Creating future problems today

 
LOADING
Apr 15, 2008 - 04:05:06 CDT
     While politics is the art of what is possible at any given moment, it cannot ignore the dynamics of what today’s politics leave for the future. With the farm bill finally in conference, we need to recognize that we are creating an Achilles heel that will almost inevitably undermine long-term public support for the price support structures that are essential to maintain a healthy farm economy and rural society.

This Achilles heel is the failure of Congress to effectively target farm program benefits to mid-size family farms through meaningful payment limitations. I am not talking about the easily circumvented means tests that Congress is now reluctantly accepting from the Bush administration. Instead, what we desperately need are the fundamentals of the Dorgan-Grassley payment limitation amendment written into the final conference bill. 

While some members of Congress are holding on tightly to the heels of the farm program to keep the spigot wide open to the largest farms in the nation, there is a growing disenchantment with the farm program among groups that have traditionally aligned themselves with family farmers. This farm bill needs to take sound initial steps to target farm programs to serve family farmers. Otherwise, we will see more and more efforts to “reform” the farm bill by doing away with the very basic price support safety-net structures that are absolutely essential for renewal of the family farm system.

As part of targeting farm program payments, we also need to reform the system of direct payments that are a vestige of the 1996 Freedom to Fail farm law. Continuing direct payments in times of good farm prices make no sense. We should use these savings to underwrite the disaster program and provide an improved family farm safety net.

We need to remember the story of Achilles. You can hold on so tight that you create the very vulnerability that will become the basis of its future destruction.
   Printer friendly version
Creating future problems today
Comments

Norm wrote on Apr 15, 2008 1:42 PM:

" Sen. Conrad, whom I usually support, is really at a disconnect on the issue of farm subsidies this time around. He vociferously opposed Sen. Dorgan's common sense effort to limit to $250K the amount a farmer can earn and still receive a subsidy. Sen. Conrad, on the other hand, voted against this sensible ammendment and for the very rich farmers who reap over 70% of all farm subsidies. The truth of the matter is that family farms are in their death throes. The age of production agriculture is in its ascension and we have no real plan to deal with it. Conrad's handout to the largest agribusinesses is probably going to be something he regrets come re-election time. "

blt wrote on Apr 15, 2008 9:02 AM:

" Everyone has there hand out and the politicians in Washington just keep spend borrowed money. What a great system. "

My 002 Cents wrote on Apr 15, 2008 8:57 AM:

" The best way to be effective on this, is to not write a letter to the editor in a local newspaper, but to make the effort to go to the big population centers and get their votes and support (and ultimately the support of their senators and congressmen). Too much preaching to the choir here (and not even everyone here agrees). "

jh wrote on Apr 15, 2008 8:36 AM:

" How about farmers saving in the good years to cover the bad years? Why should your family business receive checks from the US treasury and not the family business on mainstreet? "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY