Feb 17, 2008 - 04:05:40 CST
When will it end? Not until someone takes control of a sticky state situation that seems to get uglier and uglier by the day.That someone is the Workforce Safety and Insurance Board of Directors. And if they won't do something, then the members should resign in toto for doing nothing.
It must be declared loudly once again that the majority of employees at WSI are valuable and professional people. But the agency continues to fester because of the actions of a few, some who have agendas and loyalties that aren't based upon injured workers or employees. They should be banished.
It is foolish and a waste of time and money for the board to wait for study after study, analysis and review ad hominem and ad nauseam. Could anyone who has followed the months-long soap opera not believe that serious action - including administrative restructuring - needs to take place now?
There is enough blame to go around, but this is not a blame game. Sometimes it is best to start over, and the management culture and structure at WSI must be changed. The agency directors are the only ones who can do it.
The North Dakota Century Code is clear: "The board shall appoint the director of the organization. The director is subject to the supervision and direction of the board and serves at the pleasure of the board."
This is where Gov. John Hoeven also is involved. More from the Century Code: "The governor shall make the necessary appointments to ensure the term of office of members (of the board) ... ."
While there doesn't seem to be a mechanism for the governor to fire members of the board, he needs to strongly encourage them (or continue to do so) to take action that will stop the juvenile nonsense at WSI. If they don't listen, he should ask them to resign (even demand it). After all, who would want to continue in such an appointment without the governor's support? If the governor doesn't use all the leverage he has to resolve the issues, then his selection of appointments could be viewed as mistakes in judgment, something he doesn't need in this mean (political) season.
More Century Code: "(The board should) assist the organization in formulating policies and discussing problems related to the administration of the organization, while ensuring impartiality and freedom from political influence ... (It should) incorporate principles of continuous improvement goal-setting, a procedure for implementing a team-oriented continuous improvement program throughout all operations of the organization. The program must include a number of challenging, measurable goals to ensure the organization maintains focus on improving those areas most important to its primary mission."
The remaining administrative parts at WSI might not be broken, but they are showing signs of stress. But the real problem is that they don't fit together anymore. Much has been done over the past several months to try to put the puzzle back together, but there's one large missing piece.
A new director - now - is needed. Only then can the healing process begin. Appropriate procedures to appoint a director should be followed. A new interim director needs to be appointed for the duration of time necessary to hire a permanent head woman or man. Someone without WSI ties, someone with impressive administrative abilities, someone who might be available for a few months (possibly a well-respected retiree).
The next director needs to be a high-profile, respected and no-nonsense administrator. We have the talent; we just need to recruit it. Several names come to mind, or folks like these:
How about Dave Sprynczynatyk, adjutant general and former head of the North Dakota Department of Transportation?
Or Eric Hardmeyer, president of the Bank of North Dakota?
Maybe Heidi Heitkamp, former candidate for governor, former attorney general and former state tax commissioner?
Or Sandi Tabor, general counsel for the Lignite Energy Council, Bismarck city commissioner and former chief of staff for AG Wayne Stenehjem?
Here's the bottom line. The WSI Board of Directors needs to stop fiddling around while WSI continues to burn to the ground.


Michael Gaarder wrote on Feb 16, 2009 5:41 PM:
I say get off your high horses stop claiming back and forth that you do not want WSI to be a political tug of war, and get your acts together. WSI is already politically influenced in the fact of premium refunds, and Safety Grants being handed back to many lawmakers who own businesses. To anyone not catching this Here is your sign, they are influenced by the cash they get handed back by WSI to vote in WSIs favor on laws. A.K.A. Michael Holmes "
Thomas Elliot wrote on Feb 23, 2008 3:09 PM:
In To Deep wrote on Feb 22, 2008 1:26 AM:
AND ANOTHER THING wrote on Feb 21, 2008 9:33 AM:
"
Dopey/Sleep/Grumpy wrote on Feb 19, 2008 6:19 PM:
ho hum. "
Economic Conservative wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:42 AM:
Bismarck Voter wrote on Feb 18, 2008 4:57 PM:
Chuck wrote on Feb 18, 2008 10:15 AM:
MAX FACTS wrote on Feb 17, 2008 11:12 PM:
IQ wrote on Feb 17, 2008 11:05 PM:
MIKE wrote on Feb 17, 2008 10:20 PM:
Heritage wrote on Feb 17, 2008 8:43 PM:
"
Kimberly wrote on Feb 17, 2008 6:01 PM:
To Enough from you already wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:11 PM:
As for lies, and truths, would it not be fair to let everything come out even if they are lies, or truths, and let a real independent agency hash out the truth to it all? Maybe you could share your “REAL FACTS of WSI” since we as the public obviously are missing it, enlighten us on your “FACTS” if you have them to prove the issues being brought up by so many are not true. Maybe, just maybe you should get on a TV news channel and clear up all these issues, and discredit all these numerous claims everyone makes against WSI. I am sure you could do this, and then all this would go away….RIGHT? I just have one question did you apply for grant money, and receive it to post a defense for WSI?
"
tony wrote on Feb 17, 2008 12:12 PM:
Enough from you Already wrote on Feb 17, 2008 11:22 AM:
Maybe if everyone just stopped acting like they knew what they were talking about and actually looked at the REAL FACTS of WSI they could see the real picture. In spite of all the public pronouncements, the workforce there (including its management) is getting the job done. Leave them along, get out of their faces, get out of their way and let them do their jobs. Thankfully the Board is the only group taking a deep breath and leading with calm. Now that said, Long should be fired tomorrow. He knows not of what he speaks and is a drama queen who can not tell the truth and frankily is so now twisted that I am not sure he really knows what the truth is anymore.
"
Latin wrote on Feb 17, 2008 10:42 AM:
Why now wrote on Feb 17, 2008 10:14 AM:
The whole process absolutely must be intentionally transparent to all stakeholders, the general public and the groups with special interest in seeing a healthy WSI.
The transparency is crucial in what happens to those WSI people who've sought whistleblower protection. One is on paid leave, the other has been terminated - that is, as it stands now. WSI management and the board must be prepared to reveal as much as actually pertains to job performance about the status of their employment, and if someone is fired, justify why that person should not be working for the agency. If they can't justify a termination, then the whistleblowers must be put to work."
I believe this is what WSI is doing...so why has the Editorial Board written these words today? And demanded this approach? Please explain.
"
It's Time wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:11 AM:
Brilliant wrote on Feb 17, 2008 6:54 AM:
But he won't...way too political for him and too risky and we all know Hoeven won't take any risks. Too bad. A Winning combination for the state. "
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.