Jun 24, 2008 - 04:06:45 CDT
The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe will continue to be known as Sioux, following a special election on the reservation.Voters rejected a proposal to change the tribe's name from Sioux to "Oyate," a word that means "people or nation."
The name change was adopted in 2002 by the Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux tribes in South Dakota.
In the same election, voters approved a new definition of tribal membership.
Until now, members had to have a one-quarter blood relationship to parent or grandparent who was an enrolled member of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
Now, enrolled members born after 1957 can have a one-quarter blood relationship to the Oceti Sakowin from any federally recognized tribe. The words "Oceti Sakowin," describe people of the "Seven Council Fires of the Dakota, Lakota and Nakota." In addition, their parents and grandparents must be enrolled members of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
This allows offspring of tribal members who intermarry with other related tribes to maintain their Standing Rock membership.
Voter turnout was low for the special election June 11, which election officer Dellis Agard said may have been because it was held the day after the statewide primary election, when people had just voted.
The blood quantum change was approved 381 votes to 180.
The name change to Oyate was turned down by a vote of 337 against, to 225 in favor.
The Sioux name continues to be in the news because of some question whether the University of North Dakota should continue to use the "Fighting Sioux" nickname for its athletic teams.
The issue is hotly debated on the reservation and around the state and the university is working to come to agreement with the tribe on whether UND can stick with the name, or change to one that doesn't reflect an ethnic group.
In May, the Standing Rock Sioux tribal council approved a moratorium on putting the Sioux UND logo up for a reservation-wide referendum.

Dakotah reader wrote on Jun 29, 2008 1:37 PM:
south bismarck wrote on Jun 28, 2008 11:43 PM:
for them again. Wonder how much the most needed election cost plus a day off
for all employees????? Why is your smart/educated chairman making these so called moving of programs because his educated staff have to babysit certain
programs. What's the cost of all these moves??? Again money going to waste unless your on the election board of course these same old families get to set on this board year after year. But again very educated people. lol "
Dakotah reader wrote on Jun 28, 2008 9:23 PM:
HollywoodNDN wrote on Jun 27, 2008 10:45 AM:
Standing Rock Dakotah wrote on Jun 25, 2008 7:38 PM:
Standing Rock Dakotah wrote on Jun 25, 2008 7:34 PM:
south bismarck wrote on Jun 25, 2008 7:17 PM:
there intelligence. Been counting the months lately??? Down to 15 months left and counting. Can anyone answer a question is the S.R. chairman's house his house or is it the tribes?????? Just wondering. Everyone have a good day. "
Bill wrote on Jun 25, 2008 4:29 PM:
I am not a sioux either wrote on Jun 25, 2008 2:07 PM:
The Tribe was closed the day of the election. The Tribe is probably by far the largest employer on the reservation. Obviously few Tribal employees voted if turnout was so low. The Tribe wasted a bunch of money giving their employees an entire day off to do something that would take maybe 1/2 an hour. This is along the same lines as the Tribe closing at noon on Fridays during the summer so that it's employees may attend whatever pow wow is going on that weekend.
Why didn't the Tribe have this special election the day before? They would have saved a bunch of money by doing it at the same time. "
Leah wrote on Jun 25, 2008 1:33 PM:
I am not a sioux wrote on Jun 25, 2008 10:57 AM:
I am not an indian either this belongs to christopher columbus, why he thought he was in India. "
Adelina Defender wrote on Jun 24, 2008 11:03 PM:
Standing Rock Native wrote on Jun 24, 2008 12:25 PM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.