Sep 03, 2008 - 04:05:36 CDT
Don Hannu makes a bid to decide the global warming debate in his letter to the editor on Aug. 25. Don claims that all his information is factual. Let's go point to point.Do more scientists come out every day against global warming? What is the benefit of being a scientist who is proposing global warming (other than being a responsible individual)? What is to be gained if you work with the energy industry to say that global warming isn't happening? What is the cost of working against this administration and saying global warming is happening? In order of the above you have nothing, money and being fired.
Carbon dioxide isn't the predominant gas in the atmosphere. How much of a house's weight is insulation? Small to be sure. But how much can that insulation add to the heat retention of the house? We all need to keep in mind that we are not talking huge heat changes due to global warming. A change of a few degrees can make for disastrous results.
Does C02 have a short half-life? Yes, if we have not killed off the trees that make that true. Droughts, greed and industrial pollution are doing that exact thing.
Can the U.S. ever become an exporter of energy again? If we invest in the technology necessary to develop new and cleaner energy and learn to conserve we might. If we stick our heads in the sand and refuse to move into the future, we will continue to fall behind those who are willing to look to the future (falling even further behind in our trade deficit).
Motive is the key question in any debate. If you want to figure out who is lying to you, look for motive. The more gained, the greater the chance that a lie is coming. We know what gain there is for the energy companies. What gain is there for the environmentalists? Environmentalists actually lose money fighting these causes (personally and as groups). Environmentalists aren't trying to scare you. They are trying to save you.

kindergarden science wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:04 AM:
Even a kinder garden student knows that the sun heats the earth. Al Gore probably had medeocre grades in kindergarden also.
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2003/0313irradiance.html "
RJ Richards wrote on Sep 17, 2008 11:30 AM:
First Grade Science wrote on Sep 10, 2008 9:15 PM:
Vetter wrote on Sep 9, 2008 10:53 PM:
REX wrote on Sep 9, 2008 8:31 PM:
Buzz wrote on Sep 9, 2008 7:15 AM:
REX wrote on Sep 8, 2008 11:59 PM:
Snark Scientist wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:43 PM:
Projections show that within the next 34 months the snark population will have exceeded 17.4 trillion, demonstrating a rapid growth increase of 203% since 2007. This sharp increase may very well cause an overwhelming increase in drowning polar bears, income tax audits, bad hair days, and prickley heat groin rashes.
Advanced computer simulations demonstrate that within 42 months the increased population of snarks will be irreversible and may very well begin the end of the world. In the absence of actual data, these figures were synthesized in the same manner as those for global warming. We feel that if incompetent scientists can claim to make long-term global weather predictions in the absence of the ability to predict if it'll rain tomorrow, we are as qualified to discuss the short and long-term impacts of fictional elements.
An bill to introduct Snark-Credits into legislation is on-going with a hope of bleeding cash out of weary tax payers and businesses. A portion of these credits will funnel into the Snark Research Institution, a non-profit organization, whose goal will be to publicize the emminent world-wide threat as well as author new fictional threats for the worlds gullible.
Please visit: www.SnarkResearchInstitute.org/fictionalScaresForDummies/index.html
P.S. if you really attempted to follow the link, please stop procreating. "
MamaMia wrote on Sep 8, 2008 11:32 AM:
Mike R wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:33 AM:
break a CF bulb wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:40 AM:
Remove all materials you can without using a vacuum cleaner.
Wear disposable rubber gloves, if available (do not use your bare hands).
Carefully scoop up the fragments and powder with stiff paper or cardboard.
Wipe the area clean with a damp paper towel or disposable wet wipe.
Sticky tape (such as duct tape) can be used to pick up small pieces and powder.
Place all cleanup materials in a plastic bag and seal it.
If your state permits you to put used or broken fluorescent light bulbs in the garbage, seal the bulb in two plastic bags and put into the outside trash (if no other disposal or recycling options are available).
Wash your hands after disposing of the bag.
The first time you vacuum the area where the bulb was broken, remove the vacuum bag once done cleaning the area (or empty and wipe the canister) and put the bag and/or vacuum debris, as well as the cleaning materials, in two sealed plastic bags in the outdoor trash or protected outdoor location for normal disposal.
Do people realise that you can't just throw these bulbs away? "
xx wrote on Sep 7, 2008 10:27 PM:
Buzz wrote on Sep 7, 2008 5:45 PM:
yoda wrote on Sep 7, 2008 9:17 AM:
REX wrote on Sep 6, 2008 6:24 PM:
Dakotan wrote on Sep 6, 2008 4:01 PM:
Tommy wrote on Sep 6, 2008 11:15 AM:
NoDak John wrote on Sep 6, 2008 4:47 AM:
NoDak John wrote on Sep 6, 2008 4:32 AM:
Here is one example where the cost of doing so is in black and white.
William Gray, professor emeritus, works in the atmospheric science
department of Colorado State University.
"I've been in meteorology over 50 years, says Gray. I've worked damn hard,
and I've been around. My feeling is some of us older guys who've been around
have not been asked about this. It's sort of a baby-boomer, yuppie thing."
Much of his government funding has dried up. He has had to put more than
$100,000 of his own money into keeping his research going. If none of his
colleagues comes to his funeral, he says, that'll be evidence that he had the
courage to say what they were afraid to admit. see iceagenow.com "
Dakotan wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:29 PM:
Yes, some environmentalists are trying to save us but some are completely phony and do not have a clue. I know of one so-called environmentalist who is constantly writing letters to the editor and yet heats his home with a woodburning stove. How phony can a person be?
Environmentalism is a huge business in this world. Follow the money and you will find Al Gore and the phony carbon credits are at the end of your quest. "
NoDak John wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:47 AM:
Grumpy Old Republican wrote on Sep 4, 2008 4:06 PM:
Dew wrote on Sep 4, 2008 9:15 AM:
Law wrote on Sep 4, 2008 7:20 AM:
sherry wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:14 PM:
SRahn wrote on Sep 3, 2008 5:04 PM:
warmachine wrote on Sep 3, 2008 4:09 PM:
Law wrote on Sep 3, 2008 3:52 PM:
BMan wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:58 PM:
Anti-capitalist global warming believers, please answer the following questions:
1. How do you explain warming periods that happened prior to the invention of the evil SUV?
2. What is the correct average temperature of the Earth?
Any arm chair climatologist can shred the global warming theory with ease . "
To LAW wrote on Sep 3, 2008 2:15 PM:
Law wrote on Sep 3, 2008 1:15 PM:
Ward Cleaver wrote on Sep 3, 2008 12:25 PM:
Curious wrote on Sep 3, 2008 11:44 AM:
Bman wrote on Sep 3, 2008 10:00 AM:
Law wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:46 AM:
JONNY B wrote on Sep 3, 2008 9:27 AM:
Dew wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:49 AM:
If anyone would check into his movie, it was more fake than real! So, all he is doing is lying.... But, a liar is what he always was! "
bman wrote on Sep 3, 2008 8:17 AM:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/10/03/al-gore-getting-rich-spreading-global-warming-hysteria-media-s-help
Scientists depend on grants from the government to study global warming. There are no governmnet grants to do research to disprove global warming. If you want a grant from the government, you need to at least say that you believe in global warming.
Just follow the money. How easily this house of cards fell. "
losing money wrote on Sep 3, 2008 5:34 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.