Jun 18, 2008 - 04:07:02 CDT
Given Sen. Kent Conrad's well-earned reputation for financial acumen on the country's behalf, it's disappointing to hear that he got himself into a position of receiving preferential treatment in personal business matters because of his standing in the U.S. Senate.He says that without seeking it or knowing it, he got special treatment from Countrywide Financial in 2004, when refinancing the mortgage on a beach home in Delaware. A point was shaved off the interest rate. Countrywide also lent Conrad $96,000 in 2004 to buy his brothers' interest in an eight-unit Bismarck apartment house. Countrywide normally limits its loans to four-unit buildings.
Conrad has taken the initiative of seeking an ethics inquiry by a Senate committee. He's made a donation to Habitat to Humanity in the amount he will have benefited in the beach house refinancing.
Those moves help - some.
But it's damage control.
Conrad, along with Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., got tangled in a net of relationships involving Countrywide CEOAngelo Mozilo (who reportedly maintained a "Friends of Angelo" list) - whom Conrad says he never met but talked with on the telephone - and James Johnson, who was at one point head of Fannie Mae, a national lender and guarantor of loans. Conrad readily calls Johnson a longtime friend and says that his friend recommended Countrywide and Mozilo. More tangles: It's reported that Johnson received home loans from Countrywide.
Someone with the financial smarts of Kent Conrad should have known what the prevailing interest rate was for an ordinary borrower and that he was getting a deal. It's on Countrywide that it seems to have bent its own rules to finance the commercial unit buyout, but still it's connected with Conrad's name.
He should be forthcoming, now and throughout the lifespan of this mess.
Conrad should remind himself that North Dakotans' trust is his most valuable asset, and repair is needed, so that he can continue to be a capable leader.

James wrote on Jun 25, 2008 10:22 PM:
Hide wrote on Jun 25, 2008 3:42 PM:
ToBanker wrote on Jun 25, 2008 11:23 AM:
Dewdrop wrote on Jun 24, 2008 8:54 PM:
Why does HE qualify for a better rate than those of us that earned our credit rating and not because we are 'FOA'! "
ToHide wrote on Jun 24, 2008 5:50 PM:
Hide wrote on Jun 24, 2008 4:32 PM:
to LL wrote on Jun 24, 2008 12:09 PM:
RLT wrote on Jun 24, 2008 9:01 AM:
Question for ND people: How does a Senator who was formerly a tax commissioner, with only a Senate salary get the money to sign a deal for over $1 million?? Something you all in ND just may want to check out. Looks to me like a good journalist project -- do the investigation, follow the money.
Term limits are the only hope for the US. We can't continue to establish a rich ruling class like we currently do in the Senate and house, Repub and Dem. Money opens the door to these people, they need to go. "
Banker wrote on Jun 24, 2008 6:26 AM:
To Dewdrop: If you have solid assets to pledge, good cash flow, strong credit history and have developed a relationship with a lender at the bank, I see no reason that you would not be able to get a discount from the desk (average) rate on many types of loans. "
Dewdrop wrote on Jun 23, 2008 4:55 PM:
Resign wrote on Jun 23, 2008 12:50 AM:
James wrote on Jun 22, 2008 11:17 PM:
James wrote on Jun 21, 2008 2:57 PM:
Getting a loan based on your financial records is one thing, getting a lower than normal rate (below what others with the same financial ratings can) on a loan based on you being a US Senator is the point in question. If a Republican had done this do you think any Democrat at all would let it go by? I highly doubt it.
And the fact that Conrad is THE chairman of the Budget Committee, makes it even more unethical.
The Ethics Committee is looking into charges by a non-government watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, that the special loans to Conrad, D-N.D., the Senate Budget Committee chairman and Sen. Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., the Senate Banking Committee chairman, violated Senate rules on gifts that forbid knowingly accepting a loan on terms more favorable than those available to the general public. "
waralan wrote on Jun 21, 2008 11:10 AM:
Me thinks thinks this is much to do about nothing.cwqaw "
xx wrote on Jun 19, 2008 9:47 PM:
kk wrote on Jun 19, 2008 1:16 PM:
Dewdrop wrote on Jun 19, 2008 7:34 AM:
We all know what Conrad did was unethical in this situation, the Dems can spin it all they want, the facts do not change! If a Republican had done this, would the Democrats posting here be as 'fair-minded'? TIME FOR A CHANGE "
seven gone wrote on Jun 19, 2008 1:11 AM:
influence peddling is not only unethical, it should be illegal. no wonder the country is in the mess it's in, with the nest of crooks in there, and stashed into higher places in the government, the way they are.
