Sep 30, 2008 - 04:05:22 CDT
Let me ask you a question. When you go home to make up your budget or balance your checkbook and find you have a little extra cash than you planned, do you make plans to go out and spend it once? And then spend it again?And then maybe spend that amount one more time until you're in the hole instead of ahead?I know I don't, and I'm guessing you don't, either. But there is one man who'd like to do that with the state's surplus, and that's Sen. Tim Mathern.Already he's introduced two plans, one for a state-owned refinery that would cost upwards of $1.5 billion, and another for a $1 billion "tax plan."He also has a tuition plan that would cost upwards of $89 million, plus a whole lot of other plans he hasn't even stopped to consider the cost of, yet.
All the while, he frowns upon the prospect of a $1.2 billion surplus that the state will have, thanks much to the tremendous economic growth we've had in the past few years. What's ironic is he's tried to pass more than that in taxes over his career. He sure seems to hate that surplus, but he's shown he sure does like to spend it. You tell me if this sounds like sound fiscal policy.
So when Sen. Mathern says he's going to give you a tax break with one hand, I'd suggest you pay close attention to what he's doing with the other. He's a tax-and-spend liberal, and that's something that's never going to change.


Sen. Tim Mathern wrote on Oct 5, 2008 9:44 PM:
I am not planning on spending 1.5 billion on a refinery. A refinery can be built by private capital. The mis information about my spending plans continues from Hoeven, so as to divert attention from his budget. Sen. Tim Mathern "
FYI wrote on Oct 2, 2008 3:41 PM:
JB wrote on Sep 30, 2008 10:27 PM:
The difference is:
Mathern TAXES and spends. We all get that. That's why we elect someone in the first place. And it's the legislature who gets to tax anyway, not the governor.
I've read that Hoeven BORROWS - through the use of long-term bonds, etc., and spends. With a projected surplus of $1.2 billion, that just DOES NOT make sense. Apparently, the governor is more worried about the state's credit rating than about deploying the surplus for growth. "
Bulldozer wrote on Sep 30, 2008 9:31 PM:
DuWayne Hendrickson wrote on Sep 30, 2008 3:04 PM:
Dave wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:07 PM:
Dave wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:01 PM:
Mandan wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:31 AM:
Economic Conservative you were right about taking a look at Dwayne! "
JB wrote on Sep 30, 2008 7:59 AM:
You state that Mathern "frowns upon the prospect of a $1.2 billion surplus that the state will have."
One would think that since he's such a "spender" that he'd be lickin' his chops at the prospect of having that much bank to work with.
I'm just sayin . . . "
Economic Conservative wrote on Sep 30, 2008 7:11 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.