Ethanol byproduct aiding North Dakota ranchers

 
LOADING
Aug 27, 2007 - 04:05:02 CDT
North Dakota's booming ethanol industry is providing feed that cattle find tasty and ranchers find affordable - so far.

"The byproduct was a pretty good buy last year, but I'm not sure where they're going to price it this year," said Shawn Arndorfer, who owns a cattle feedlot near Hettinger and manages a second one near Scranton. "There's enough demand for the byproduct that I think it will probably push prices up a little bit."

The byproduct of corn ethanol production - called distillers grains - can replace some of the grain corn and protein supplements in a cow's diet. "Typically it's cheaper than the same amount of corn (and) soybean meal, whatever protein source you're using," said Greg Lardy, a beef cattle specialist with the North Dakota State University Extension Service.

"In Nebraska, South Dakota and Iowa, where they've got huge amounts of byproduct being produced, (cattle) numbers are really going up," he said.

Duane Zent, who farms in the Richardton area, said he has had good luck with distillers grains from the Red Trail Energy plant, which produces ethanol in southwestern North Dakota.

"It's cheaper than buying corn, (and) cows really like it," he said.

Whether cattle numbers will increase in North Dakota as a result remains to be seen.

With four ethanol plants on line in North Dakota and at least three more being built, the Extension Service and North Dakota Agricultural Statistics Service plan a survey this winter to find out how many cattle on feed are in the state. The last survey was done in 2005, before ethanol plants at Richardton and Underwood began operating, Lardy said.

"The sense we got just talking to the ethanol plants is there's a lot of interest in the feed products coming out of Richardton and Underwood," he said.

Keith Finney, the commodities manager for Red Trail Energy LLC, said the Richardton plant is producing about 170,000 tons of distillers grains annually. About half is being sold locally, while the rest is shipped to the West Coast and Canada.

"It's a huge demand, and the demand is growing as people learn how to use it," Finney said. "We'll have more demand than we have supply once everyone learns how to use it."

Garry Ottmar, a livestock research specialist at the Dickinson Research Extension Center, said officials there are seeking grant money to research distillers grains and sugar beet pulp, a byproduct of a sugar processing plant in Montana.

"It's going to get pretty costly to feed some of the cattle (in the region) if that corn price keeps going up," Ottmar said, referring to high corn prices caused by the demand from the ethanol industry. "(Ranchers) are looking for alternatives, and calling us and wondering about these byproducts. They're looking for how much can they feed, what's the cost per day, is it worth messing with or not."

Lardy said that, 1½ years from now, "We'll have almost 10 times the (ethanol) capacity that we had two years ago" in North Dakota along with an equal increase in distillers grains. He expects more feedlots and individual ranchers to use the byproduct if it remains economical.

"It's not going to be a total replacement for corn, but it is a major benefit from ethanol production, having access to that byproduct," he said.
   Printer friendly version
Ethanol byproduct aiding North Dakota ranchers
Comments

to J2 wrote on Sep 8, 2007 8:34 AM:

" I'd love to go pick it up IF I COULD AFFORD THE GAS TO DRIVE 200 MILES TO PICK IT UP AND BRING IT BACK TO MY FARM. There's no benefit here either for lowering gas prices or providing ND farmers/ranchers with affordable feed. "

Fossilman wrote on Aug 31, 2007 4:03 PM:

" Ethanol isn't money worthy,it costs more to make it than it does to buy it............ "

J2 wrote on Aug 28, 2007 12:34 PM:

" The byproduct can be picked up at a ethanol plant by calling and making arrangements. You need to have the transportation though.You can't expect the ethanol plant to deliver this to your doorstep can you? It is also getting shipped out by rail to use in other products besides cattle feed. "

Where is this by-product wrote on Aug 28, 2007 10:10 AM:

" In my area, we don't have any of this wonderful by-product available. Why are we shipping out of state when we need the feed here. At the price of corn I can't afford to feed my cattle feed in the winter. The by-product would be nice but we can't get it here. Why not? "

J2 wrote on Aug 28, 2007 9:22 AM:

" To Mike-At least we are using some byproducts of ethanol to help reduce feed strain on the cattle industry in certain parts. Its just like anything else in industry it will not benefit every single person in the US. And to GDP there is very strict air compliance testing that goes on at ethanol plants. Why would the ethanol industry just be allowed to pollute the air? That does not make alot of sense. "

J2 wrote on Aug 28, 2007 8:20 AM:

" Are you all oil lobbyists? Get a clue and research more before you bad mouth the ethanol industry. "

M- wrote on Aug 28, 2007 8:04 AM:

" More of our food being "poisoned." We just don't know the results of this test yet. "

WHATEVER wrote on Aug 28, 2007 4:51 AM:

" i don't understand it. The US can build these ethonal plants but they can't build more oil refineries. It doesn't ad up. My understanding it takes 1 gallon of oil to produce just a little over a gallon of ethanol. Correct me if I am wrong! "

Mike wrote on Aug 27, 2007 4:32 PM:

" This byproduct may be good for those who feed cattle for slaughter but this byproduct cannot be feed to pregnant cattle and is far to costly to ship to other parts of the state. If you live in the middle of the state and must use some sort of corn based feed it is still cheaper to feed corn without all the hassles of this byproduct. "

the GDP wrote on Aug 27, 2007 2:50 PM:

" Coal burning Ethanol plants as at Richardton impact air quality, mercury levels in lake fish and acid rain. The gross national product goes up not just from fatter cattle, but from asthma, mercury poisoning and global warming related climate destabilization impacts.(more flooding etc) They have wind in the Richardton area, why not use windmills to generate substantial energy for the plant and reduce coal burning. Are they scrubbing the smoke adequately or do they come under a different rule. "

Concerned in Mandan wrote on Aug 27, 2007 11:38 AM:

" Hopefully the Department of Health and other agencies will monitor the impact of the "end" end product as well. Manure composition changes with use of distillers' grain. I don't want our water quality to be impacted by higher "nutrient" (phosphorus and potassium)" load on our fields. There's a story idea for the Tribune..... "

Ted wrote on Aug 27, 2007 6:00 AM:

" The title of the article states that ethanol byproducts helps ranchers, when in fact it helps cattle feeders. Cow/calf producers are considered true ranchers. The New World Dictionary of American English defines a ranch as "a large farm.......for the raising of cattle.......in great numbers." Cattle feeders do just that, they "feed" cattle to slaughter weight. Ranchers, on the other hand, "raise" cattle. Again, the dictionary defines "raise" as "....to breed" cattle. "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY