Jul 11, 2008 - 04:06:07 CDT
I would like to add my voice to those opposing the large feedlot proposed for a site about 10 miles northwest of Mandan.
A large feedlot would result in the pollution of the air, the land and reduce the general well-being of people living down wind from it. As pointed out in a recent letter, persons living near such a feedlot, at Thief River Falls, Minn., became sick from the hydrogen peroxide fumes from the cattle's manure. Some mega-lots I have read about, located in the Carolinas, caused people to be sickened, the eco-systems around were badly spoiled and folks were forced to move from their community.
Confining large numbers of cattle to be fed out and fattened is an unnatural way to treat animals. The majority of cattle producers in North Dakota allow their cattle to rove on large pastures, but the existence of cattle in feedlot close confinement makes their lives (as a historian once wrote about the people in the Middle ages: "... nasty, brutish and short."
A farmer may have a lot of "clout" due to his money, with impact on the state economy, but that is not sufficient reason to grant him his wish.
The well-being of the residential population in the area must be taken seriously. The strong northwest winds we often experience in North Dakota could affect people far from the site.
The Morton County commissioners would be wise to deny the permit. Let clean air move - and people thrive healthily, all over this land.

Exasperated wrote on Jul 12, 2008 12:19 PM:
Exasperated wrote on Jul 12, 2008 12:02 PM:
FEEDLOT WOULD BE TOO CLOSE TO MANDAN wrote on Jul 11, 2008 10:24 PM:
mh wrote on Jul 11, 2008 10:08 PM:
getting facts straight wrote on Jul 11, 2008 9:50 PM:
B in M wrote on Jul 11, 2008 4:01 PM:
JimmyCrackedCorn wrote on Jul 11, 2008 12:42 PM:
How about this for a solution- signed contracts by the county and Mr. Berger that say air quality and water quality must be met or he faces still fines or will be shut down. Say .01 ppm over current levels, for H2S at the current city limits. Anything greater and he gets a fine. This should ensure that everyone is confident in the current distance. You could have a string of meters to ensure that the gas is coming from the feedlot, ensuring that the refinery and lagoons are not responsible. "
Closer than you wrote on Jul 11, 2008 12:03 PM:
Beesh wrote on Jul 11, 2008 11:50 AM:
It saves money to mass produce livestock for meat on a feedlot, compared to raising a dozen or so here and a few there.
I don't want to hear you complain the next time you want a reasonably priced slice of meat to grill as you watch someone blow off 16,000 firecrackers on main street during the next 4th of July. "
Exasperated wrote on Jul 11, 2008 11:21 AM:
meeting wrote on Jul 11, 2008 11:02 AM:
COME AND VOICE YOUR CONCERNS!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "
kev wrote on Jul 11, 2008 9:46 AM:
TW wrote on Jul 11, 2008 9:32 AM:
JustMe wrote on Jul 11, 2008 8:47 AM:
Are you sure about that? Maybe before you go bashing a subject such as this you should read a little more into it..... "
LL wrote on Jul 11, 2008 7:20 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.