Adjusting to new smoking law

 
LOADING
Jul 24, 2005 - 23:28:42 CDT
Two Williston bingo operations expect to lose most of their customers. In Wahpeton, a factory's employees will take their cigarettes onto outdoor patios. Across North Dakota, restaurant-bar businesses will be going smoke-free, rather than pay for the remodeling needed to allow continued puffing.

A week from Monday, a new law imposing statewide restrictions on indoor smoking take effect. Someone who lights up indoors in public buildings, or inside most businesses, may be fined $500. A proprietor who allows illegal smoking could be fined $100 or more.

The law allows smoking in bars, but it is no longer permitted in other locations where smoking has long been common, such as bowling alleys and bingo halls. Public health officials say the change will provide a fresh impetus for smokers to drop the habit.

"I think this is a really good thing for the general health of North Dakota," said Nancy Thoen, the tobacco prevention coordinator for Central Valley Health, an agency that covers Stutsman and Logan counties.

"For people who have been wanting to quit, this is a great opportunity for them," Thoen said. "They're going to have to cut back, because they can't smoke at work."

Colleen Larson, the tobacco prevention coordinator in Richland County's health department, said many establishments are going smoke-free, instead of trying to make arrangements -- such as enclosing the bar area in a restaurant -- that would allow smoking to continue.

"A lot of owners are relieved that the law will take away their decision," she said. "But other places know that won't work for them."

Roseanne Marquez, who is the gaming manager for the Williston State College Foundation and the Williston Basin Skating Club, said the law will halt smoking in Williston's events center, where the two organizations host bingo games for one day a week each.

Bingo draws 85 to 100 people on each of the two days, and about three-quarters of the customers smoke, Marquez estimates.

"They just said they wouldn't come," she said. "It's basically going to end up hurting our charities, and shutting our bingo down."

Bowlers on the six lanes at the Tommy Turtle Lanes and Restaurant in Bottineau will no longer be able to smoke while they bowl, said the business' owner, Tom Kessler. The restaurant's smoking section will have to be discontinued.

Kessler believes it is wrong for the state to regulate smoking within a private business. Opponents of the smoking law made similar arguments during the North Dakota Legislature this year, but they did not prevail.

Customers who don't like smoking are not compelled to come into his business, Kessler said.

"I thought we lived in a free society," Kessler said. "I don't force anybody to come in and do business with me. If cigarettes are so bad, why doesn't the government just stop having people farm and make the darn things?"

In Wahpeton's Imation plant, employees who now visit enclosed, separately ventilated rooms for a puff will have to go to an outdoor patio, said Marilee Tischer, the plant's human resource manager.

The company, which makes data storage diskettes and tapes, will also be offering quit-smoking classes and materials through Richland County's health department and its own insurer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. The company has about 600 workers; Tischer said she is unsure how many of them use tobacco.

Imation has been circulating information about the law, and the company's compliance plans, for weeks, Tischer said. There has even been talk about refurbishing the smoking rooms within the plant's three buildings, and installing fitness equipment.

"Most of our employees who smoke were saying, we knew it was going to happen sometime," she said. "They're kind of resigned to it."

In Minot, which has had a city ban on restaurant smoking for more than three years, and Fargo, which has barred most indoor smoking since Dec. 1, there have been relatively few questions about the law's implementation, public health officials say. In Grand Forks, an anti-smoking law which is tougher in some respects than the state legislation also takes effect Aug. 1.

Lori Brierley, tobacco prevention director at Minot's First District Health Unit, said the city's ban on restaurant smoking won quick public acceptance, and she expects the state law will get a similar welcome.

"The majority of the people in Minot are nonsmokers, and they really appreciated (Minot's) ordinance," Brierley said. "It didn't take very long before they had an expectation that, this is how it should be everywhere. For most people, I think the new state law will be like that."
   Printer friendly version
Adjusting to new smoking law
Comments

... wrote on Mar 1, 2007 12:58 PM:

