Aug 13, 2008 - 04:06:41 CDT
Minnesota laborers filed Unfair Labor Practices against the subsidiary of a Bismarck-based company.The International Union of Operating Engineers/Local 49 filed an Unfair Labor Practices charge against Knife River, a construction materials and mining subsidiary of Bismarck-based MDU Resources Group Inc.
Knife River is an aggregate producer in Sauk Rapids, Minn.
Local 49 business manager Glen Johnson said the 25 workers at the Minnesota plant approached Local 49 for representation in negotiating a contract in January. After nine months without success, Local 49 filed the charges, saying that Knife River was not negotiating fairly and in good faith.
It's a contention that Rick Matteson, director of communication and public affairs for MDU Resources disagrees with.
"We've tried to negotiate fairly and honestly and in good faith, and unfortunately both sides have been unable to come to an agreement," Matteson said.
MDU Resources submitted a last and final offer several weeks ago that the workers unanimously voted down.
Matteson said they could produce a counter offer, but Johnson said MDU representatives refused new negotiation.
Johnson said he believes the company is deliberately trying not to come to an agreement, because after a total of 12 months they are no longer legally obligated to negotiate the contract. That period will end in January 2009.
"The whole world operates on contracts, but when it comes to employees wanting a contract so they can know how much they'll get paid, then they'll fight it tooth and nail."
The charges cover five key allegations against Knife River:
n Knife River refused to reinstate a laid off worker because of his (and his brother's) union activity despite seniority on the callback list.
n Threatened to deny benefits to workers solely because of their union status.
n Reduced the method and hours paid for union members without negotiating.
n Changed employment terms and conditions for union members without negotiating.
n Limited hours worked for union members by creating production quotas without negotiating.
One of the key points of contention is that Knife River used a point system to determine which employees to call back for seasonal work when business picked up.
"This points system was used to determine who they're going recall, and they never used it before," Johnson said.
He said this system ignores seniority and has been used to discriminate against workers with strong pro-union ties, while Matteson said the system is designed to retain employees based on performance.
"We have used a system that recalls people based on their performance - and the union wants to return to a pure seniority basis."
Another key point of disagreement is pay, and Johnson said in the last offer, some employees would be taking pay cuts of up to $5.
Matteson said this is because Knife River has lost $8.4 million in the first six months of 2008.
With the charges filed, both sides will now wait for a decision from the National Labor Relations Board. Until then, both sides continue to see the other as the problem.
"I would like to see Knife River actually come to the bargaining table with the people that are actually responsible for making decisions, not the attorneys," Johnson said.
Matteson said filing of charges have only hurt the negotiations.
"We've been trying hard; we'd like to continue to try hard," he said.
"And today's actions sprung us by surprise."

annon wrote on Nov 13, 2008 6:44 PM:
volunteer11 wrote on Nov 9, 2008 7:23 PM:
BAAAAA wrote on Aug 30, 2008 8:16 PM:
SoSOrry wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:12 AM:
Good Luck Employees wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:29 PM:
done both wrote on Aug 21, 2008 2:47 PM:
proud member wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:03 AM:
volunteer wrote on Aug 20, 2008 9:54 PM:
HELLO! Does the word VOLUNTEER ring a bell. All the workers are continuing to work. It is with the help of many other union volunteers who enjoy the benefit of
a contract that gives them vacation time and they choose to spend it helping others.
We also teach our children to work hard, fight for themselves AND HELP OTHERS. "
Chavez wrote on Aug 20, 2008 11:45 AM:
Union Supporter wrote on Aug 19, 2008 2:10 PM:
JDog wrote on Aug 19, 2008 11:09 AM:
If this is an informational picket and the union is not on strike, how can these guys find the time to picket if they are working as hard as you good ol union boys claim. Shouldn't they be getting back to doing the work they are under contract to do? I think they should discontinue the childish antics and get back to work. Then work out this deal as professionals, not with a temper tantrum on the street for all to see. Do you condone this type of behavior while at the mall with your child when then do not get what they want? Do you allow them to cry, kick and scream? I doubt it, so why do the unions do the opposite of what we teach our children? We teach them to work hard and fight for themselves. We do not ask them to act like 2 year olds whenever life throws them a lemon. "
Andy wrote on Aug 19, 2008 10:56 AM:
volunteer wrote on Aug 18, 2008 11:14 PM:
Thanks for the food and support. Your kindness and generosity helps us
in so many ways. We have e-mail support coming in from all over the US...we
are just starting to get caught up on the blogs. Thanks again and we will not
give up the fight. "
volunteer wrote on Aug 18, 2008 11:10 PM:
We know who MDU Resources are, and by the way, maybe a remedial reading class is in your future. There are no striking workers. It is an informational picket only and you don't see pickets in front of MDU headquarters downtown do you? Enjoy your reading class!! I'm sure the 5th graders will love you. You are the only one that
doesn't get it. "
jillyjosam wrote on Aug 18, 2008 10:30 PM:
JoJo wrote on Aug 18, 2008 10:08 PM:
Happy Democrat wrote on Aug 18, 2008 10:04 PM:
Free What wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:46 PM:
Azhrei wrote on Aug 18, 2008 11:26 AM:
"done both" has said something that is true...maybe you are just afraid to listen, like the rest of ND. Unions fight for the individual worker....they provide a higher wage for the workers....Owners like unions, because they expect to get the best results for their dollar...that is why they sign contracts. The union workers know what is expected from them...the owners know what they are paying for...
