Sep 07, 2008 - 04:05:23 CDT
Bismarck Tribune
(This is the first in a two-part series on the Conservation Reserve Program. Today's story looks at the issue of releasing CRP acres for haying. Monday's story looks at why farmers and ranchers are leaving the program.)
By LAUREN DONOVAN
RURAL TAYLOR - Marc Fridley rolled up hay the texture of stale shredded breakfast cereal.
Dry and crunchy, baled in the high heat of mid-August, it'll take the edge off his cows' appetite when it gets cold outside. It won't offer much nutrition. The bloom is long off the alfalfa by now.
Fridley wishes he hadn't had to wait until August to make 500 or so hay bales on Conservation Reserve Program acres, belonging to a landowner on the south side of the Heart River. He's grateful to get it, don't get him wrong. But he's frustrated that the government opened up emergency haying Aug. 2, weeks after prime hay time, which ideally starts back in June.
Fridley said he'll be thinking of that dried-up hay when hunters come to his rural Taylor farm this fall. A lawsuit filed by the National Wildlife Federation prevented the USDA from opening up millions of CRP acres for haying in a proposed critical use program to help livestock producers deal with the drought and high feed costs.
"Anybody who shows up from those hunting organizations that supported this lawsuit, I'll turn them down," he said.
Fridley said he's already sold off 50 cow-calf pairs and hopes he can scrounge up enough feed to keep his remaining 250 cows through the winter.
The North Dakota chapter of the National Wildlife Federation did not join the lawsuit, which argued that the USDA needed an environmental assessment before making such a sweeping change to reserve acres and wildlife habitat.
The USDA wanted to let landowners apply for critical need use, rather than limit haying to acres already in a hay management program.
A separate lawsuit by the National Wildlife Federation in 2006 resulted in more restrictive rules for CRP hay management. Now, on new contracts, hay can only be cut once every 10 years, rather than every three years.
Even without the latest lawsuit, it's not likely North Dakota would have been opened for haying any earlier.
Jay Hochhalter is the CRP specialist for USDA's Fargo statewide office.
He said about half of the county Farm Service Agency committees requested that the USDA open haying earlier than Aug. 2 in North Dakota.
But that date is considered the end of the primary nesting season for game birds.
It's a long-established date set by the state office, which partners on that issue with a number of agencies and groups, including North Dakota Game and Fish Department, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others.
Hochhalter said CRP hay - like any hay - does lose quality after July 1.
The intent of the program is to conserve land, protect water quality and thus provide habitat for wildlife.
"This is not a hay-management program," Hochhalter said. "The terms (for haying) are set out, and if people want to use it, fine; if not, that's their decision. Those partners have looked favorably on emergency haying and hopefully people understand that the North Dakota chapter was not in favor of the lawsuit."
Jay Elkin farms north of Taylor and serves on the statewide FSA committee.
It's his impression that despite many requests made to and by county FSA committees, any talk of opening haying before Aug. 2 was pre-empted by the lawsuit.
He said that date is too late - "impractically late" - in any case. He suggests the state's congressional delegation would have to be involved in a permanent change.
"This is about the National Wildlife Federation wanting to control haying for their own needs," Elkin said. "The nesting season is pretty well over by July 15, especially this year, when it's been so dry. We're cutting our own hay in June and by early July, the birds have already hatched out."
Tom France, attorney and a member of the National Wildlife Federation resource staff, said it's not right - and the court agreed - for the USDA to "walk around the law," when Congress intended the program to enhance soil conservation, wildlife and water quality.
He said the Aug. 2 date when haying is allowed on CRP in North Dakota has been in place for going on 15 years.
"It does reflect the biological realities out there," France said. "It's probably the right date. I know the science hasn't changed in 15 years."
Elkin said he thinks many producers are soured by the lawsuit intervention, for whatever difference it may or may not have made in North Dakota. He, too, believes hunters may feel more than autumn's chill in the air when they look for hunting access this fall.
"They (producers) don't believe a lot of these wildlife interests are seeing the importance of the producer on the land," Elkin said. "They're more concerned about wildlife than human life."
(Reach reporter Lauren Donovan at 888-303-5511 or lauren@;westriv.com.)