" [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/trojan] trojan [/URL] trojan [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/autostrade] autostrade [/URL] autostrade [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/locazione] locazione [/URL] locazione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/metano] metano [/URL] metano [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/break] break [/URL] break [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/engine] engine [/URL] engine [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/software] software [/URL] software [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/jack] jack [/URL] jack [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/chitarra] chitarra [/URL] chitarra [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/high] high [/URL] high [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/text] text [/URL] text [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/spartito] spartito [/URL] spartito [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/shirt] shirt [/URL] shirt [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bacio] bacio [/URL] bacio [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bocca] bocca [/URL] bocca [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/infermiere] infermiere [/URL] infermiere [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/sandro] sandro [/URL] sandro [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/terreno] terreno [/URL] terreno [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/kataweb] kataweb [/URL] kataweb [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/prevenzione] prevenzione [/URL] prevenzione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/tutti] tutti [/URL] tutti [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/colore] colore [/URL] colore [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/gallerie] gallerie [/URL] gallerie [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/fallimento] fallimento [/URL] fallimento "

Scott wrote on Jan 25, 2007 11:19 AM:

" I am confused to. I also wanted to post about dying deer. Last fall I found many dead turtles out of the creeks. What is up with the posts here about alcoholism and gay marriage , I wonder what story the dead deer comments are appearing under and how they are interpreted ? "

billy wrote on Dec 27, 2006 6:30 AM:

" youyoung people please do not get hooked on alcahol its no fun watching your friends die because they cant quit I know I have been down that road "

2 much time on their hands wrote on Dec 26, 2006 9:07 AM:

" Plainclothes officers in unmarked cars watched for illegal or suspicious activity and then radioed uniformed officers in marked police cars to make stops. is that legal? seems like they have 2 much time or money on their hands "

I'm confused wrote on Aug 24, 2006 9:32 AM:

" Boy, I was going to comment on this but after I read the above comments it looks like those comments refer to a different story. Has there been a mixup in the database? please read the other comments. anyway I will comment on this particular story. I am appalled that the school and the police have not taken this case more seriously. this is how incidents like Columbine happen because a kid gets harrased so bad they eventually break. my question is if the parents think they have an idea who did it why not test those kids DNA and it would probably solve the whole story. if it isn't them then the parents would have to accept that it would be to difficult to keep the case open. It's amazing how a school system will protect the bad kids and the trouble makers because they can bring home a state title but the innocent ones are the ones that pay. how pathetic "

Todd wrote on Jun 11, 2006 10:59 PM:

" I am writing to state my opposition to the protect marriage act. I am a heterosexual however when states like Virginia can pass laws, even if the public votes to pass the law, where a consenting adult can not create a contract with another consenting adult and have it legally honored there is a severe problem with democracy! In many states a millionaire can will to his/her cat or to any organization such as the KKK or other known discriminating, hateful organizations. So taking the bible out of this issue, it's simply a civil rights act. I don't have to say 'allow marriage' but I do not believe any bill should be passed that is basically based on 'sin' in the bible and takes away consenting adults to create contracts regarding financial, legal, or other contracts that effect every day life. Are we going back to Nazi Germany? If we are going to basically use the bible on this law, then it's only fair that we use all the 'statements' in the bible such as adultery, gambling, ect. Should someone who commits adultery have their contracts honored for the rest of their lives? Why are we being selective towards one group? Its bottom line is its illegal regardless of if the people of a state to pass the law. Why should a rapist, a child molester, or a convicted murder be able to create a legal contract and have it honored? The protect marriage act is based on hate. You may not agree with it or choose to have recognized but you have NO right to stop a consenting, law abiding legal tax payer from creating contracts and having them honored the same as any other individual. But yet two of the same sex people are told no contract they have is valid? What is the next step to throw them out of the country or to execute them? Your job is to support living rights, not pick and choose who can or can not have a piece of legal paper honored. Regards, Todd "

bree wrote on May 20, 2006 8:54 AM:

" she should automatically lose her license, at least one year. could that little girl be replaced for $70. "

Mandi wrote on May 11, 2006 8:17 AM:

" How can you let these people back out on the streets? Give me a break 4 years with 4 seperate cases. Rehabilitation is not an option with this idiot.Does he not pose a threat to society? What happened with the third time charge? Oh wait that must only apply to drug offenders! How would his attorney feel if it was his son or daughter that this person molested? Think about how many innocent lives he has already destroyed. What is it going to take to get this guy off the streets for good? How many more times are we (society) going to let someone with his background into our neighborhoods before we say thats it? "

sandra wrote on Apr 24, 2006 3:50 PM:

" i think it might it must have some picture for the children "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY