Open record laws level the playing field

 
LOADING
Mar 21, 2008 - 04:05:04 CDT
North Dakota has "sunshine laws" which provide that all government records and meetings must be open to the public unless a specific statute authorizes a meeting or record to be closed. These laws level the playing field between government and the public.

The open records and meetings laws allow the public to see for themselves how state and local governments function and how public funds are spent. The ability to see public documents is not reserved for the media or other government officials. Rather, every person has the right under our law of open government to review any public record that is of interest. We all have a right to know, for example, whether our property taxes are the same as our neighbor's or when the city is going to vote on repairing our street and how much it will cost. Open government leads to a government that is accountable to the public.

North Dakota's law makes providing access to and copying of public records an obligation of every public entity. Anyone may request records from a public entity without providing their identity or even the reason they want to see the records. The entity must respond to the request in a reasonable amount of time (a few hours or days). An otherwise open record cannot be denied simply because it contains confidential information. The amount that can be charged for the time it takes to find the record, remove confidential information, and provide a copy of the redacted record is set by law.

Anyone can attend a meeting of a public entity and anyone can ask to receive a notice of meetings. The entity must post public notice of its meetings and an agenda. There is no minimum advance notice requirement. For special meetings, only the topics listed on the meeting notice can be discussed. At regular meetings, topics not on the agenda also can be discussed. The right to attend a public meeting does not include the right to be heard.

In my experience, most state and local government agencies accept the responsibilities of the open records and open meetings laws willingly and welcome interest from the public. Sometimes, however, a person may need a little help to remind a public entity of its obligations - and that's where the Attorney General's office comes in. Anyone can ask for an opinion from the Attorney General regarding a violation of the open records or open meetings laws. Or, my office can try to resolve the complaint informally by contacting the entity and helping to get the records right away.

If a request for public records is improperly denied, or the amount of time it takes to respond to the request or the fees charged by the entity are excessive, the requester can ask for an opinion on the alleged violation simply by writing to my office with information about the request, a copy of the entity's denial, and other pertinent facts. We must receive the opinion request within 30 days of the alleged violation.

Likewise, if a public entity held meetings without proper public notice, or improperly closed a meeting, anyone can write to ask that we review the alleged violation. We must receive the opinion request within 90 days of a violation of the open meetings laws.

An opinion takes some time to complete and is issued to the public entity with a copy to the requester. If the public entity violated the law, the opinion will contain a remedy to correct the error - for example, to provide the records at no charge, or create detailed minutes of a meeting. Even if it is determined that the government entity held an improper meeting, however, there is no provision in the law to undo or void action taken at that meeting.

I have always been a strong proponent of the open records and meetings law because I believe it builds public trust of government and makes government responsive to the people. The law gives the public an opportunity to play an important role in our system of government and my office will continue to safeguard that role.

For more information about your rights under the state's open records and meetings laws, see the "Open Records & Meetings" link on the Attorney General's Web site at: www.ag.nd.gov or call 701-328-2210. Complaints can be sent to: Office of Attorney General, 600 E. Boulevard Ave., Dept. 125, Bismarck, N.D., 58505.
   Printer friendly version
Open record laws level the playing field
Comments

Christopher Coen wrote on Mar 21, 2008 1:13 PM:

" What Mr. Stenehjem doesn’t say is that North Dakota government agencies find easy ways around the open records laws by conveniently getting rid of public documents. Our group Friends of Refugees met with Paul Ronnigen, the director of Children and Family Services of the North Dakota Department of Human Services, as well as two of his staff members that run the state refugee resettlement program. Although we met with them to find out why they were not making any progress in successfully overseeing Lutheran Social Services of ND’s deficient refugee services, Mr. Ronnigen told us nothing about what his agency was doing to make improvements, rather he and his staff members asked us many questions. The three government employees took furious notes during the hour-long meeting. When we later requested copies of these meeting notes we were told that the notes had been disposed of. Strange, why would they take notes for over an hour only to quickly destroy them?

These government agencies violate the open records laws at will, and with no consequence whatsoever. Street criminals are charged and booked immediately, yet when government officials break laws nothing happens. Funny how that works. Can we say “double-standard”? Can we say “hypocrisy”? How about “corruption”? When will Attorney General Stenehjem and Governor Hoeven ever begin to hold law-breaking government officials accountable?

Sincerely,
Christopher Coen
Director
Friends of Refugees
FORefugees@hotmail.com
"

Derrick wrote on Mar 21, 2008 10:07 AM:

" "Even if it is determined that the government entity held an improper meeting, however, there is no provision in the law to undo or void action taken at that meeting."

I respectfully disagree.

N.D.C.C. 44-04-21.2 provides that: "Any action that is a product ofa violation of section 44-04-19, 44-04-20, or 44-04-21 is voidable by a court in a civil action authorized by this section."
"

Wayne just proved one of the whistleblower claims wrote on Mar 21, 2008 8:56 AM:

" Thank you, Wayne, for proving the claims of WSI whistleblowers Peltz and Long. On October 22, 2007, they both requested protection from your office and they each claimed that WSI was deliberately circumventing open records laws. At about that same time, Chad Nodland requested several opinions from you in connection to records that WSI was refusing to provide. You have since issued several opinions that WSI had to release the records. I wonder if you spoke with Peltz or Long on these issues since they were so obviously related. Maybe that is why it took your office over four months to make the decisions. Please make sure you forward this information on to Peter Welte so he can cross that one off. Proven claim. Next. You might want to also ask him what is taking him so long to investigate this case. "

Attica! wrote on Mar 21, 2008 8:08 AM:

" What is the penalty for WSI? "

WSI needs alot of reminding wrote on Mar 21, 2008 7:51 AM:

" You think Wayne would be embarrassed at how much reminding WSI needs. The recent decisions that WSI violated open records laws show they arrogantly and consistently try to hide public information. It is his special assistant attorney generals that are giving the advice and directing the denial of records. Hard to believe he has no power to get them to clean up their act. Bad reflection on the designation of special assistant attorney general. WSI's actions are intentional and not a mistake of law as has happened at that agency before. "

leo wrote on Mar 21, 2008 5:43 AM:

" WSI?

"

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY