Funds approved for new Bank of N.D.

 
LOADING
Apr 01, 2005 - 23:16:22 CST
The House approved a bill Friday with $11 million for a new building for the Bank of North Dakota.

The bank has very few windows, contains asbestos, mold, lead paint and does not meet fire codes, supporters say.

Rep. Blair Thoreson, R-Fargo, said the bank also has security issues.

"There is no secure place for them to do money transfers," Thoreson said.

The bill, which includes the budget for the Industrial Commission, passed 86-4. Before the final vote was taken on the bill, a separate vote was taken that, if passed, would have eliminated funding for the bank. That motion failed 19-70.

Rep. Al Carlson, R-Fargo, said he is against the process that was gone through to determine a new bank was needed because there were not enough checks and balances.

Carlson mocked the idea that the 85-year-old bank is in such poor shape that it needs replacement.

"With what we've heard, I think we better pass an immediate bill to evacuate everyone from the building because their lives are in danger," Carlson said.

Created in 1919, the Bank of North Dakota is the only state-owned bank in the nation.

The bank is currently housed in two structures -- a four-story tower built in 1917 and an annex that was built in 1967.

The tower was originally built as an automobile assembly plant, but the bank moved in two years later. The annex was a former grocery store that was purchased by the bank in 1989 and remodeled to house the student loan division.

Plans are for the bank, located at 700 E. Main Ave., to be rebuilt at its current location or constructed in another location downtown.

The bill likely will be worked on in a conference committee composed of members of each house. The Senate's version of the bill includes $18 million for a new bank.

(Reach reporter Tom Rafferty at 223-8482 or tom.rafferty@bismarcktribune.com)
   Printer friendly version
Funds approved for new Bank of N.D.
Comments

... wrote on Mar 1, 2007 12:58 PM:

" [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/trojan] trojan [/URL] trojan [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/autostrade] autostrade [/URL] autostrade [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/locazione] locazione [/URL] locazione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/metano] metano [/URL] metano [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/break] break [/URL] break [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/engine] engine [/URL] engine [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/software] software [/URL] software [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/jack] jack [/URL] jack [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/chitarra] chitarra [/URL] chitarra [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/high] high [/URL] high [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/text] text [/URL] text [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/spartito] spartito [/URL] spartito [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/shirt] shirt [/URL] shirt [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bacio] bacio [/URL] bacio [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bocca] bocca [/URL] bocca [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/infermiere] infermiere [/URL] infermiere [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/sandro] sandro [/URL] sandro [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/terreno] terreno [/URL] terreno [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/kataweb] kataweb [/URL] kataweb [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/prevenzione] prevenzione [/URL] prevenzione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/tutti] tutti [/URL] tutti [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/colore] colore [/URL] colore [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/gallerie] gallerie [/URL] gallerie [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/fallimento] fallimento [/URL] fallimento "

Scott wrote on Jan 25, 2007 11:19 AM:

" I am confused to. I also wanted to post about dying deer. Last fall I found many dead turtles out of the creeks. What is up with the posts here about alcoholism and gay marriage , I wonder what story the dead deer comments are appearing under and how they are interpreted ? "

billy wrote on Dec 27, 2006 6:30 AM:

" youyoung people please do not get hooked on alcahol its no fun watching your friends die because they cant quit I know I have been down that road "

2 much time on their hands wrote on Dec 26, 2006 9:07 AM:

" Plainclothes officers in unmarked cars watched for illegal or suspicious activity and then radioed uniformed officers in marked police cars to make stops. is that legal? seems like they have 2 much time or money on their hands "

I'm confused wrote on Aug 24, 2006 9:32 AM:

" Boy, I was going to comment on this but after I read the above comments it looks like those comments refer to a different story. Has there been a mixup in the database? please read the other comments. anyway I will comment on this particular story. I am appalled that the school and the police have not taken this case more seriously. this is how incidents like Columbine happen because a kid gets harrased so bad they eventually break. my question is if the parents think they have an idea who did it why not test those kids DNA and it would probably solve the whole story. if it isn't them then the parents would have to accept that it would be to difficult to keep the case open. It's amazing how a school system will protect the bad kids and the trouble makers because they can bring home a state title but the innocent ones are the ones that pay. how pathetic "

Todd wrote on Jun 11, 2006 10:59 PM:

" I am writing to state my opposition to the protect marriage act. I am a heterosexual however when states like Virginia can pass laws, even if the public votes to pass the law, where a consenting adult can not create a contract with another consenting adult and have it legally honored there is a severe problem with democracy! In many states a millionaire can will to his/her cat or to any organization such as the KKK or other known discriminating, hateful organizations. So taking the bible out of this issue, it's simply a civil rights act. I don't have to say 'allow marriage' but I do not believe any bill should be passed that is basically based on 'sin' in the bible and takes away consenting adults to create contracts regarding financial, legal, or other contracts that effect every day life. Are we going back to Nazi Germany? If we are going to basically use the bible on this law, then it's only fair that we use all the 'statements' in the bible such as adultery, gambling, ect. Should someone who commits adultery have their contracts honored for the rest of their lives? Why are we being selective towards one group? Its bottom line is its illegal regardless of if the people of a state to pass the law. Why should a rapist, a child molester, or a convicted murder be able to create a legal contract and have it honored? The protect marriage act is based on hate. You may not agree with it or choose to have recognized but you have NO right to stop a consenting, law abiding legal tax payer from creating contracts and having them honored the same as any other individual. But yet two of the same sex people are told no contract they have is valid? What is the next step to throw them out of the country or to execute them? Your job is to support living rights, not pick and choose who can or can not have a piece of legal paper honored. Regards, Todd "

bree wrote on May 20, 2006 8:54 AM:

" she should automatically lose her license, at least one year. could that little girl be replaced for $70. "

Mandi wrote on May 11, 2006 8:17 AM:

" How can you let these people back out on the streets? Give me a break 4 years with 4 seperate cases. Rehabilitation is not an option with this idiot.Does he not pose a threat to society? What happened with the third time charge? Oh wait that must only apply to drug offenders! How would his attorney feel if it was his son or daughter that this person molested? Think about how many innocent lives he has already destroyed. What is it going to take to get this guy off the streets for good? How many more times are we (society) going to let someone with his background into our neighborhoods before we say thats it? "

sandra wrote on Apr 24, 2006 3:50 PM:

" i think it might it must have some picture for the children "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY