Owner, officials disagree on horse injuries

 
LOADING
May 09, 2008 - 21:05:12 CDT
A horse owner east of Bismarck vehemently disagrees with an assessment that his mare's wounds probably came from sharp, broken juniper tree branches rather than an attacking mountain lion.

After a four-plus hour on-site visit, the USDA Wildlife Services's Jeremy Duckwitz joined Randy Kreil, wildlife chief for the North Dakota Game and Fish Department, on Thursday afternoon to announce the assessment during a news conference.

"It's absolutely ... . It's not a bush. It's crazy," responded Kyle Bergquist, the injured mare's owner.

His pregnant mare was part of a herd of horses in his pasture when she was injured Tuesday night.

The herd's dominant mare had a foal, and she pushed the other mares around, Duckwitz said.

"It's possible she was protecting her foal and pushed the (injured) mare back in the trees," he said. There was white hair on the ground below the trees, and the injured mare is white. Some of the mare's wounds were the same height as the broken juniper branches, the wildlife managers reported.

"Iwant to sit in front of those people. They are totally saying things I know are not true," Bergquist said. "I have a 22-year-old mare with a white belly that rubs against those junipers."

Bergquist said he was considering having DNA tests done on the hair to show it came from his white-bellied, older mare.

He also said he had had several people stop by and look at his mare and support his theory that the wounds were caused by a lion. He said he plans to hold a new conference soon.

A NDGFD handout listed other reasons why the wounds were unlikely to have been caused by a mountain lion:

n The attack was reported to have happened between 3 p.m. and 9 p.m., and lions typically hunt at dawn, dusk or at night.

n The largest horse in the group was attacked, not the foal, which isn't consistent with lion behavior.

n The injuries were not consistent with a lion attack or effective kill technique. Mountain lions kill their prey by attacking the neck and head area, and not the rear end, where they are more likely to get injured.

n The horse had cuts on its front feet and bottom of its belly, which are not consistent with a lion attack.

n North Dakota wildlife officials consulted with Wildlife Services in Utah, which investigates far more lion-horse encounters. "They do not believe these are mountain lion-related injuries, especially with no head or neck injuries to the horse," Utah officials concluded.

n There was no sign such as scat, hair or tracks found at the site or at nearby McDowell Dam.

n Duckwitz took experienced mountain-lion tracking dogs to the area, and the dogs did not pick up any scent. Using his dogs, Duckwitz treed and killed a young mountain lion in the Grassy Butte area during North Dakota's first experimental mountain lion season.

n The report that the deer carcasses found in or near the horse pasture were freshly killed was not true. District game warden Jeff Violett, who did the initial investigation Wednesday, collected one carcass and determined it had died months ago.

n Numerous deer were observed in the area the following day. If a lion had been in the area, deer would have moved out of the the area.

"Everyone who looked at my horses said they were going to deny this," Bergquist said.

The foal did have two leg injures and a wound on its chest, and its mother had a leg injury, Bergquist said. He also said he was told that lions did attack from the rear.

"We take these reports seriously and take our time to get it right so people can rely on us and trust our credibility," said Kreil, who added that NDGFD has no reason to downplay a lion report near such a popular area.

The bottom line for Duckwitz, whose job is to investigate encounters between humans or livestock and predators: "The wounds are not consistent with animal attacks."

"There you have your answer," said Bergquist. "If you're concerned about what happened, you need to pay attention. If you choose not to believe me, Ihope nothing else happens."

(Reach outdoor writer Richard Hinton at 250-8256 or richard.hinton@;bismarcktribune.com.)

   Printer friendly version
Owner, officials disagree on horse injuries
Comments

Kyle Bergquist wrote on May 10, 2008 11:54 AM:

" Id like to set the record straight on NDGFs report. It is filled with inaccuracies and half-truths, and if I were a reader trying to base my decision on their facts, I have to admit Id think a mountain lion was improbable as well. Being I have a 350 word max, Ill address only the major points.

The timing of the attack I truly believe was right at sundown, as Sabas 25 plus bleeding points were fresh & actively bleeding when I saw her, all clearly explained to G&F. I could have easily been the reason the attack was ended, as I was out on my ATV rounding up the horses at that time. Also, the report says its unlikely the largest horse would have been attacked. My 10-day old foal had an open chest wound and injured legs also. I feel our mare Saba was attacked due to the fact she is ready to foal anyday, therefore is slower than the rest of the horses, making her easier prey. The majority of her wounds are not easily seen as they are up under the tail. The worst one being 8 long and about deep. Her front legs or feet has they say, had no injuries.

If NDGF thinks she was injured in the pasture, why is there no blood, hair, or hide on the juniper trees? Saba was bleeding enough that it was dripping down the rear legs, and soaked her tail. By the way, the white hair that they found, was actually white & interwoven with reddish brown, which belongs to another horse of mine. The attacked horse, Saba, is solid gray, not white, as G&F state. They also feel the pasture is too small and the horses were not getting along. This is an open, unconfined 40 acre pasture, and all mares have been pasture-mates for over 10 years.

Thank you to everyone who has visited and given their support.
"

reader wrote on May 10, 2008 11:43 AM:

" I have not seen the horse up close, but I've been around horses all of my life. My grandparent had a mare that was killed years ago by getting run into a fence by another mare. I'm not saying that the horse was not severly injured at all. I'm sure it's bad, but why do I have to see the horse before I can have an opinion? Why did they not find one, not one mountain lion track? Why did Jeremy duckwitz's dogs not pick up any mountain lion scent? Why are there still deer in the area? Why would Lion experts in utah suggest that it's not a lion? What agenda would they have? I'm just having a hard time believing that a mountain lion came in without leaving any scent or scat, picked out one of the biggest horse in the the pen, attacked him from the rear, scrached him up badly and then fled the seen empty handed, without alarming the local deer population. I am certainly not trying to offend anyone because everyone can believe what they want but I'm not buying it. "

Just Curious wrote on May 10, 2008 11:31 AM:

" Didn't need to. Saw the horse on TV and that was enough for me to reach my conclusions. I didn't see3-5 parallel scratches over about 5-6 inches that would be consistent with a clawed paw. I saw random scratches.

Perhaps you had a better view, perhaps you were merely seeing what you wanted to see. "

to reader wrote on May 10, 2008 10:53 AM:

" "if you talk to cougar experts in Idaho, Colorado and Utah the will tell you that when a cougar attacks a horse it kills it." Below are several articles of horses attacked, BUT NOT KILLED. Happy reading.

http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080424/NEWS/589959951/1033/NEWS&template=kart

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/04/28/BAGIL6BLGB1.DTL&type=printable

http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2004/april28/lion-428.html

http://www.9news.com/news/article.aspx?storyid=74221

http://daily.stanford.edu/article/2004/5/4/secondHorseAttackedByMountainLion
I would attach more, but I think I may be close to the 350 word limit. "

Seen the horse MYSELF wrote on May 10, 2008 10:07 AM:

" So, reader & just curious, have you been out to see the Bergquist horse? I didn't think so. I have, and do agree with the owner as well as every other person who were at their farm. This horse would not allow anyone to get up close, to see the worst of the damage which was up underneath the tail and all along the rear. It's easy to discount something if you just sit at home and write on your computer. Get out & see the horse for yourself....I know Bergquists are more than happy for people to see the horse for themselves. As for the report game/fish put out....the majority of the report sounds like they sure doctored things up before they released it to the public....I read it, and it makes me wonder if it's even the same case they are commenting on.... "

reader wrote on May 9, 2008 10:50 PM:

" I don't think that the NDGF is denying at all that cougars are in the area. They are simply stating that they didn't attack this horse. I know that this owner truly believes that it happened and that's his right, but the fact is if you talk to cougar experts in Idaho, Colorado and Utah the will tell you that when a cougar attacks a horse it kills it. And in the rare occation that it lives, there is chunks of flesh missing and bite marks on the neck or near the front of the body. When a cougar get a hold of something it doesn't let go. Your not going to find a herd of deer in the area of a lion attack the next day. This vet in new salem that said these wounds are concistent with wounds of a cougar attack worked on a horse that belonges to a friend of mine. This horse had some bad wire cuts but she suggested to him that it could have been a mountain lion even after he told her he new it was wire. The point is everybody jumps to conclution and it's always gotta be a mountain lion. It couldn't possibly be that the horse got cut up by a bush or a fence cause that's boring. Also if anyone think that the NDGF is denying that there are mountain lions in the area, call them and ask them. And when the tell you that they may very well be in the area, ask them what your rights are if you feel threatened. "

Just Curious wrote on May 9, 2008 10:47 PM:

" Yes, but NDGF has also investigated other reported lion attacks on livestock and reached the conclusion that it was indeed a lion attack. Why would the conspiracy be invoked around Bismarck and not Hazen? Are there not ND residents there who have all the concerns that Bismarckians have?

Having been around horses for many years, I do not at all doubt that a horse could be pushed into trees and injured by another horse. I've seen them do it with fences, vehicles, and steep cliffs. There is no honor amongst horses that prevents them from injuring each other.

"

Gun Totin Fool wrote on May 9, 2008 9:26 PM:

" So, did the evil juniper tree attack the rear end and belly of the mare as well as attacking the foal? Cougars, tornadoes and UFO's...regardless WHAT you saw, you did NOT see what you saw. (Unless you have a badge, that is.) I don't buy the explanations of the experts. I won't claim to know more than they do by any means, but I also don't understand why NDGF insists on downplaying cougar sightings and discrediting those who have seen them or evidence of them. I know of two sightings in recent years here in Burleigh County that were never even investigated because "It wasn't possible" that a cougar was there. Perhaps if I see one around my farm in the future, I won't bother to call NDGF...but I might take a crash course on taxidermy. "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY