Jan 27, 2008 - 04:05:27 CST
My Kansas friend Quentin visited last week. He's a highly regarded management consultant. He spends his time reorganizing institutions. He loves the Great Plains. He spends as much time thinking about the future of the Great Plains as anyone I know. He asked me to take him out into the heart of North Dakota.Instead of heading - predictably - to the buttes and the Badlands, we spent the whole day wandering through the energy crescent: Washburn, Garrison Dam, Stanton, Hazen, Beulah, Golden Valley. We talked endlessly about what it takes to power up America's way of life.
As far as I'm concerned, it's this simple. If we are going to be the most prosperous people who ever walked on Earth, the most obsessive consumers, and the grossest wasters of food, energy, and other extractables, and increasingly obese to boot, we're going to have to ravage the garden of Eden. We're going to have to threaten or actually fight resource wars on all continents, with a particular emphasis on the Middle East. All that to secure our way of life. And now China, with four times our population, wants to gormandize just as much as we do in America.
We get uptight when people like Al Gore tell us that our lifestyle is damaging the planet in a potentially catastrophic way. Imagine how disturbing it would be if we all honestly tried to imagine what changes would be required to fashion a benignly sustainable lifestyle that could be equally shared by all 7 billion people.
Why that's positively un-American.
I like my Diet Coke in the disposable plastic bottle, my heated garage and my SUV. So Socratic logic tells me that I have to be OK with strip mining, hectic oil development (including, alas, in the North Dakota Badlands), coal and gas plants, probably even nuclear power. When I fill my SUV I am actually voting - whether I like to admit it or not - for oil development in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge and for some version of our Middle East policies, which are much more nonpartisan than we sometimes pretend. It hardly matters what happens to my hanging chad in November. Whichever party is in power has to deliver my consumables. Period.
We need more coal-fired power plants. Some of them will be sited in America's western bituminous and lignite coal region, including North Dakota. We need more oil refineries. Whether we really need one in North Dakota is questionable. We need more pipelines. We need hydrogen, wind, solar, and geothermal power, too, but no serious student of energy believes these "happy forms of power" will more than nick the coal and oil (the gross carbon) paradigm any time soon.
The Great Plains Synfuels Plant, a few miles north of Beulah and a few miles south of Lake Sakakawea, is the largest industrial complex in North Dakota. It transforms approximately 6 million tons of coal per year into more than 50 billion cubic feet of natural gas. This is approximately one quarter of 1 percent of America's annual natural gas consumption. So, at current levels of consumption, if there were 400 such plants -
Quentin and I sat for a long time, gazing at the gasification plant. Because it was so cold, the steam hovered over the facility like a cumulous miasma. Later we studied it on Google earth and Mapquest as minutely as a couple of al-Qaida targeters.
The gasification plant is not exactly beautiful, but it is impossible not to be in awe of it - the gigantism of it, the intricacy of its miles of shaft, tower, and valve, the sheer number of welds it must have required. It's an industrial miracle and it ought to be numbered among the industrial wonders of the world. And yet, one cannot help think, all this to manufacture natural gas? It makes you appreciate God, who does it in infinitely greater volume without a single pipe.
If you sat there, as we half-heartedly did, and worked out what percentage of America's daily total energy consumption the synfuels plant provides, you might get gloomy.
How many gasification plants can North Dakota host and still be North Dakota? At what point do we cease to be North Dakota and begin to be Gillette, Wyo., or Colstrip, Mont.?
We need to fight, always, to remain North Dakota, always. That was the great achievement of Gov. Arthur A. Link in the 1970s. In his quiet but firm and magnificent way, he insisted that we still be North Dakota "when the landscape is quiet again."
I guess I'm not against more coal power plants in North Dakota, though if Montana, Wyoming, and Alberta are more eager to have them than we are, I'd gladly yield.
I'm not against another gasification plant or two in North Dakota, if we really need them, but my sense is that here on our lovely prairie they represent a degradation and a sacrifice, while in northeastern Wyoming they amount to standard operating procedure and a giddy way of life. So why not let them gravitate to where the zeal is?
Here is my one firm suggestion. If we have to have more coal plants and gasification and liquefaction facilities, we ought to insist that they be sited in the established energy crescent - between Washburn and Williston. Call it an enterprise zone or a sacrifice zone, depending on your point of view. The corridor already exists. We're used to it. We've come to terms with it. It's geographically confined.
But to put a plant south of South Heart, in the heart of North Dakota's most remarkable and most pristine landscape, on the edge of the glorious Little Missouri River Valley, close to our most significant national and international tourist destination, at the portal of a national park, would be a form of North Dakota self destruction. It would shatter our future as a prairie sanctuary. It would degrade North Dakota as nothing previously has done.
It would be, in my opinion, insane.
(Clay Jenkinson is the Theodore Roosevelt scholar-in-residence at Dickinson State University. He lives in Bismarck. Contact Jenkinson at jeffysage@;aol.com.)

West River wrote on Feb 2, 2008 3:21 PM:
Helga wrote on Feb 2, 2008 11:05 AM:
nodakman wrote on Feb 1, 2008 11:05 PM:
87wg wrote on Jan 29, 2008 6:32 PM:
Bismarck wrote on Jan 29, 2008 2:22 PM:
Bismarck wrote on Jan 29, 2008 12:16 PM:
halatbis wrote on Jan 29, 2008 10:19 AM:
jim wrote on Jan 28, 2008 9:06 PM:
Bismarck wrote on Jan 28, 2008 4:54 PM:
Bismarck wrote on Jan 28, 2008 4:48 PM:
dlj wrote on Jan 28, 2008 2:48 PM:
Duff wrote on Jan 28, 2008 1:25 PM:
Bismarck wrote on Jan 28, 2008 11:24 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.