Now, your statement "When it's time to go home on a job, union boys drop their tools and beat their feet off the job site, ASAP!" is totally wrong. When the bell rings at the end of class....you leave. When the whistle blows at the end of shift...you leave. Union workers work up to that bell and whistle and complete what they are doing...so that they CAN go back and spend time with their families, or hobbies or whatever they choose to do. It is their right to do that, because that is what they agreed to.
I chose to be a member of a union...I also chose to move out of ND because I could not live at the low wages that ND business owners want to pay....
The comment was made earlier in this blog about ND being a third world country within the borders of the US...and I cannot agree more. I cannot disagree either.
When a teacher earns $20K more a year by crossing the border from ND to MN. Maybe someone should take notice and take it up with legislature. Just like the unions are doing by striking against MDU/Knife river. "
JD wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:11 PM:
done both wrote on Aug 17, 2008 6:12 PM:
level headed wrote on Aug 17, 2008 10:36 AM:
Bono wrote on Aug 16, 2008 5:45 PM:
Where do you LIVE? It's BismarCk. "
Jacki wrote on Aug 16, 2008 5:21 PM:
level headed wrote on Aug 16, 2008 1:32 PM:
Bono wrote on Aug 16, 2008 1:28 PM:
For your info - NO - I do not ever wish to work for Knife River, MDU or any other corporation. I work for myself and am not of a weak enough mind to have to rely on others to make my living. I am in control of my own fate - not praying to god each day that I'm not downsized or eliminated. And I make a darn good living at that. LOVE IT! You don't get it do you? "
REX wrote on Aug 16, 2008 9:08 AM:
steve C. wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:53 PM:
darnell lauf wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:00 PM:
To All wrote on Aug 15, 2008 12:06 PM:
Boiler King wrote on Aug 14, 2008 8:48 PM:
kenny wrote on Aug 14, 2008 6:46 PM:
No More wrote on Aug 14, 2008 3:27 PM:
You need to slow down and process what you are reading before you reply. In no way did I say anything about someone being removed, fired, reassigned or forced from their position because someone else is just faster at their job. My previous comments were all clearly regarding a worker that can no longer meet the job requirements for their position.
What I also previously said was the person who is the most qualified gets hired, the person who does the best job gets a raise, and the person who is capable of more and is qualified gets promoted, how can you possibly argue with that? The jobs, higher pay and promotions go to the people that deserve them rather than the person who has been there the longest and has the most seniority. Please any of you pro union folks, make an argument against this position because I would love to hear it. And by the way steve C. thanks for the bean counting reference, you couldnt be any farther from the truth. "
Pet Lover wrote on Aug 14, 2008 11:05 AM:
Bono wrote on Aug 14, 2008 9:46 AM:
They are a monopoly and the prices will keep going up - BECAUSE THEY CAN. Wake up people.
It's all about money. That's why Atlas and Pioneer sold out to them. "
hmmmmm wrote on Aug 14, 2008 9:15 AM:
Free-man wrote on Aug 14, 2008 7:47 AM:
You are the Union, the people that work beside you are the Union. You vote for your Union president and he does what your wishes are, to strike, to ask for a raise, to settle work related
issues, and to stop the snakes that promote themselves by butt kissing their superiors.
Most of a companies executives and upper management sign a working contract,, Why not the little guy? Why not us?? "
Angry American wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:48 PM:
Frosty wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:24 PM:
To Angry Amercian wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:27 PM:
signed: ex-union journeyman "
steve C. wrote on Aug 13, 2008 7:14 PM:
To Cory: maybe you should take a course in Union 101. If you are working all the hours that you claim, I would assume that you are getting some overtime pay. You can thank the Unions for fighting for that benefit. Gone are the 16 and 18 hour factory days of the past as the Unions and their members effectively made that happen through collective bargaining and legislative changes. Could that be the reason that you don't whine. Next time, thank the Union for the overtime pay, unless you are letting your employer violate the law by not paying you accordingly.
