benefit ND (clean coal, local oil) however Obama's wind/biodiesel gives him the ege in both catergories. Health care, economy, and wars are a much bigger concept and the fix is tough for either. I am in health care and so this is a HUGE topic for me. GET OUT AND VOTE ND, THE NATION HAS THEIR EYES ON YOU "

Halatbis wrote on Nov 2, 2008 1:45 PM:

" To the Tribune Editors: in the event you are interested there is an E-Bay site with a special sale on suits of chain-mail armor in all sizes and colors---delivery before working hours Monday A.M.
As is so often observed: The tolerance of the Left to any opinion or belief other than their own is legendary!! Wow! talk about a snit-fit. Reminds me of the behavior of two year old brats. "

Model T wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:58 PM:

" McCain is OK but his VP pick isn't. I was hoping for Chuck Hagel or Dick Lugar.
The younger generation, seem overwhelmingly for Obama. This was evident in the crowds at his rallys. They see the world thru a different prizm. Thier young minds are not fixated on taxation issues but see human injustices ,like 200,000 Iraqis,killed, many whom may have never heard of 9 11 They hate wars and look upon this polite, well mannered, intellegent young man, one of thier own, as a messiah, who may bring peace. The world beyond our borders may share thier view and is probably watching . Obama being black could also be a plus. "He's one of us", and may put an end to wars. We should know on Wednsday if these kids of ours prevailed, "

fp wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:29 PM:

" Well at least you don`t have to pretend you are fair and balanced. Your right wing rag is now exposed.......good luck with that. "

Liberal media bias wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:17 PM:

" the editorial boards ringing endorsement of Palin/McCain has confirmed my belief in human greed. The anti-ethanol pro flex vehicle statement in this "editorial" is in line with the sense of self preservation this paper exhibits when approaching the questions that arise about any state agency but mostly WSI. The republicans and the North Dakota chamber of commerce dictate the content of this papers stories and editiorials. The injured workers and the employees affected by WSI are citiizens of North Dakota and have been betrayed not only by the republican majority that controls this state but by the refusal of the Bismarck Tribune to practice journalistic integrity to inform and protect our citizens. Your endorsement is not a reasonable considered opinion, it is a plea for advertising support from North Dakota business and government and it means nothing! "

Ha wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:06 PM:

" Well, I hope after Tuesday "the Tribune" prints a congratulations to our newly elected president, Barack Obama!!
If enough "sheep" are willing to endure another 8 years, let them- those with a brain in their head realize its time to change!! "

C3PO wrote on Nov 2, 2008 12:00 PM:

" You are very sneaky... endorsing McCain two days before the election when you know he probably WON'T win. Just to prove how fair and balanced you are... I didn't vote for either one, but don't want Obama to win, cause I don't trust him. He doesn't tell anyone anything about himself... I don't want someone to be president whose father is from a different country. He has alliances to dangerous people... "

old fashioned wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:15 AM:

" Sorry online editor: it's come clear that your in the middle of something that the higher-up's pushed to your site and now you, being on the front lines, have to deal with our rath!! That's unfortunate and another outcome of antiquated, top-down management (not leadership) placed upon the masses.....seems like the top brass of the "tribune" have enjoyed and still do enjoy the GOP - REP style of politics and media. Maybe those who "approved this message" with come forth and stand behind it, vs. placing you in the line of fire and relaxing on a Sunday morning.

To sammyhain - you are correct both (all) sides need to be represented here. the tribune is doing a diservice to our community by only presenting one view (which is undertermined to a personal view of one, two, few or many within their organization and to which all employees of the tribune are now accountable to support. "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 2, 2008 11:04 AM:

" To sammyhain: I am not part of the editorial board so I couldn't tell you if it is a vote, a discussion or if some votes carry more weight than others. "

Nadine wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:49 AM:

" I agree with the Trib for the reasons they mentioned. I also had a major problem way back when Obama wouldn't stand.. or reluctantly stood up for the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag of America. This is what our Fore Fathers fought and died for. This is what our ancestors came to America for! To follow a preacher who preached we deserved what we got on 9/11 for @ 20 years is not just a little thing.
I want someone who will STAND FOR and LOOK OUT for What our Great Country is.
I guess I am just a very patriotic person. "

Tasty Pick Bonehead wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:39 AM:

" I admire The Tribune's selflessness in choosing McCain to continue the Bush legacy inspite of the effect Bush-McCain policies have had on the paper's financial well-being. I sold my Lee Enterprises stock at $41 a share some years ago. Today it's trading at $2.50.

