More wolves are spotted in state

 
LOADING
May 12, 2005 - 23:32:59 CDT
Tom Gehringer never found mowing the lawn too exciting. But on May 5, the Greene-area businessman had an audience.

That evening, Gehringer and his wife spotted three wolves on their property, about 45 miles north of Minot.

"I didn't expect to see something like that," he said of spotting the first one. "I had a camera in my truck and I wish I would have thought to take a picture. But it was gone so fast, took off running as soon as I turned the mower on."

Gehringer said one large black animal watched him from about 100 yards away, while another two wolves remained behind a tree row.

Gehringer's run-in marked the state's most recent gray wolf sighting, said Jeff Towner, field supervisor for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's North Dakota field office in Bismarck.

Towner said the state rarely sees gray wolves, which also can be black, white or tan in color. Many of the animals disperse from packs in Minnesota or Manitoba, and pass through the state while looking for permanent habitats, he said.

Because of a largely agricultural landscape, North Dakota could never likely support a permanent wolf population, said Rich Grosz, a Fish and Wildlife Service special agent.

This year, the Fish and Wildlife Service reported sightings around the Carter Dam area north of Greene, near Carpio and near the Canadian border north of Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge.

In early February, two wolves were seen near the northern edge of Des Lacs National Wildlife Refuge.

Although wolves sometimes move close enough to be spotted by humans, the animals pose little danger, Towner said. North America has no documented cases of wolf attacks on humans, he said, and attackson farm animals also are infrequent.

"They are curious animals, but they always try to avoid human beings if they can," Towner said. "They are very wary of humans and know humans are dangerous to them."

The federal Endangered Species Act protects gray wolves, and anyone found guilty of shooting the animals could be fined $100,000 and serve one year in jail, he said.

Since August 1998, Grosz said, wildlife officials have handled five cases of wolf killings.

Often, he said, hunters mistake the animals for large coyotes.

"People don't go out and knowingly hunt wolves," Grosz said. "But hunters need to be more conscious of what they're shooting at."

And as wolf populations in neighboring states continue to flourish, Towner said North Dakota could see more wolf sightings in the future. As top predators of wild mammals, wolves could help control the state's generous deer population, Towner said.

"If we see wolves returning to the state, it's an indication of a healthy ecosystem," he said. "I hope people keep an open mind of having such a magnificent predator in the state."
   Printer friendly version
More wolves are spotted in state
Comments

... wrote on Mar 1, 2007 12:58 PM:

" [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/trojan] trojan [/URL] trojan [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/autostrade] autostrade [/URL] autostrade [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/locazione] locazione [/URL] locazione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/metano] metano [/URL] metano [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/break] break [/URL] break [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/engine] engine [/URL] engine [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/software] software [/URL] software [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/jack] jack [/URL] jack [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/chitarra] chitarra [/URL] chitarra [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/high] high [/URL] high [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/text] text [/URL] text [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/spartito] spartito [/URL] spartito [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/shirt] shirt [/URL] shirt [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bacio] bacio [/URL] bacio [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bocca] bocca [/URL] bocca [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/infermiere] infermiere [/URL] infermiere [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/sandro] sandro [/URL] sandro [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/terreno] terreno [/URL] terreno [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/kataweb] kataweb [/URL] kataweb [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/prevenzione] prevenzione [/URL] prevenzione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/tutti] tutti [/URL] tutti [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/colore] colore [/URL] colore [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/gallerie] gallerie [/URL] gallerie [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/fallimento] fallimento [/URL] fallimento "

Scott wrote on Jan 25, 2007 11:19 AM:

" I am confused to. I also wanted to post about dying deer. Last fall I found many dead turtles out of the creeks. What is up with the posts here about alcoholism and gay marriage , I wonder what story the dead deer comments are appearing under and how they are interpreted ? "

billy wrote on Dec 27, 2006 6:30 AM:

" youyoung people please do not get hooked on alcahol its no fun watching your friends die because they cant quit I know I have been down that road "

2 much time on their hands wrote on Dec 26, 2006 9:07 AM:

" Plainclothes officers in unmarked cars watched for illegal or suspicious activity and then radioed uniformed officers in marked police cars to make stops. is that legal? seems like they have 2 much time or money on their hands "

I'm confused wrote on Aug 24, 2006 9:32 AM:

" Boy, I was going to comment on this but after I read the above comments it looks like those comments refer to a different story. Has there been a mixup in the database? please read the other comments. anyway I will comment on this particular story. I am appalled that the school and the police have not taken this case more seriously. this is how incidents like Columbine happen because a kid gets harrased so bad they eventually break. my question is if the parents think they have an idea who did it why not test those kids DNA and it would probably solve the whole story. if it isn't them then the parents would have to accept that it would be to difficult to keep the case open. It's amazing how a school system will protect the bad kids and the trouble makers because they can bring home a state title but the innocent ones are the ones that pay. how pathetic "

Todd wrote on Jun 11, 2006 10:59 PM:

" I am writing to state my opposition to the protect marriage act. I am a heterosexual however when states like Virginia can pass laws, even if the public votes to pass the law, where a consenting adult can not create a contract with another consenting adult and have it legally honored there is a severe problem with democracy! In many states a millionaire can will to his/her cat or to any organization such as the KKK or other known discriminating, hateful organizations. So taking the bible out of this issue, it's simply a civil rights act. I don't have to say 'allow marriage' but I do not believe any bill should be passed that is basically based on 'sin' in the bible and takes away consenting adults to create contracts regarding financial, legal, or other contracts that effect every day life. Are we going back to Nazi Germany? If we are going to basically use the bible on this law, then it's only fair that we use all the 'statements' in the bible such as adultery, gambling, ect. Should someone who commits adultery have their contracts honored for the rest of their lives? Why are we being selective towards one group? Its bottom line is its illegal regardless of if the people of a state to pass the law. Why should a rapist, a child molester, or a convicted murder be able to create a legal contract and have it honored? The protect marriage act is based on hate. You may not agree with it or choose to have recognized but you have NO right to stop a consenting, law abiding legal tax payer from creating contracts and having them honored the same as any other individual. But yet two of the same sex people are told no contract they have is valid? What is the next step to throw them out of the country or to execute them? Your job is to support living rights, not pick and choose who can or can not have a piece of legal paper honored. Regards, Todd "

bree wrote on May 20, 2006 8:54 AM:

" she should automatically lose her license, at least one year. could that little girl be replaced for $70. "

Mandi wrote on May 11, 2006 8:17 AM:

" How can you let these people back out on the streets? Give me a break 4 years with 4 seperate cases. Rehabilitation is not an option with this idiot.Does he not pose a threat to society? What happened with the third time charge? Oh wait that must only apply to drug offenders! How would his attorney feel if it was his son or daughter that this person molested? Think about how many innocent lives he has already destroyed. What is it going to take to get this guy off the streets for good? How many more times are we (society) going to let someone with his background into our neighborhoods before we say thats it? "

sandra wrote on Apr 24, 2006 3:50 PM:

" i think it might it must have some picture for the children "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY