Secrets of the land

 
LOADING
Nov 10, 2007 - 19:55:10 CST
KILLDEER MOUNTAINS - All his life, the land he lived on gave up its secrets to him.

He gathered the secrets into a story of many chapters, mainly one of blood and death between soldiers and Sioux Indians willing to die to define who would remain and who would leave.

Alick Dvirnak, 88, has always known the family ranch on the south-facing slope of the Killdeer Mountains had a story to tell.

Each piece of the story he found, each stone arrow point, each brass button from a military harness, he saved to study and to ponder.

Over time, he gathered thousands of those pieces, secrets uncovered by the plow and laid bare by wind and water.

He put the best pieces in display cases so he could preserve them and tell their story to the many people who stopped by the family ranch to see where the 1864 Battle of the Killdeer Mountains had been fought.

Today, but for not much longer, those artifacts of history and heartbreak are in a basement in Bismarck, at the home of Alick's son, Bryan.

Bryan Dvirnak has heard the story so often, he can tell it, too, his hand roving from this piece, an unexploded cannonball from the battle, to that piece, a prize arrowhead carried into battle by Bear's Heart, a Sioux too crippled to walk, but willing to fight on his back just the same.

The Dvirnak family, Alick and his wife, Grayce, now living in Colorado, and their six children, have decided the collection needs to come out of the dim basement and into the light of public domain.

They are donating it to Dickinson State University in a10-year agreement.

The university will display it so it can be seen and understood by scholars, students and everyday people. At the end of the decade, the two parties will decide if the temporary arrangement should become permanent.

Alick Dvirnak's collection, found piece by piece, studied, treasured and examined by him for decades, has never been appraised. It will be before it's transferred to the university.

Bryan Dvirnak said when the man's children look at their father's unparalleled collection of both Sioux and military artifacts, they don't see money anyway.

"I see my dad," he said. "He's one of my heroes."

The battle

Alick Dvirnak in his day was not just any rancher, nor is the ranch just any old ranch.

Besides its sheer physical beauty - 4,000 acres of the mountains with diverse timber of towering oak and monochrome poplars, strewn boulders and spring-fed creeks that beavers have dammed into ponds - it is where a historic battle was fought and won by Gen. Alfred Sully or lost by the Sioux, depending on one's perspective, more than 143 years ago.

The battle did not decide history for the Sioux gathered on the present-day Dvirnak ranch a swelteringly hot July 28, 1864.

History already had been foretold; the white man, driven to expand, "civilize" the West and in this campaign, pay back the Sioux for the white deaths in Minnesota in 1862, would not stand down.

Four soldiers died. Two of them are buried on the Dvirnak's ranch on a small plot donated to the North Dakota Historical Society. When Alick Dvirnak was a school boy, kids at the country school each brought a quarter to pay for their grave markers.

No one knows the exact Sioux casualty count, but it was at least 100 dead, perhaps as many as 300.

Battle accounts estimate as many as 6,000 Sioux were encamped there with the mountains providing cover, game and water, certain their numbers presaged victory.

Sully's advance from a base camp near Richardton was a mile square formation - four sides of sweating, armed foot soldiers, mounted shooters and cannons at the corners and mid posts.

It was lethal.

The Sioux fled north, through the mountains and out into the Badlands and the Little Missouri River country.

What they couldn't carry, they stashed in the timber - food, tools, clothing.

Sully ordered his troops to destroy everything in the deserted Sioux camps and set fire to the mountains.

Back at the ranch

There has been a Dvirnak at the ranch since 1928.

It was purchased by Jack Dvirnak, Alick Dvirnak's father, only the third owner after W.L. Crosby, who came from a Wisconsin lumber family, and Wilse Richards, a Texas cattle driver, who bought it from Crosby's widow in 1897.

Crosby was a law school classmate of Theodore Roosevelt and they crossed historical paths in 1886. Roosevelt, living then at the Elkhorn Ranch in Billings County, stopped at the ranch to borrow a wagon to transport to jail in Dickinson a pair of scoundrels who'd stolen his boat off the Little Missouri River.

History, like beauty in those mountains, is everywhere.

Craig Dvirnak lives at the ranch, still raising the family's distinctive cross-breed cattle marked with the second-oldest registered brand in North Dakota, the Diamond C.

He has eyes like his father's for the secrets the ranch still yields.

