'Hate crime' investigation re-opened

 
LOADING
Apr 02, 2004 - 08:46:31 CST
Bismarck School Board members are waiting for a final report on an investigation into a locker vandalism at Bismarck High School, in which a 17-year-old student's gym locker was filled with human feces, before deciding what action to take.

Police reopened the case in March after a complaint was filed by the student's parents questioning the way the investigation was handled by police and district administrators. Bismarck Police Capt. Duffy Heinle said after looking at the case again, police officials thought additional interviews could provide more leads.

The case had been closed because there was no evidence to prove who did it. Peter and Connie Neigum said they didn't like the way police officials responded to the vandalism targeted at their adopted son, who is black, in what they say they believe is a hate crime. They allege the police dragged their feet on the investigation because the suspects were BHS wrestlers -- who won the state Class A tournament in February.

District officials met with police March 24 to review information they collected in their investigations. Assistant Superintendent John Salwei, who is looking into how the district handled the initial investigation, turned his information over to police. They will interview students in the next two weeks before making a final report.

"The investigation is pretty much in the police's hands," Salwei said.

Parents and community members blasted the district at the last board meeting on March 22 for not reaching a quick resolution to the problem. They also urged board members to look at increasing diversity education because of allegations that classmates made a racial epithet and derogatory "jokes" with racial overtones against the student.

"Jokes and racial epitaphs do lend some concern," parent Jim Lennington told board members. "Apologies should be made and sensitivity training given."

Board members and administrators assured parents they are taking all the necessary steps and if they are able to identify who vandalized the locker, appropriate action will be taken. They also said once Salwei brings a final report of the investigation to the board, further action such as diversity education and policy enforcement could be looked at.

Jeff Evanson, a parent who spoke to the board, said he was glad to hear action was being taken.

"I felt a little better," Evanson said. "But I would like to see more education in cultural diversity."

Board member Parrell Grossman said the board needs to wait until a final report is given and not automatically label the school as having a problem because of one incident.

"We don't know whether there is a serious problem or if it's an isolated incident," he said. "We need to be careful not to condemn the entire student body upon any isolated incidents."

If a final report shows there is a school-wide problem, board members said they will evaluate current programs in place for diversity education and what else they could be doing.

Superintendent Paul Johnson said regardless of the what the final report is, students need to be made more aware of the district's existing harassment policies.

"This is shaking people up a little bit so maybe it makes us consider the fact that our students aren't as accepting of other races or as sophisticated as we thought," Johnson said. "We need to do a better job of communicating to students what our policies and expectations are -- that this type of inappropriate teasing isn't going to be tolerated."

(Reach reporter Sheena Dooley at 250-8225 or sheenadooley@ndonline.com.)
   Printer friendly version
'Hate crime' investigation re-opened
Comments

... wrote on Mar 1, 2007 12:58 PM:

" [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/trojan] trojan [/URL] trojan [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/autostrade] autostrade [/URL] autostrade [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/locazione] locazione [/URL] locazione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/metano] metano [/URL] metano [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/break] break [/URL] break [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/engine] engine [/URL] engine [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/software] software [/URL] software [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/jack] jack [/URL] jack [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/chitarra] chitarra [/URL] chitarra [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/high] high [/URL] high [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/text] text [/URL] text [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/spartito] spartito [/URL] spartito [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/shirt] shirt [/URL] shirt [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bacio] bacio [/URL] bacio [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/bocca] bocca [/URL] bocca [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/infermiere] infermiere [/URL] infermiere [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/sandro] sandro [/URL] sandro [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/terreno] terreno [/URL] terreno [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/kataweb] kataweb [/URL] kataweb [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/prevenzione] prevenzione [/URL] prevenzione [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/tutti] tutti [/URL] tutti [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/colore] colore [/URL] colore [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/gallerie] gallerie [/URL] gallerie [URL=http://www.loqhcali.org/fallimento] fallimento [/URL] fallimento "

Scott wrote on Jan 25, 2007 11:19 AM:

" I am confused to. I also wanted to post about dying deer. Last fall I found many dead turtles out of the creeks. What is up with the posts here about alcoholism and gay marriage , I wonder what story the dead deer comments are appearing under and how they are interpreted ? "

billy wrote on Dec 27, 2006 6:30 AM:

" youyoung people please do not get hooked on alcahol its no fun watching your friends die because they cant quit I know I have been down that road "

2 much time on their hands wrote on Dec 26, 2006 9:07 AM:

" Plainclothes officers in unmarked cars watched for illegal or suspicious activity and then radioed uniformed officers in marked police cars to make stops. is that legal? seems like they have 2 much time or money on their hands "

I'm confused wrote on Aug 24, 2006 9:32 AM:

" Boy, I was going to comment on this but after I read the above comments it looks like those comments refer to a different story. Has there been a mixup in the database? please read the other comments. anyway I will comment on this particular story. I am appalled that the school and the police have not taken this case more seriously. this is how incidents like Columbine happen because a kid gets harrased so bad they eventually break. my question is if the parents think they have an idea who did it why not test those kids DNA and it would probably solve the whole story. if it isn't them then the parents would have to accept that it would be to difficult to keep the case open. It's amazing how a school system will protect the bad kids and the trouble makers because they can bring home a state title but the innocent ones are the ones that pay. how pathetic "

Todd wrote on Jun 11, 2006 10:59 PM:

" I am writing to state my opposition to the protect marriage act. I am a heterosexual however when states like Virginia can pass laws, even if the public votes to pass the law, where a consenting adult can not create a contract with another consenting adult and have it legally honored there is a severe problem with democracy! In many states a millionaire can will to his/her cat or to any organization such as the KKK or other known discriminating, hateful organizations. So taking the bible out of this issue, it's simply a civil rights act. I don't have to say 'allow marriage' but I do not believe any bill should be passed that is basically based on 'sin' in the bible and takes away consenting adults to create contracts regarding financial, legal, or other contracts that effect every day life. Are we going back to Nazi Germany? If we are going to basically use the bible on this law, then it's only fair that we use all the 'statements' in the bible such as adultery, gambling, ect. Should someone who commits adultery have their contracts honored for the rest of their lives? Why are we being selective towards one group? Its bottom line is its illegal regardless of if the people of a state to pass the law. Why should a rapist, a child molester, or a convicted murder be able to create a legal contract and have it honored? The protect marriage act is based on hate. You may not agree with it or choose to have recognized but you have NO right to stop a consenting, law abiding legal tax payer from creating contracts and having them honored the same as any other individual. But yet two of the same sex people are told no contract they have is valid? What is the next step to throw them out of the country or to execute them? Your job is to support living rights, not pick and choose who can or can not have a piece of legal paper honored. Regards, Todd "

bree wrote on May 20, 2006 8:54 AM:

" she should automatically lose her license, at least one year. could that little girl be replaced for $70. "

Mandi wrote on May 11, 2006 8:17 AM:

" How can you let these people back out on the streets? Give me a break 4 years with 4 seperate cases. Rehabilitation is not an option with this idiot.Does he not pose a threat to society? What happened with the third time charge? Oh wait that must only apply to drug offenders! How would his attorney feel if it was his son or daughter that this person molested? Think about how many innocent lives he has already destroyed. What is it going to take to get this guy off the streets for good? How many more times are we (society) going to let someone with his background into our neighborhoods before we say thats it? "

sandra wrote on Apr 24, 2006 3:50 PM:

" i think it might it must have some picture for the children "

Post Your Own Comment
(optional)
   
All online comments are limited to 350 words total.
Comments are reviewed for taste, tone and language before posting.
Some comments may be used in the Tribune's print edition.
We value and respect your privacy, but The Bismarck Tribune might
disclose certain information to governmental entities if served with subpoena.

Copyright © 2009 Bismarck Tribune, a division of Lee Enterprises.  -PRIVACY POLICY