time for a change, all right. "
Matt wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:49 PM:
JB wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:21 PM:
tommy wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:08 PM:
westriver wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:45 PM:
Halatbis wrote on Jun 18, 2008 6:59 PM:
ND'ers: wake up and smell the coffee--Sen. Conrad is just as quick to line his pockets as the next guy--the difference is that he has "influence" to trade for favors rendered. "
just a hick wrote on Jun 18, 2008 6:58 PM:
Unfortunately the "ethics" committee will report no wrong doing, they don't want to open a can of worms. "
kk wrote on Jun 18, 2008 5:53 PM:
Politicans NEED to be held accountable by the laws that they hold us to~ I frankly think that Conrad got caught on this one~ how many other things has he done~ I say that ALL politicans should not be allowed in office for more than 2 years~ keep it clean and changin~ they get too comfortable and it becomes a great job for them with all the benefits and perks~ TIME TO RESIGN CONRAD "
young republican wrote on Jun 18, 2008 4:06 PM:
He lied. the senator lied. He didn't say I used my influence to get the best deal I could get. That would be something you should be able to get behind - I would to. He said he had no idea he got a deal! Do you understand? It is even sadder if you, as a self proclaimed Republican, say it is okay that he LIED ABOUT USING HIS INFLUENCE to get a better deal on his loan.
I do everything I can do to get a good deal when I take out a loan. But I wouldn't LIE about the fact that I got a deal. I would be proud and tell everyone if my banker (CEO, loan officer, or teller) gave me a deal because I was a better customer or had a better credit score than others. I AM a great customer with GREAT credit. Nonetheless, if I got the deal because of my position, rather than my credit and payment history, that would be an unethical way for me to go about securing a loan.
If you don't understand this I hope you are just a grumpy old republican and not a legislator. "
limitations wrote on Jun 18, 2008 2:18 PM:
Sheesh wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:27 PM:
Razors Edge wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:24 PM:
He still got a loan no one else would get based on he was a Senator. Whether or not he got a special interest rate doesn't matter. They should've never given him a loan in the first place. When a company goes against its own rules for a politician they don't do it out of the kindness of their heart. "
whatelseisnew wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:23 PM:
Grumpy Old Republican wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:10 PM:
foff wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:06 PM:
Shame on the Tribune for blowing. "
Soldier wrote on Jun 18, 2008 1:01 PM:
Loan wrote on Jun 18, 2008 12:34 PM:
Sen. Conrad should now do the right thing and resign immediately. "
rusty wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:49 AM:
Heritage wrote on Jun 18, 2008 11:30 AM:
In this story Conrad says the following: Conrad said Friday that he had placed a personal call to Mozilo in 2002 seeking a mortgage for the Delaware home. But he said Countrywide's rates were competitive with another offer he received..
So Senator with two different quotes, what are we to believe. Its the changing story that is nefarious. "
warmachine wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:59 AM:
NDer wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:58 AM:
Doesn't sound so nefarious when you learn the rest of the story, does it? "
Heritage wrote on Jun 18, 2008 10:45 AM:
Barney wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:45 AM:
NDr wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:31 AM:
kk wrote on Jun 18, 2008 9:11 AM:
He knew exactly what he was doing when he got the deal~ he just got caught~plain and simple~ and he has the money so he tried to turn it into a donation~ for a tax credit
He will NEVER return to ND~ that is for certain~ he is on his way to bigger things~ "
lmnop wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:55 AM:
TK to LL wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:53 AM:
scoob wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:37 AM:
Senator Conrad has been and will continue to be forthcoming on this. I have no qualms about his ethics and his behavior and I find this article to be just a waste of time......find some real issues to discuss and put it out there for public discussion, but forget about trying to put any issue to this non-issue topic. "
la wrote on Jun 18, 2008 8:22 AM:
Barney wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:41 AM:
Local Guy wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:38 AM:
Barney wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:30 AM:
Real Guy wrote on Jun 18, 2008 7:21 AM:
LL wrote on Jun 18, 2008 6:43 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.