Sep 19, 2008 - 04:05:18 CDT
WASHINGTON - The Justice Department is refusing to provide statistics to Congress that would show how many crimes the federal government declines to prosecute on Indian reservations.North Dakota U.S. Attorney Drew Wrigley delivered that message to frustrated senators at a hearing Thursday, saying that releasing the information could compromise the safety and privacy of victims and witnesses.
North Dakota Sen. Byron Dorgan, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, criticized the Justice Department for that decision, along with Sens. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, and Jon Tester, D-Mont.
"Something's desperately wrong and we need to find a way to fix it," Dorgan said.
Federal statistics have shown American Indians are the victims of violent crime at 2.5 times the national rate, with rates of homicide and domestic violence much higher than national averages.
Dorgan has asked the federal government to elaborate on statistics released by Syracuse University that say the Justice Department declined to prosecute 62 percent of Indian Country crimes between 2004 and 2007. That includes 50 percent of reservation murders, 72 percent of child sex crimes and 76 percent of adult rapes.
Wrigley defended the work of the department and said the data would not paint an accurate picture of their work because crimes in Indian country are often tracked differently from other crimes.
"Indeed such publication would simply create fodder for false comparisons that would inevitably prove corrosive," Wrigley said.
Dorgan said previous congressional testimony has shown that Indian crimes are low priority in some prosecutors' offices.
"Unfortunately, some offices have taken an out-of-sight, out-of-mind attitude with regard to our obligation in Indian Country," he said, calling the system "a proven failure."
Dorgan recently introduced a bill that would aim to fight high crime levels on American Indian reservations by boosting tribal law enforcement and improving coordination between federal and local authorities.

a new reader wrote on Sep 20, 2008 1:56 AM:
bigpoppakdog wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:53 PM:
Dougy wrote on Sep 19, 2008 1:45 PM:
I totally agree that law enforcement should be incorporated like reservations in other states have done or otherwise dramatically overhauled. What I do not agree with is the idea that if Native Americans stop receiving their payments guaranteed by Congress, this will somehow make the Department of Justice want to reveal records outlining their lack of enforcement on the reservations. "
livewit wrote on Sep 19, 2008 1:30 PM:
L wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:31 AM:
MamaMia wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:27 AM:
just me wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:24 AM:
native women wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:00 AM:
All that you stated is true and most Native Americans are aware we are entitled to free health care (I.H.S) and compensation for the land and lives that were taken from our ancestors. Living on the reservation is not only a hardship but in the same breath it is our home. We need to start from the source of the problem we may need to have the state take over our judicial system, becuase time and time again our tribal courts are not accountable due to monies, polcitics or not enough man power. The people who break the laws are slapped on the wrist and given minimal sentencres. "
Dougy wrote on Sep 19, 2008 10:36 AM:
The article states the Justice Department denied the request not Native Americans, so your anger would be better directed to them. Secondly, all monies received by Tribes from the Federal Government are payments for land and mineral resources. These were guaranteed by treaties with the Congress to be in perpetuity (forever). This will not change no matter how you vote or who gets elected. I don't mean to be condescending but it makes you look very ignorant when you comment on articles without any knowledge or understanding of the subject at hand. As a Native American - I too am outraged that these records are not released, for one because they aren't deemed confidential anywhere else, and secondly the Justice Department is supposed to be transparent. However I repeat for anyone that might be confused, the Justice Department is a branch of the US Government and not a tribal entity. "
Columbus Decendent wrote on Sep 19, 2008 9:44 AM:
Chatter wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:08 AM:
Enough Already wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:07 AM:
Grumpy Old Republican wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:04 AM:
Why Not wrote on Sep 19, 2008 7:28 AM:
No name wrote on Sep 19, 2008 4:59 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.