Mar 14, 2008 - 04:05:09 CDT
GRAND FORKS (AP) - Five current and former tribal college presidents have decided not to take part in a photo shoot for a University of North Dakota student recruiting campaign because of their opposition to the Fighting Sioux nickname, a UND official says.The first round of the Beyond Beads and Feathers campaign began about two years ago with posters of nine American Indian UND graduates who went on to successful careers. The posters were distributed to reservation high schools and tribal colleges and displayed in the American Indian Student Services house on campus, said Bob Boyd, a UND vice president.
For a second round of the poster campaigns, UND had planned to take a group photo of the 14 UND graduates who are past or present tribal college presidents. Boyd said five graduates declined to take part, citing UND's continued use of the nickname.
"These are all people for whom I have a great deal of respect," Boyd said. "(The photo shoot) is something that would have a great deal of impact on Native American students as they think about their own university careers and the kinds of things they can accomplish. These are people who have worked very hard to get to the point they're at."
United Tribes Technical College President David Gipp was one of the tribal college presidents who declined to participate in the photo shoot. In an e-mail, he praised UND's programs for American Indians, but called the nickname "incessantly and increasingly a topic of dissension among the various communities - tribal and non-tribal."
The other tribal college leaders who declined to participate in the photo shoot are Cynthia Lindquist, president of Cankdeska Cikana tribal college in Fort Totten; Laurel Vermillion, president of Sitting Bull College in Fort Yates; Donald Day, president of Fond du Lac tribal and Community College in Cloquet, Minn.; and Elizabeth Yellow Bird, former president of Fort Berthold tribal college.
UND still plans to do a second round of the poster campaign with portraits of American Indian UND grads, Boyd said, but that group will not include the tribal college administrators.
"The nickname is a complicating factor for many of our Native American students and graduates," Boyd said. "And while they don't agree universally on the issue, it's clear that it remains divisive."

Young Tired Native wrote on Aug 9, 2008 10:01 PM:
Where are we headed? wrote on Mar 22, 2008 9:24 AM:
From Dumber wrote on Mar 22, 2008 8:27 AM:
Heres an Idea wrote on Mar 21, 2008 3:18 PM:
To Dumb From Dumber wrote on Mar 21, 2008 3:17 PM:
You can sue anyone for any reason you like but it doesn't mean you'll be successful. I don't believe UND has not done anything wrong in the eyes of local, state, or federal law makers. This is about the NCAA having the right to penalize one of its members for choosing a name that they claimed was abusive and hostile. Interestingly enough, I believe the NCAA has also had a very difficult time identifying what UND has done that is abusive and hostile. As a result the NCAA has changed their position by saying the name could lead to an abusive and hostile environment. So the settlement
is to allow a couple North Dakato Native American tribes to decide whether
UND may use the name and logo. I don't believe these tribes have to show
that the use of "Fighting Sioux" is abusive or hostile but rather just decide for whatever reasons they want.
I sure don't blame Native Americans for the current situation. I suspect some are truly offended, some don't care, and many others are proud of UND's use. I wish the true statistics were known so a good decision by the tribes could be made. I believe the NCAA has gone into an area where it has no business and as a result has created the current turmoil.
"
Deb wrote on Mar 21, 2008 2:04 PM:
Deb wrote on Mar 21, 2008 2:03 PM:
yes, the Cleveland Indians and the Washington Redskins should change their nicknames as well.
If you are threatened or feel subjugated by the Fighting Irish nickname and mascot, then form a group of like-minded people and try to get it changed. "
Rainbowstar wrote on Mar 21, 2008 1:57 PM:
Dumb North Dakotan wrote on Mar 21, 2008 11:51 AM:
hugo wrote on Mar 21, 2008 10:09 AM:
Tom wrote on Mar 21, 2008 8:49 AM:
Sick of it all wrote on Mar 20, 2008 11:31 PM:
to sioux forever wrote on Mar 20, 2008 9:11 PM:
thinking wrote on Mar 20, 2008 8:48 PM:
Nodak wrote on Mar 20, 2008 5:34 PM:
Sioux Forever wrote on Mar 20, 2008 4:56 PM:
what the!!! wrote on Mar 20, 2008 4:16 PM:
Authentic Sioux wrote on Mar 20, 2008 1:03 PM:
Tom wrote on Mar 20, 2008 12:05 PM:
To To Deb wrote on Mar 20, 2008 9:19 AM:
To To Deb wrote on Mar 20, 2008 9:12 AM:
Wicked Rezer wrote on Mar 20, 2008 8:14 AM:
Sioux Forever wrote on Mar 20, 2008 8:04 AM:
To Deb, wrote on Mar 18, 2008 10:50 AM:
The so called "tribal leaders" ignore real issues that the tribes face to run around the state to photo ops opposing the name. Let's all roll up our sleeves and deal with the issues that our fellow residents have, but let's not get side-tracked by single agenda folks.
"
Idea!! wrote on Mar 18, 2008 2:24 AM:
time wrote on Mar 17, 2008 6:43 PM:
Maybe their real issue now is, they want the Indian students to attend Indian colleges rather than UND! "
To mischief wrote on Mar 15, 2008 2:28 PM:
Sioux is a part of North Dakota State History which we all share and I believe most of us are proud of. I'm sorry to read that you don't believe Sioux heritage is worthy of our pride. But each to their own. "
mischief wrote on Mar 15, 2008 3:46 AM:
Le meya! wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:50 PM:
Don't take this out on all Indians. It's just some wannabees. "
To To Deb wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:40 PM:
proudtobenative wrote on Mar 14, 2008 5:40 PM:
MD in ND wrote on Mar 14, 2008 5:26 PM:
lala wrote on Mar 14, 2008 5:08 PM:
To Fred wrote on Mar 14, 2008 4:14 PM:
JB wrote on Mar 14, 2008 4:06 PM:
to Jb wrote on Mar 14, 2008 3:06 PM:
To Deb, wrote on Mar 14, 2008 2:51 PM:
JB wrote on Mar 14, 2008 1:24 PM:
Furthermore, an acedote about a different sports team having the nickname "Satans" is not relevant to this discussion.
Finally, if you want to start in on how the affected tribes should have a vote, remember, they are Sovereign, meaning they can do as they wish. If they want a referendum, fine, but if they dont, there is nothing non-members can do about it. "
Getting Old wrote on Mar 14, 2008 11:49 AM:
Fred wrote on Mar 14, 2008 11:34 AM:
NDr aka now confused wrote on Mar 14, 2008 11:33 AM:
JB wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:18 AM:
SE Forty wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:53 AM:
Deb wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:47 AM:
I wonder wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:31 AM:
NDr wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:19 AM:
perhaps wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:14 AM:
n8vguy wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:43 AM:
nodakman wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:02 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.