Tribes see starting own telecoms as sovereignty issue

 
LOADING
May 26, 2004 - 23:15:47 CDT
RAPID CITY, S.D. -- If tribes want decent phone and Internet service on their reservations, they should either start their own telecommunications companies or establish regulatory commissions to oversee them, a panel of American Indian leaders said Wednesday.

J.D. Williams, president of the National Tribal Telecommunications Association, said Indians have the right to govern their own people as well as every business that comes onto tribal land.

"To tribal leaders, it's another sovereignty point that we must step forward," said Williams, general manager of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe Telephone Authority.

The discussion came during the opening session of the Federal Communications Commission's two-day Indian Telecommunications Initiatives workshop and round-table at Rapid City's Rushmore Civic Center.

The FCC also was in town for a Wednesday night public hearing on how local broadcasters are serving their communities.

During his keynote address, FCC Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein said many tribal lands have trouble getting into the analog era let alone the digital age. He said although 94 percent of U.S. households have a telephone line, that number drops to 67 percent in Indian communities.

"And that's not right. We have to fix that," said Adelstein, a Rapid City native. "We've made progress, but we have a long way to go."

Mark White Bull, telecommunications project manager for the Standing Rock Sioux tribe, said Standing Rock is underserved by Verizon Wireless, which he said has just one tower to cover 2.2 million acres.

"There's hills and valleys so there's a lot of dead spots," White Bull said. "I always hear that commercial, 'Can you hear me now?' Come to Standing Rock."

The tribe has had to address other issues with service providers, such as customers being charged long distance fees for calls within the reservation. Standing Rock straddles the South Dakota-North Dakota border.

White Bull wants the tribe to start its own company because others don't understand Indian issues.

"They don't know how they think," he said. "They don't know what they want. They don't know what's out there."

Vernon James, CEO and general manager of the San Carlos Apache Telecommunications Utility, said his tribe began pursuing its dream of forming its own telephone company in the early 1990s, mostly because no one else would provide service.

James said requests for new hookups on the Arizona reservation drew estimates of $3,000 to $6,000, as no companies would invest in the infrastructure to build a network.

By 1997 James' dream became reality, and San Carlos Apache has since grown from 700 to 2,700 access lines. The tribe has dial-up Internet service and is getting ready to roll out high-speed digital subscriber line (DSL).

The tribe's investment through loans has been about $24 million.

"It's a utility that's very capital intensive," James said. "There's a lot of money that must be put into the infrastructure."

Tony Rogers, executive director of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe Utility Commission, said if tribes can't start their own companies, they should at least create a commission to watch over the ones who provide service.

Rosebud is served by four telephone companies, and Rogers would like to see an arrangement for calls between the Rosebud and Pine Ridge Indian reservations to be classified as local.

FCC Chairman Michael Powell was scheduled to deliver the keynote address, but he flew back to Washington Wednesday morning after receiving a call Tuesday from the White House.

Dale Snowden, chief of the FCC's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, said Powell met with tribal representatives for about an hour Tuesday evening, discussing such issues as companies' use of universal access fees and local number portability.

(On the Net: FCC, http://www.fcc.gov.)
   Printer friendly version
Tribes see starting own telecoms as sovereignty issue
Comments

Stacy wrote on Apr 28, 2008 10:53 PM:

" Do you know if employment records from the 20's for this institution still exist? On the 1920 census records I found a relative of mine working there in laundry ironing clothes. "

Angie wrote on Oct 31, 2007 12:41 PM:

" Do you think there might be a connection of the beating death and assult of Pat Stein, from John Leftbear, to the boy they found Russell D. Turcotte, 19, of Wolf Point? It was only a few years apart and they both happened in or around Devil's Lake. "

get his butt !!!!!!! wrote on Jan 10, 2007 11:07 AM:

" tired of hearing about these punk butt men raping, torturing, and even killing our children....she was only 15 and no one cared...no parents, police,.no one...GLAD i don't live in THAT county "

huh? wrote on Oct 4, 2006 1:24 PM:

" I would like to read comments on Joseph Edward Duncan, not random comments that don't related to the subject of the article. What gives? Have these 3 decided to just jump in randomly or were their comments misdirected to the wrong article????? "

DEAR WEBMASTER!!! wrote on Sep 19, 2006 9:02 PM:

" None of the comments on ANY of the pages follow the story. Go crunch some code, Buddy! FIX IT PLEASE. "

Max wrote on Aug 22, 2006 8:41 PM:

" Who owns the natural gas processing plants and who are the main shareholders. Gov. Hoeven stated in 2004 that Tesoro should get 1 million for nothing. Tesoro CEO had just cashed in 5% of his shares of stock for 25 million and bought back 870 million in bonds and that was when oil was $40 a a barrel he now owns about 1 billion at $70 a barrel I would imagine. The gas refinerys cut production 10% in Feb and early again this spring because their was a surplus on hand because Americans had driven less. This is price fixing as far as I am concern. The Tribune still has not asked about the 5 major oil companies that were being investigated for price fixing. Major natural gas storage operators Duke Energy Corp., El Paso Corp., CenterPoint Energy Inc. and ONEOK Inc. told the Wall Street Journal they had received subpoenas from investigators. Several other companies have not received them but are assisting with the investigation. Is this the 2000-2004 rebate we got back from MDU? Did we only get paid for 1 year like other states instead of 4 years refunds? MDU was vague on how we got over charged. Oil and Gas gave 50 million and was the largest contributor to Repulicans campaings. Is this pay for the 1 million Mr. Hoeven received from the Bush Rove campaign committee in 2000? "

Ken Helegeson wrote on Jun 23, 2006 8:34 AM:

" as a past "small" operator in the 70's and 80's and finally becoming a 0 operator in the 90's by FSA standards I come to realize that the CRP programs has taken away "true" land use for what it was and now pays farmers to short change animal producers from grazing land that is only good for goats, sheep or limited number of cattle nontheless it is grzing and Uncle pays farmers to cash in on land that only reall yproduces meat, thus nationally denying the general public from having their tax dollars put to better use. I think Congress needs to redifine farmable acres and give the meat producers their land back and save some money "

Tim Griffin Jr. wrote on May 18, 2006 10:03 AM:

" They need to free Peltier. He didn't do it. Government just wants to put some blame on someone and they chose Peltier. Free him! Free him! "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY