Sep 17, 2008 - 04:05:15 CDT
An advisory board is recommending $76 million in salary and benefit increases for North Dakota state government workers over two years, a proposal that Gov. John Hoeven says may need to be reworked.The State Employees Compensation Commission's proposal would provide money for 4 percent pay rises in 2009 and 2010. The percentage increase would not apply across the board, but each worker would get a minimum $75 monthly raise.
In addition, the recommendation asks Hoeven to raise the brackets within North Dakota's government system that are used to set employee pay.
North Dakota's state personnel system has 20 pay grades for employees who have civil service protection, each with a minimum and maximum salary. The recommended 8.1 percent increase would be used to raise salaries within those pay grades, not to give each worker an 8.1 percent rise.
Hoeven said Tuesday the proposed 4 percent pay increases could be sweetened and coupled with an "equity pool" of money. The equity pool would be earmarked for giving higher raises for government jobs that are paid much less than comparable private employment, Hoeven said.
The 8.1 percent increase for raising state pay brackets "sounds a little high," the governor said. "In terms of the 4 percent each year, we'll do that. I think we can do more than that."
Gary Feist, who is president of the North Dakota Public Employees Association, said the commission's recommendation was a welcome effort to make pay for state government jobs more competitive with the private sector.
Feist said an equity pool may be a better method of directing increased salary dollars to jobs where they are most needed.
"The commission's report is probably better than I expected," Feist said. "But I'm not sure it is probably in the best form that it could be. Maybe there's a different way of presenting it ... so it is more understandable what employees are actually going to get."
The advisory commission also wants the Legislature to continue providing fully paid family health insurance coverage for workers, a benefit now worth an average of $658 monthly. North Dakota government employees do not have to chip in a share of their monthly health insurance premiums.
The commission, which is made up of state officials and legislators, makes pay recommendations for the governor to consider in writing his budget recommendations. The Legislature controls the details of the final state employee pay package.
Last year, lawmakers approved money for a 4 percent pay raise for workers in July 2007 and July 2008. North Dakota's budget year begins July 1.
Feist said strong pay increases for state employees are essential to help North Dakota government compete for labor in a tight market.
"The turnover seems to be increasing. It's not just in those specialized fields," he said. "It is now happening in all job titles, where people are finding different jobs outside of public service, moving into the private sector, because of the growing economy and the different jobs that are now available within the state."


GK wrote on Sep 24, 2008 9:49 AM:
Jim wrote on Sep 24, 2008 8:49 AM:
To Lets be real: The vision and dental insurance thats offered is crappy and thats a fact, you can check it out yourself, Most private companies that offer it in town have better dental and vision plans at a lot cheaper premium. Also for a lot of health plans some items are fully covered and some or not, and its not just the state BCBS plans. I was a underwriter for a insurance company so I do know a little about what I just said and like one poster said here give them the money that private companies are paying and they can pay the 100-200$ premiums(employee portion) that employees are paying under private employers. "
Health Insurance wrote on Sep 24, 2008 8:19 AM:
To Bis Prof wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:55 AM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:25 AM:
Thanks for the free punctuation lesson but you must not have noticed that no symbols are recognized in the 'Name' space when a post is made. Hence, Let's comes out as Lets. Check it out. You will not see a name header with a symbol in it. No charge ; ) "
Bis Prof wrote on Sep 24, 2008 2:57 AM:
Now, my health insurance does not pay my bills and I'm young enough not to care about health insurance. I say, give me the money! Also, i bet all the complainers are the same people who send their shockingly ignorant children to me and expect a miracle! "
Lets Be Real wrote on Sep 23, 2008 6:19 PM:
Sure. The state offers BCBS medical and prescription coverage with no premium cost to employees and also offers a group costed vison and dental plan for those who wish to participate. Some items are fully covered, some are mostly covered with the usual deductable and co-pay. Just as I posted - "Health insurance pays all or most of your medical bills".
It's a good policy compared to many other employers, from what I've seen. It has real dollar cost to the state (taxpayers) and has real dollar benefit to the employee so it should be included in considering what 'earnings' are when comparing jobs. "
STATE EMPL wrote on Sep 23, 2008 3:01 PM:
DOCR Employee wrote on Sep 23, 2008 10:17 AM:
LK wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:36 AM:
Settler wrote on Sep 22, 2008 7:15 PM:
At 'all levels'? Based on what? Salary data on 'average' and 'median' pay ranges for jobs in the 'upper midwest' including cities like Minneapolis? Good luck getting $90,000 for an intermediate accounting job anywhere in ND, even though that might be the upper midwest median. I agree, some of the entry and mid level positions are pathetic as far as pay but there are quite a few excellent paying jobs in the state system at the higher levels with bonuses to boot that rival almost any jobs in the private sector.
The problem isn't the pay for all jobs in the state system. The problem is the pay for some jobs. That's what should be addressed. "
mom-of-teens wrote on Sep 22, 2008 5:23 PM:
federal per diem rates wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:04 AM:
mike wrote on Sep 22, 2008 9:17 AM:
To Lets Be Real wrote on Sep 22, 2008 9:15 AM:
Mike G wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:53 AM:
The discussion here for the most part has been that state workers are underpaid for comparitive jobs in and around the state, add in the benefits they are getting and they are still underpaid and nobody has denied that because thats a fact. "Health insurance pays almost or all of your medical bills". If anyone has that kind of insurance please let us all know, we will switch. I worked in the health insurance industry for over a decade and the fact is that never happens. Yes they get fully paid retirement and health insurance, but they also pay a 100% of vision and dental premiums, like the other poster said if you have to travel you get to fork out money to get reimbursed back after a month long wait. How many private employers make you do that?. Please dont paint the picture thats its just a great thing. Remember the state employees part of the tax payers and paying taxes like you and me are. I worked for the private sector and also worked for the state and now i have my own business so I have been on both sides of the isle. Its also a fact that almost all state employees will pay the 100-200$ employee contribution that private sector employees pay for health insurance if they get what comparable private sector employees get for the same jobs. "
Law wrote on Sep 22, 2008 8:07 AM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Sep 22, 2008 6:32 AM:
Of course they do! Health insurance pays all or most of your medical bills, for starters. People who don't have medical insurance have to pay cash for their medical bills. All benefits have a real dollar value to them, even if you aren't the one paying for them. In the case of state workers, the taxpayers are paying for them. Many people have to pay cash for the items you receive as benefits. Not everyone has paid vacation and sick leave, for example. Or a fully paid retirement plan. State workers have a great set-up, for the most part. Those who don't see that often seem to be the 'lifers' who have never worked outside of government. "
WU wrote on Sep 21, 2008 10:21 PM:
employed by ND wrote on Sep 21, 2008 2:46 PM:
PAY THE WORKERS wrote on Sep 21, 2008 11:20 AM:
Temporary Forever wrote on Sep 21, 2008 10:14 AM:
We also only get $7.50 for our meals when we have to work out of town. Most private companies give $40 for a full day out of office. What am I supposed to buy with $7.50? Happy Meals are sure healthy and filling. Talk about a well balanced diet.
I think the state of ND could afford to treat us better than that. I'm much less concerned about wages than the fact that when I have to work out of office I have to front money and pay the rest so I can eat or stay in a decent place. "
wally wrote on Sep 20, 2008 6:57 PM:
mom-of-teens wrote on Sep 20, 2008 5:17 PM:
Mike G wrote on Sep 20, 2008 1:04 PM:
Going by the same logic if the business you are working for is making profits, do you want them to just keep it and not give you a raise? I bet you want a piece of that pie. Just because its state doesn't change that!Just like the other post said benefits don't pay bills. Yes its great to have good benefits, but its not going feed them. I own my own business in town and I make sure some of the profit that I make goes to employees in raises, If i say to myself let me keep it all, i will be looking to hire someone 24*7. "
to Wayne wrote on Sep 19, 2008 9:26 PM:
wayne wrote on Sep 19, 2008 7:18 PM:
MamaMia wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:02 AM:
Mike wrote on Sep 19, 2008 8:48 AM:
This is just my opinion but "reach for the stars" doesnt necessarily mean give up your dreams and make more money. To me it means in whatever you are doing if you try to be everything you possibly can be, you are "reaching for the stars". I just got done telling this to my 8yr old last night, if anyone thinks I am wrong please enlighten me so that I can correct myself with my 8yr old. "
jamie wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:49 PM:
http://www.grandforksherald.com/articles/index.cfm?id=86747§ion=news "
zzz wrote on Sep 18, 2008 5:07 PM:
Mike wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:45 PM:
If you feel that the state benefits are great, why arent you working for the state instead of whining about how bad it is in the real world. If you have a job where your employer doesnt pay any for your family coverage then yeah you might end up paying half your wage for insurance working a minimum wage job. Dont want to pay half your check, dont take health insurance, its really by choice you have the insurance, noone forced it on you. If you dont like it(its obvious you dont) go work for the state since you feel its so great there and you can stop whining because your insurance is paid. Its a fact that state jobs pay less than comparables whether you or anyone else want to believe it or not, but because its coming out of your tax money you are whining about it. The state employees pay taxes too just like you and I do. I worked for the private sector, worked for the state and own my own business now so i have seen both worlds and grass is always greener on the other side. "
come on my my my wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:02 PM:
Bis Prof wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:50 PM:
my my my wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:21 PM:
Food For thought wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:28 PM:
1) Student loans
2) Safe Highways ---oh ya we don't need roads
3) Safe communities
4) Consumer protection against fraud
5) public education support
6) parks, recreation
7) fishing areas
8) Land reclamation
9) and much more
to whom stated lets fire them and start over....easier said than done...haven't you every met bad individuals in private business as well as government?