ps. I also am not your buddy "
To Prices wrote on Aug 13, 2008 6:10 PM:
Most of you DONT get it wrote on Aug 13, 2008 5:58 PM:
CEO Pay wrote on Aug 13, 2008 4:01 PM:
Terry D. Hildestad
Mr. Hildestad was promoted to chief executive officer in August 2006. At that time the
compensation committee assigned Mr. Hildestad to salary grade K, our highest salary grade, and
increased Mr. Hildestads base salary from $525,000 to $625,000. While the K salary grade midpoint
was $750,000 in 2006, the compensation committee believed that setting Mr. Hildestads salary at the
midpoint would have been premature given his new promotion to the position. In addition, the
committee also decided that it would not give Mr. Hildestad a salary increase in January 2007 and
took this into consideration when increasing his salary to $625,000. "
Bob wrote on Aug 13, 2008 3:45 PM:
Look at the MDU holdings in the aggregate industry and tell me you don't believe that the more "market share" they have the more they can "dictate" what to pay their workers out in the field. Without the protection of a union, coupled with a lock on the aggregate business, MDU could and probably would drive wages down dramatically. As some of you anti-union folks suggest that workers just "grin and bear it" that mind-set would play right into the MDU bean-counters hands.
More and more we see jobs that used to pay a decent wage now being paid "minimum wage". Why? Because people need to work to eat and there are more people looking for work than there are jobs. So, big employers like MDU and Knife River want to, and get to, call the shots and the worker can either "grin and bear it" with MDU, grin and bear it with another anti-union employer, or band together as a union and bargain for fair treatment.
Without the existence of unions (and the threat of unionization) all workers, both pro and anti union, would find themselves at the mercy of corporations like MDU.
I am not a member of any union but I tell you, unions ARE STILL NEEDED. Perhaps in these times more than ever. "
JP wrote on Aug 13, 2008 3:35 PM:
Dew wrote on Aug 13, 2008 3:01 PM:
Cory wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:39 PM:
No More wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:21 PM:
I'm not suggesting anyone be "put out to pasture" as you say. Obviously someone who is 60 years old with 40 years of experience should have a lot to offer an employer, but if they are no longer able to perform their job perhaps they can use their skills in a different manner such as supervisory, training, etc. Im not suggesting they be replaced by a 20 year old worker simply because they are old. However, Im also not in favor of promoting and or hiring individuals simply because they have been there the longest.
Also note, this country has laws that prohibit any older employee from being fired simply because of their age as you have suggested. We dont need and never will need any unions to protect workers when we now have laws in place that already do so.
So here is a question back to you, if a 60 year old worker with 40 years of experience can no longer meet their job requirements after reasonable accommodations have been made by their employer would you keep that individual in that job and hire someone else to pick up his slack or would you try to offer other opportunities to that individual and replace him with someone that can meet the job requirements? The union way would be to hire an additional employee and have two people doing the job of one. The non union way would be look for opportunities for that experienced employee in areas where they can meet the job requirements and possible help others become better at their job through their 40 years of experience while replacing him with someone that can meet all of the job requirements of the other job. "
Angry American wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:01 PM:
steve C. wrote on Aug 13, 2008 12:57 PM:
to kinny, you don't have to go to work and "grin and bear it" you can organize and get your fair share of the pie.
To Average: are you saying that the mismanagement of the steel mills had nothing to do with their demise? And how about the automakers mismanagement of their own. they haven't kept up with what the buyers wanted.
To No More: So when a 60 year old employee with 40 years of service is no longer as productive as the twenty year old because of his age, we should automatically put him out to pasture? I don't think so.
To Cory: try working 50 or 60, 10 or 12 hour days in a row once, it happens on a lot of Union jobs
to IwantBunion: Where are these Unions standing around protesting, for I would like to pat them on the back for trying to improve their lives "
IwantBunion wrote on Aug 13, 2008 12:09 PM:
PO wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:36 AM:
What about before wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:15 AM:
Cory wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:01 AM:
No More wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:47 AM:
The whole concept of Seniority Rules is a joke. Just because someone has work at the job longer doesnt mean he is the best at his job, it doesnt mean he deserves to be paid more or treated with preferential treatment when hiring/promoting. Heres a novel concept, the person who is the most qualified gets hired, the person who does the best job gets a raise, and the person who is capable of more and is qualified gets promoted.
I hate to think how much money companies waste every year in negotiations with the labor unions. It would be more cost effective for these companies and their customers if the unions were no longer around. "
UNION wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:36 AM:
Average Joe wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:14 AM:
The Union and Democratic party is based on entitlements. They have both taken away the incentive and will to work. They loose site of the fact that a successful company will lead to successful employees. Very little of the union dues paid by employees are actually for the benifit of the employee. Most of the dues go to the the union thugs and the democratic party.
The Unions have driven the steel mills out of Pittsburg, and they are driving the Automakers out of Detroit, and all this while the union leadership gets rich and the union employers loose their jobs.
Be careful about what you wish for when you support the unions and the democrats. "
kinny wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:51 AM:
Prices wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:39 AM:
Ted wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:11 AM:
Grumpy Old Republican wrote on Aug 13, 2008 7:48 AM:
junkeR wrote on Aug 13, 2008 7:28 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.