Nov 15, 2007 - 04:04:20 CST
FARGO (AP) - A former executive director of the Fargo-Moorhead Humane Society is on probation for a year after pleading guilty to animal mistreatment.Gail Ann Widmer, 29, of Fargo, entered the plea Tuesday in East Central District Court. She headed the Fargo-Moorhead Humane Society from August 2003 to August 2004.
Under the sentence handed down by Judge Wade Webb, Widmer's guilty plea may be withdrawn and the case dismissed if she successful completes her probation.
West Fargo police said Widmer was keeping animals locked in a back bedroom of an apartment. In August, they got a report that the strong smell of urine and feces was preventing maintenance workers from fixing an air conditioning unit.
"In 14 years of law enforcement, I have never in my life smelled anything so bad as what I encountered when we opened the door," Police Officer Stacy Dawkins wrote in court documents.
"I could not even enter the residence. I was standing on the balcony actually gagging, almost throwing up," Dawkins said.
The building manager told Dawkins that during an earlier visit to the apartment, she had opened the bedroom door and a number of cats had rushed out to the bathroom for water. Dawkins' report said she saw no animals in the apartment before she had to leave on an emergency call.
The officer said she returned the next day and found a small dog in the apartment and a much larger dog locked in a kennel in the back bedroom. She said she found food in the bedroom but no water.
Dawkins said Tuesday that Widmer moved out of the apartment unit before she could be questioned. She could not be reached for comment.
The current executive director of the Humane Society, Nukhet Hendricks, said Widmer has had no connection to the organization since she left it. Hendricks said law enforcement officers check out complaints about animal mistreatment, but she said they are hampered by vague laws that do not clearly define abuse.
A group called the Animal Legal Defense Fund rates North Dakota among the worst states when it comes to animal protection laws because it lacks a felony animal cruelty provision, provisions for the forfeiture of abused animals and restrictions on the future ownership of animals by people convicted of mistreatment.

Country kid wrote on Nov 20, 2007 4:36 PM:
Rescuer wrote on Nov 19, 2007 2:21 AM:
Pets Need Better Representation! wrote on Nov 17, 2007 12:53 PM:
NoDak John wrote on Nov 17, 2007 8:59 AM:
Beesh wrote on Nov 16, 2007 9:09 AM:
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.