Another food for thought..how many private business receive government help in many forms...... "
zzz wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:47 AM:
MamaMia wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:40 AM:
Just Curious wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:57 AM:
If EVERYONE you meet is lazy and unhelpful, perhaps it's time for a little introspective look at yourself.
Tough to lend credibility to anyone who uses such blanket descriptions.
And no, I really don't feel like getting into a public discussion of he said-she said with anyone who has such a mindset. But thanks for playing. "
Deb wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:49 AM:
Instead of whine about it here, is there anything you have done about it, like talking to someone about it and following up to see what action was taken. I bet you didnt. Quit whining if you dont have the guts to do something about the situation that you feel is wrong. If you have done this, common post the names and where these people work so that the fellow citizens know who you are talking about. I am sure you would know because you claim to have extensively worked with them. If you are here to whine, go find another place to post. "
to an unpopular view wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:45 AM:
An Unpopular View wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:03 AM:
dj wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:25 AM:
As Far as getting a new job, it is not always that easy. We do like serving the public and I, like every other state employee pay their fair share of taxes. It is not just the people who work in the private sector who pay taxes. If I want my taxes to go towards a decent raise for state employees then so be it! "
zzz wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:42 AM:
Mike G wrote on Sep 17, 2008 10:27 PM:
Facts wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:18 PM:
Cant anyone just be satisfied wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:14 PM:
JP II wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:49 PM:
Bis Prof wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:23 PM:
mom-of-teens wrote on Sep 17, 2008 6:29 PM:
Personal discretion wrote on Sep 17, 2008 5:24 PM:
I've been a state employee for almost eight years - I'm sorry but the "equity pool" used last year was a joke as far as I'm concerned. We hired a new person in our divison doing the same job classification as I do earlier this year...I'm making about $53 more a month than that person AND I'm just barely at the first step past "start". What's wrong with that picture? "
Cateye wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:45 PM:
That's about all I need to know that the numbers are too high. Anyone who has done salary surveys knows that the numbers coming out of neighboring states are skewed to the high side from the large number of jobs in higher-paying metropolitan areas like Minneapolis and Sioux Falls that affect the average. Those numbers wouldn't work here in private business and are just as invalid in government jobs.
What some see taking place with state jobs is the same trend many see with all earners in our country. The gap between those who make a lot and those who make much less is widening. The people holding the higher positions are getting larger than average percentage increases and large bonuses. Those at lower levels are getting the standard increase and don't even know the state has a bonus program. How does the proposed plan address that gap? "
employed wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:35 PM:
Real Motive wrote on Sep 17, 2008 3:48 PM:
Vote the bum out! "
to JP wrote on Sep 17, 2008 2:24 PM:
diggs wrote on Sep 17, 2008 1:59 PM:
So some employees, depending on their salary range may only get a 3.5% salary range adjustment and $75 up to 4%. Some will receive more. Since I have worked at the state I have had 2 years of 0% raises and several of only 2%.
If you wish to contact me and get the real information I am happy to speak to anyone -- I am a member of the Compensation Commission and do not belong to any Employee group. I represent the state employees who elected me to the commission.
digger3865@yahoo.com "
kev wrote on Sep 17, 2008 1:40 PM:
temporary forever wrote on Sep 17, 2008 1:10 PM:
TO jp wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:55 PM:
Mike G wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:55 PM:
Mike wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:21 PM:
Also, for those of you who think state employment is so great you are right. The flexibility and job security are nice. However, for those of us trying to raise families and build up savings, a 4% raise this year is not adequate. "ZZZ" I do think for myself and family, thank you very much! If you want to live in poverty that is your choice! "
jp wrote on Sep 17, 2008 12:12 PM:
NRE wrote on Sep 17, 2008 10:01 AM:
poor wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:43 AM:
Gen Y in Bis wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:40 AM:
Seen the light wrote on Sep 17, 2008 9:05 AM:
Chatter wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:58 AM:
Economic Conservative wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:53 AM:
just a reader wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:43 AM:
zzz wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:21 AM:
Frankly, if the Legislature would just pass a law that state employees would get cost-of-living increases, and then set aside a pot for equity adjustments and/or bonuses for good work, they could avoid this fiasco every 2 years. But I guess that's giving up the power they do have over employees. "
TK wrote on Sep 17, 2008 8:12 AM:
BabyT wrote on Sep 17, 2008 7:48 AM:
Cateye wrote on Sep 17, 2008 7:18 AM:
About time wrote on Sep 17, 2008 6:35 AM:
I, for one, am glad that NDPEA is speaking up. And it was not only NDPEA it was a bi-partisan group of legislators as well. "
To ZZZ wrote on Sep 17, 2008 6:27 AM:
zzz wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:33 AM:
snowball in july wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:25 AM:
before the ink was dry. Why even report this it is an impossibility!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.