Yeah, you sure wouldn't want to change directions now. "

sammyhain wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:17 AM:

" To online editor: So did the editorial staff come up with this endorsement unanimously or was it done by majority? If it was a majority decision both sides should have been able to have their endorsement in print.

Leave the majority decisions or the most votes be the deciding factor on election but for now both sides should have had their voice. "

Dr. Amy Gillis wrote on Nov 2, 2008 10:10 AM:

" I am a Canadian absolutely riveted by the US election. As your neighbor to the north, and seeing how close the race may be in Montana and North Dakota, I though I would drop a line. I am a fervent Obama supporter. I think he is an amazing person; extremely intelligent, inspirational and has reached out touch to so many Americans (and those of us around the worldl!). He will help restore the worldwide respect and admiration of your great country. As a family doctor I too am 100% in support of his plans for healthcare. Please, go for it America. You (and we) cannot afford more of the same politics and ideas. Obama '08! "

old fashioned wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:55 AM:

" To Online Editor: oh yes, let's continue with the same old politics as we've done since the late 19th century.......let's see, maybe another 8 years of the same.....sounds like a plan.....anybody? "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:43 AM:

" To Old Fashioned: I don't disagree with what you are saying. I've always thought that it is strange that an organization can have an opinion, but this style of editorial process is a standard in the newspaper industry. "

old fashioned wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:20 AM:

" to Online Editor: that's easily solved by adding a by-line to your editorials, and not just putting these items out without someone or ones accepting responsibility for it. The reader has no knowledge of the Tribunes methods of deciding what to offer the reader and which members of staff are in/out of those decisions. If the Tribune approves the editorial, then it's those persons names we should see (not as there personal view but as a view of their employer and one they support by sanctioning such endorsements). "

Online Editor wrote on Nov 2, 2008 9:08 AM:

" To old fashioned: The opinions for editorials are not necessarily those of any single person. They are decided on by the Tribune's editorial board that includes several staff members. You are right that Ken Rogers generally writes the editorial piece, but it is not his single opinion, for that matter he may not even personally agree with some of the pieces. Please view the endorsement as that of the newspaper instead of a single staff member. "

old fashioned wrote on Nov 2, 2008 8:21 AM:

" Who cares what the editor of the Tribune (couldn't you have used the entire name (The Bismarck Tribune) believes is best for us and is able to post such tripe because we only have one paper in this town. What happened to being objective and using your site to inspire dialog and discussion by the masses, vs. believing, wrongfully, that anyone will be swayed by your old-fashioned approach to using the media to endorse a candidate. Get in touch with this community Ken, and rethink the roll of the Tribune as a "people opportunity to speak" vs. yours to edit or twist. Time to move the Bismarck Tribune to the 21st Century and rediscover ways to engage those the community and make us proud of OUR media and not just someone who you feel you can speak for. I would not like to be employed by the Tribune and be reading this endorsement today, knowing that my editor did not ask me to opt in/opt out of this endorsement, "

reader wrote on Nov 2, 2008 8:18 AM:

" We just has John McCain like leadership for the last eight years and it is not working, why do it again? If something is not working, the smart thing to do is to try a different strategy. "

Dave wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:47 AM:

" I'm embarrassed to be a Tribune reader after reading this drivel. This endorsement shows that the Tribune is completely out of touch with reality!! "

Halatbis wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:34 AM:

" Tribune---you surprised me on the McCain endorsement. You are right in your assessment that recovery is going to depend upon American enterprise and industriousness. The government cannot pull us out of this economic situation by taxing one group and giving the money to another group, that creates nothing.
McCain is the correct choice for our country at this time. "

BJB wrote on Nov 2, 2008 7:18 AM:

" Wow, I always thought the Trib leaned to the left. So in reality you presented both sides. Great job and smart pick!!! "

Angry American wrote on Nov 2, 2008 6:57 AM:

" I think I'm going to drop my Tribune subscription! "

Rugby Reader wrote on Nov 2, 2008 4:52 AM:

" I respectfully disagree with the Tribunes endorsement of John McCain, as published on November 2nd.

McCain is not fit to be the leader of the United States, as he has demonstrated in three televised debates. The antics and tactics of his campaign show that he lacks character and integrity. His choice of running mate clearly highlights poor decision-making abilities.

McCain has voted time after time against veterans issues.

McCain jokes about bombing Iran, while our military forces are bogged down in Bushs quagmires in Afghanistan and Iraq. McCain says its OK by him if we are in Iraq for 100 years. Clearly not presidential behavior.

Peace "

Post Your Own Comment

All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.