JD wrote on Sep 14, 2008 10:59 PM:
mh wrote on Sep 14, 2008 5:06 PM:
freemarketradical wrote on Sep 14, 2008 2:54 AM:
Westriver wrote on Sep 13, 2008 5:09 PM:
freemarketradical wrote on Sep 13, 2008 1:07 PM:
gerry wrote on Sep 13, 2008 12:49 PM:
tired of all the bs wrote on Sep 13, 2008 9:27 AM:
not to mention your food costs will also increase when you start eating imported food the food costs will increase many times over what they are now. the little tax money the taxpayers put out that goes to the farm bill, that actually goes to the farmer is next to nothing compared to what it will cost you if the farmers cant make it and th US has to rely on foreign food.
so stop and think a little before you know it alls do your posting "
A Little Attitude wrote on Sep 11, 2008 3:36 PM:
I stopped for coffee a few weeks ago after wed had a hard rain the previous day and overheard the following conversation between two farmers. Thank God for the rain. We really needed it. It was a bit much but we really needed the moisture in the stock dams. I ate, left and went about my day. A few hours later I saw the same two farmers along with some friends still sitting in the same spot. The conversation went something like this, its too wet to get into my field. Cant get any work done, just too wet. Always something, its always too wet, too dry, too hot, or too cold. Sure wish it would dry up so I could finish. Aint it amazing? "
freemarketradical wrote on Sep 11, 2008 2:25 PM:
SE Forty wrote on Sep 11, 2008 12:40 PM:
Edward wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:28 AM:
Mike R wrote on Sep 9, 2008 2:48 PM:
Dave wrote on Sep 9, 2008 8:25 AM:
SW ND wrote on Sep 8, 2008 11:17 PM:
I agree with you completely. I have witnessed first hand what bad hunters can do. From the garbage they leave on the ground because they are to lazy to carry it out with them. To tearing up hayfields because they are driveing where they are not suppose to be. Or acting like it is the landowners priviledge to have them come to hunt on their land. How many have ever gone out and asked the farmer or rancher if they needed any help with anything around the place. I am sure the ones complaining would never do that. They feel they can go where they want when they want. Maybe some of the ranchers or farmers should go and set up camp in there back yard and see how they like it. "
land owner wrote on Sep 8, 2008 8:51 PM:
Simle Mom wrote on Sep 8, 2008 5:14 PM:
hunter past farmer wrote on Sep 8, 2008 2:25 PM:
Gun totin fool wrote on Sep 8, 2008 11:39 AM:
Mike R wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:58 AM:
Mike R wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:27 AM:
to Mike R wrote on Sep 8, 2008 6:05 AM:
And no--to the poster who labeled me as as farmer, I am not. Actually, I am a stay at home mom, who also hunts. Upland and large game. Got me figured all wrong! We know many farmers, and honestly cannot say the ones we know are "slobbiest" (is there such a word?) I can understand a small-town, backwoods farming community doing something like that, like where you are from, but not the farmers around here. Sorry. "
Mike R wrote on Sep 8, 2008 2:08 AM:
NDHunter wrote on Sep 7, 2008 10:47 PM:
popeye wrote on Sep 7, 2008 7:40 PM:
Dakotan wrote on Sep 7, 2008 7:04 PM:
TO to Mike R wrote on Sep 7, 2008 5:46 PM:
I come from a farming community although I am not a farmer. I do know a lot of them and they are thee slobbiest of slob hunters there are. I heard them tell stories of cutting fences to sneak in on the neighbors land, I see them shoot and waist wildlife as the meat does not compare to the cattle they raise. A true hunter does not do these things. He is gracious and respects the land and wildlife! As I do! "
sportsman wrote on Sep 7, 2008 2:10 PM:
to Mike R wrote on Sep 7, 2008 1:35 PM:
Until you are in a farmer's shoes, don't say the things you say. (didn't your mama teach you ' if you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all'? She should have.) "
This is nuts wrote on Sep 7, 2008 12:18 PM:
Bil wrote on Sep 7, 2008 11:36 AM:
ND native wrote on Sep 7, 2008 11:28 AM:
dof wrote on Sep 7, 2008 11:12 AM:
Hunters may want to realize CRP is dying as a farm program. It has to do with the way the penalties are written, unrealistic weed control guidelines, and attitudes of people wanting to use CRP for recreation, as well as, rental rates, this failure to open it expeditiously for haying in a drought disaster area is just another nail in the coffin.
Farmer/Ranchers in the western part of the state, didn't want the CRP opened they needed it opened. When grazing and haying production is 10% of what is considered a normal year, it is a natural disaster, therefor the request for 'emergency haying/grazing'
Yes, hunters are right some farmer/ranchers do work the system, but in this case a lot of good farmer/ranchers got hurt. Just like landowners come across slob hunters, and good sportmen catch the blame. And as I see it in 5 years, CRP won't be an issue for either side. Its too bad. "
ND Conservative wrote on Sep 7, 2008 11:07 AM:
Mike R wrote on Sep 7, 2008 10:00 AM:
Vardell wrote on Sep 7, 2008 9:23 AM:
Show me wrote on Sep 7, 2008 8:47 AM:
http://www.fishingbuddy.com/forums/topic.php?fid=167&tid=31487 "
Bil wrote on Sep 7, 2008 8:38 AM:
Mike R wrote on Sep 7, 2008 8:08 AM:
Mike R wrote on Sep 7, 2008 8:06 AM:
SW Hunter wrote on Sep 7, 2008 7:32 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.