He has found hundreds of his own; literally almost stumbling over them, like the time he was chasing a bull out of the high pasture and all but stepped on a fairly intact copper kettle. It was one of hundreds that had been collected from the deserted camp, tossed into a ravine for garbage and later salvaged for scrap metal.

In the early days, workers at the ranch gathered up enough heavy rock Sioux hammers to fill a couple of wagons.

Craig Dvirnak's kids were in the barnyard recently and found a nice spear point, metal trade knife and a thumb scraper.

Craig Dvirnak knows the family's patch of the mountains like the back of his own hand. He knows the likely ways the Sioux fled north through the trees that were burned behind them and has found traces left from where the soldiers piled Sioux goods for burning.

He knows where all the springs are, where the tepee rings push out through the thick grass. He knows where the battle was pitched and he knows where Bear's Heart lay and where his dad, after looking for years, finally found Bear's Heart's arrow.

Like his dad, he likes talking with the people who come to the ranch, looking for the battlefield and the graves of the two dead soldiers. The kitchen table from which 200-year-old burr oaks can be seen out the window is a customary place to start the fascinating conversation.

People are always welcome to hike, so long as they check in with the family and use common sense with fence gates and matches.

Craig Dvirnak said his father long expressed hope that his own collection wouldn't be split up and that it would be shared with the public.

Donating it to Dickinson State University accomplishes both those goals.

Someday, Craig Dvirnak expects his own collection will join his father's.

He isn't ready yet, because he isn't done looking. He knows that as many secrets as the ranch and the Killdeer Mountains have already yielded, there are still an untold number waiting to be discovered.

"I told my dad, 'Wherever yours ends up, mine will too. Someday, somewhere, they'll be together,' " Craig Dvirnak said.

(Reach reporter Lauren Donovan at 888-303-5511, or lauren@;westriv.com.)
   Printer friendly version
Secrets of the land
Comments

Carole Gilpin wrote on Jan 1, 2008 6:45 PM:

" I am Bryan Dvirnak's cousin, and Alick Dvirnak's niece. The Diamond C Ranch is located on an incredibly beautiful, historical site. My family and I have spent many summers there hiking,exploring, and enjoying the beauty and history that the ranch provides. My uncle and cousins always had a deep and profound respect for the land, the graves, and any artifacts that were found. I happen to be employed by the Federal Government, and have seen how they "manage" anything of value. It is a great relief to me to know that such great historical treasures are in the safe keeping of people who truly care about the Sioux and all that they represented. I can remember riding up to Elk Point and being shown the pass where the Sioux escaped through. If it was up to the government, it would be paved, and barricaded with concession stands and gift shops and chem toilets. I am very grateful that the ranch and the historical battlefield are in the safekeeping of my cousin Craig. "

Bryan Dvirnak wrote on Nov 25, 2007 9:40 AM:

" I am Bryan Dvirnak, the son of Alick Dvirnak. For those critic's of this article and your blog comments, I will tell you, go and talk to the Sioux Indian Tribes in Canada, Montana and North Dakota, My Father was recognized and honored by the Tribes for his recognition and telling of their side of the story. Go talk to the Sioux Medicine Man Chief Arvol Looking Eagle from South Dakota and ask him what he thinks of the Diamond C Ranch and my Father and my Fathers dedication to telling the Sioux story. As a matter of fact, my Father "smoked their piece pipe" with the Sioux (my Dad has never smoked a day in his life) as part of a five year cerimony the Sioux Tribe had on the ranch between 1995-1999. By the way, my Family opened our ranch to the Sioux Tribe and welcomed them so they could cerimoniously bury their dead according to "custom" that never had occured as a result of the Battle of 1864. And to those critics who say we "looted the land" Let me also tell you that my Great Grand Father, Jack Dvirnak, out right gifted land to the State of North Dakota 60 plus years ago to help preserve history. The State of North Dakota errected a monument that recognized the lives that were lost, both Native American and military. My Grand Father, Father and now brother, have done more to preserve, honor and recognize more for the Native Americans and miliary sacrifices made than most will ever know. "

Pick Your Battles! wrote on Nov 21, 2007 12:18 PM:

" From the Logic being displayed here it would be assumed that the history of one single even supersedes a persons rights to control their own property, considering everything is legal of course. The Dvirnak family has not done anything illegal! Are American tax payers expected to pay to keep 4,000 + acres preserved so a few hippies can drive their hybrid cars out to see it. It is a working ranch that just so happened to have a battle field on it. We already have several historic sights in the state that tax payers support. Where do we draw the line. I would be willing to bet that the Dvirnak ranch is one of many. Do we pass a law that says, "if you find historic artifacts on your property it automatically becomes property of the state". If so, who is going to report any finding. This would be far worse than a few ranchers picking them up and having them displayed. Also, what is wrong with displaying these artifacts instead of leaving them in the ground. The US has thousands of museums, are they wrong because they have removed these artifacts to display them. One important thing that you have wrong, "Storytelling" is history, in a lot of history we are forced to fill in the blanks because there is no possible way to go back in time. As for the one sided view of the battle, I agree both sides deserve to have there own "storytelling". "

Private ownership of history? wrote on Nov 20, 2007 9:58 AM:

" The Dvirnak's do not own the history of the Battle of the Killdeer Mountains. They were lucky enough to come into a piece of property that became privatized before our nation's preservation laws went into effect and the importance of this site was known . Private property ownership does not negate a citizen's obligation to protect the public trust. A private landowner can also pollute his land, misuse his animals, and squander his health, because he owns them, but should he? At what point does society step in? Not all citizens are motivated by oil, gold, and the highest bidder. Most people do the right thing. I disagree with you; I think most people in this country if they had a very important historic site would care for it and seek out ways to protect its integrity for their children and grandchildren and the future. Most people love our history. That is why heritage tourism is so big, and why we still have sites to go to like Mesa Verde and Mount Vernon and Monticello, and the Medicine Wheel. If it matters, I have looked into the situation, and I have been to the site, several times. It brings me to the conclusion that what they are doing is not "preserving" the site. They are picking up pieces of it and carting them away. But it sounds like our definitions of "to preserve?" and of history are different. To me, history should be authentic and fact based and multi perspective, it should include more than one family's perspective. As for Lauren Donovan's journalistic skills, contrast this article to the researched article Sara Kincaid wrote this last weekend about Sitting Bull's legacy. Donovan's is merely a well written, romanticized , single source story. It doesn't do the topic justice. I'd love to see her try again. "

Preservation!!!!! wrote on Nov 19, 2007 9:59 AM:

" To "Preservation or Looting"- You should thank them for making an attempt to preserve this site at all. It is their property. They allow people to drive up to their house and view the monument. They could cut off access to any of it if they wanted to. You forget that they are already doing more to preserve the history of this place than the majority of people would. You may be one of those people that would give the land over to the state for historic purposes but 99% of the people wouldn't. Plus, how can you loot your own property. If I buy a piece of property and it happens to have oil under it or gold or whatever, it makes that mine. Say all you want about it being public, but it isn't public. The people that find dinosaur bones make money off of selling them to the highest bidder. So if they want to collect the artifacts, display them, or sell them, they should be able to do just that. You really shouldn't judge them until you look into the whole situation and see just how well they really have taken care of the land. Go out and see it for yourself. I also thought the article was very well written. "

Preservation or Looting? wrote on Nov 12, 2007 9:26 AM:

" The evidence on the ground that tells the story of the Battle of the Killdeer Mountains is a treasure that belongs to the people of North Dakota and this nation, no less than the battlefield sites of Bunker Hill, Gettysburg or the Little Bighorn. When relic hunters pick up (or worse, dig up) artifacts they destroy sites. The arrowheads and cannonballs become stuff in a box in a basement or barn. When collections are donated to institutions, no one can guarantee their authenticity. Mr. Dvirnak says these items came from the area, but how can he prove it? Bear’s Heart’s arrow? Does he simply feel it? What the Mr. Dvirnaks "feel" isn’t history or science, it’s storytelling. The provenience or exact locations are lost forever. Real documentation should be done where the Sioux camped, fled, fought, died, and were buried, before the integrity of the place is lost, piece by piece. The Dvirnaks have picked up thousands of pieces of evidence, admit they aren’t finished yet, and invite others to do the same. Our state’s irreplaceable historic sites should not “yield” their secrets to private relic hunters. If this site were on public land, it would be protected, and their collecting would be punishable by law. Lauren Donovan forgot basic journalism principles: objectivity, neutrality, and taking into account competing views. Single source stories are lazy. What do Sioux historians think about the site today? What do state historic preservation people think? How are we to understand preservation here compared to what happens at other battlefield sites in America? Should US law allow private landowners to own cultural resources when few other nations do? Romanticizing and encouraging the destruction of our history is unethical. This piece of the past is not just Dvirnak heritage, afterall, it belongs to us all, and to the future, too. "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY