Jan 07, 2008 - 04:05:11 CST
Two county officials being sued over foster care referrals to the Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch are asking a federal judge to dismiss the case.The move by Ward County Social Services Director Daniel Richter and Pierce County Social Services Director Mary Hermanson comes on the heels of a similar request by Assistant Attorney General Douglas Bahr, who is representing three state officials named as defendants.
Bahr last month asked U.S. District Judge Dan Hovland to throw out the lawsuit filed by the Wisconsin-based Freedom From Religion Foundation and some North Dakota taxpayers who believe public money is being used to indoctrinate young people with religion.
The lawsuit filed in June by the nation's largest group of atheists and agnostics says referrals to the Dakota Boys and Girls Ranch, which serves troubled children, are funded by taxpayer money and that the staff at ranch facilities in Minot, Fargo and Bismarck indoctrinate children with religion.
Officials of the state and the Boys and Girls Ranch, which is affiliated with the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, dispute the claims.
Bahr, in his motion, said the Freedom From Religion Foundation can challenge only specific legislative appropriations and not government officials' use of money on constitutional grounds.
He is representing Lisa Bjergaard, director of juvenile services for the state Corrections Department; state School Superintendent Wayne Sanstead; and state Human Services Director Carol Olson.
Minot attorney Bryan Van Grinsven, who is representing Richter and Hermanson, said in his motion to dismiss that his clients should not be among the defendants. The lawsuit is aimed at state and not county programs, he wrote.
Richard Bolton, an attor- ney for the foundation, has until Jan. 23 to submit a response to Van Grinsven's motion. He was granted an extension on his deadline to reply to Bahr's motion, until Thursday.
Foundation spokesman Dan Barker has said that asking for a dismissal of the lawsuit based on legal standing is not really addressing the issue.

eddifiedtavous wrote on Jan 15, 2008 9:07 AM:
Try walking in their shoes before you say something inconsiderate. "
MamaMia wrote on Jan 14, 2008 9:08 AM:
oooops wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:41 PM:
mandan wrote on Jan 13, 2008 1:07 AM:
eddifiedtavous wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:08 PM:
To be honest, if you were having a hard time in your life and you were placed in a facility, away from your home, friends, family, your belongings and you bring something of your religion with you such as a book, or necklace, or poem and it was taken away would you not be upset? If you were told you were not allowed to speak of your religion or to state you don't believe in God without losing points, would you not feel constricted and helpless?
Troubled youth need help, understanding, and acceptance, not forced religion.
The Youth Correctional Center has a wonderful way of dealing with the religion issue. You can go to church, but if you don't, you can sit in your room during church time. They do not punish you or look down on you for your decision when it comes to religion.
Many troubled youth need help with decision making, but religion is not one of those. "
A Few Notes wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:46 AM:
Ulterior Motives wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:12 AM:
Former Missouri Synod Lutheran wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:39 AM:
Hope wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:27 AM:
Avid Reader wrote on Jan 10, 2008 6:06 PM:
Sev wrote on Jan 10, 2008 1:44 PM:
Why do you have so much hate? Lenin didn't think emotions such as hate were helpful to the cause. "
Chavez wrote on Jan 10, 2008 8:45 AM:
Far too often the well-meaning conservative Christian is so sure that he/she knows the right way to God that they cannot and will not see any other position. As a result, doesn't it simply make sense to keep religoin out of this treatment program and have the kids learn about religion from their parents or church of their choice? In any event, religion should be kept OUT of this agency IF they are receiving taxpayer funding. Then again, there is another answer: END TAXPAYER SUPPORT TO THIS AGENCY. Then they can teach whatever they want.
It is frightening just how much in danger the separation of church and state is in the United States. The moralizers, the self-righteous, and even the well-meaning surely must see that it is best to keep religious teachings apart from agencies meant to benefit the state as a whole, regardless of their religious beliefs. However, having said that, we must also be aware that the Christian Right--whether Protestant or Catholic--will not stop until, as they see it, they have "Returned the Nation to Christ." When and if that happens, we will see what it is to have a Christian Taliban here in the US. "
Front Row Seat wrote on Jan 10, 2008 7:57 AM:
Avid Reader wrote on Jan 9, 2008 4:34 PM:
To Too Late wrote on Jan 9, 2008 3:59 PM:
Lost wrote on Jan 9, 2008 2:07 PM:
Too late wrote on Jan 9, 2008 12:24 PM:
John Ford wrote on Jan 8, 2008 2:51 PM:
ndccpsfcr@yahoo.com. To you PO3 not all the plaintiffs are athiests in this suit. Some of us are of a faith that is other that the self proclaimed one true religion, Lutheran. We have rights to beleive as we wish. "
Josh wrote on Jan 8, 2008 1:51 PM:
To PO3 wrote on Jan 8, 2008 1:43 PM:
PO3 wrote on Jan 8, 2008 1:08 PM:
To eddifiedtavous wrote on Jan 8, 2008 1:05 PM:
eddifiedtavous wrote on Jan 8, 2008 12:31 PM:
I was not there for religion issues. I was there for family issues within the home and stress management. No person should be forced to participate in something they do not believe in. "
Simple Lutheran wrote on Jan 8, 2008 12:18 PM:
Say what? wrote on Jan 7, 2008 9:00 PM:
C5323 wrote on Jan 7, 2008 4:41 PM:
Avid Reader wrote on Jan 7, 2008 3:35 PM:
Rasmus wrote on Jan 7, 2008 1:59 PM:
Chavez wrote on Jan 7, 2008 12:47 PM:
Oh, and "In God We Trust" on money? It was placed on paper money only in 1957 during the Cold War years when some in the US thought it would be a good idea to have God on America's side against the "godless Communists." Prior to that, "In God we trust" appears only very sporadically over the course of American history. Same thing with "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance: it was not until 1954 (during the McCarthy witchhunts) that "under God" was placed in the pledge. Too often, those ignorant of church-state issues do not realize that America was founded as a secular nation with the intention of providing freedom of religion to all. Today, the "Christian Natin" types think that means they have the right to force their narrow-minded religion and revisionist view of history down the collective throats of America. And, when they are thwarted in their efforts, they whine about "persecution" from those dastardly secular humanists, liberals, liberal media, and other boogey-men they bray about. The true threat to freedom is from those who think they are doing God's will and are working to creat a Christian theocracy here in the United States. "
Lost wrote on Jan 7, 2008 12:35 PM:
Drop it. wrote on Jan 7, 2008 8:53 AM:
Avid Reader wrote on Jan 7, 2008 8:41 AM:
Tommy wrote on Jan 7, 2008 6:41 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.